Arch Linux

Camilo

Member

Registered: 2023-06-22

Posts: 7

The link to "FluxBB" at the bottom of the page is broken

It links to

fluxbb.org

but as far as I can tell the official site is

fluxbb.net

mpan

Member

Registered: 2012-08-01

Posts: 1,516

Website

Re: The link to "FluxBB" at the bottom of the page is broken

The last official FluxBB release was 4.5 years ago. The last commit on GitHub on FluxBB mirror was over 2 years ago. The project seems dead and it appears the official website simply went down in late 2022. On Arch’s side migration to other software is being considered.

The .net version is not the official site. It’s a placeholder website for a commercial service.

---

Paperclips in avatars?
NIST on password policies (PDF) — see §3.1.1.2
Sometimes I seem a bit harsh — don’t get offended too easily!

schard

Forum Moderator

From: Hannover

Registered: 2016-05-06

Posts: 2,441

Website

Re: The link to "FluxBB" at the bottom of the page is broken

See also: https://github.com/fluxbb/fluxbb/pull/240

---

Inofficial first vice president of the Rust Evangelism Strike Force

Camilo

Member

Registered: 2023-06-22

Posts: 7

Re: The link to "FluxBB" at the bottom of the page is broken

Well, the other option is to fork/maintain fluxbb. In the meantime, should the link point to the github page or just stay linked to the old and dead domain?

nl6720

The Evil Wiki Admin

Registered: 2016-07-02

Posts: 709

Re: The link to "FluxBB" at the bottom of the page is broken

The Arch forums already use a fork: https://gitlab.archlinux.org/archlinux/archbbs.

ayekat

Member

Registered: 2011-01-17

Posts: 1,626

Re: The link to "FluxBB" at the bottom of the page is broken

How close to upstream is that fork meant to stay?
Because I've got this thing I've been waiting for a while now…

---

pkgs │ hacks │ cfg │ blag

mpan

Member

Registered: 2012-08-01

Posts: 1,516

Website

Re: The link to "FluxBB" at the bottom of the page is broken

There is no upstream anymore to stay close to.

---

Paperclips in avatars?
NIST on password policies (PDF) — see §3.1.1.2
Sometimes I seem a bit harsh — don’t get offended too easily!