You are not logged in.
Pretty much what the title says.
Traceback (most recent call last):
File "/usr/bin/rapid-photo-downloader", line 33, in <module>
sys.exit(load_entry_point('rapid-photo-downloader==0.9.34', 'gui_scripts', 'rapid-photo-downloader')())
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
File "/usr/bin/rapid-photo-downloader", line 25, in importlib_load_entry_point
return next(matches).load()
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
File "/usr/lib/python3.11/importlib/metadata/__init__.py", line 202, in load
module = import_module(match.group('module'))
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
File "/usr/lib/python3.11/importlib/__init__.py", line 126, in import_module
return _bootstrap._gcd_import(name[level:], package, level)
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
File "<frozen importlib._bootstrap>", line 1204, in _gcd_import
File "<frozen importlib._bootstrap>", line 1176, in _find_and_load
File "<frozen importlib._bootstrap>", line 1147, in _find_and_load_unlocked
File "<frozen importlib._bootstrap>", line 690, in _load_unlocked
File "<frozen importlib._bootstrap_external>", line 940, in exec_module
File "<frozen importlib._bootstrap>", line 241, in _call_with_frames_removed
File "/usr/lib/python3.11/site-packages/raphodo/rapid.py", line 53, in <module>
import pkg_resources as pkgr
File "/usr/lib/python3.11/site-packages/pkg_resources/__init__.py", line 3327, in <module>
@_call_aside
^^^^^^^^^^^
File "/usr/lib/python3.11/site-packages/pkg_resources/__init__.py", line 3302, in _call_aside
f(*args, **kwargs)
File "/usr/lib/python3.11/site-packages/pkg_resources/__init__.py", line 3340, in _initialize_master_working_set
working_set = WorkingSet._build_master()
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
File "/usr/lib/python3.11/site-packages/pkg_resources/__init__.py", line 631, in _build_master
ws.require(__requires__)
File "/usr/lib/python3.11/site-packages/pkg_resources/__init__.py", line 968, in require
needed = self.resolve(parse_requirements(requirements))
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
File "/usr/lib/python3.11/site-packages/pkg_resources/__init__.py", line 829, in resolve
dist = self._resolve_dist(
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
File "/usr/lib/python3.11/site-packages/pkg_resources/__init__.py", line 870, in _resolve_dist
raise DistributionNotFound(req, requirers)
pkg_resources.DistributionNotFound: The 'types-python-dateutil>=2.8.10' distribution was not found and is required by arrowLast edited by radumitrescu (2023-10-10 18:04:07)
Romanian street photographer with a passion for vintage lenses, beer and linux. Somewhat of a nerd.
Offline
What makes you think that this has anything to do at all with Gnome? The error is pretty clear:
pkg_resources.DistributionNotFound: The 'types-python-dateutil>=2.8.10' distribution was not found and is required by arrow
Offline
I didn't claim it was because of Gnome 45, but rather that it happened after updating to Gnome 45.
Installing python-types-python-dateutil did it.
Last edited by radumitrescu (2023-10-10 18:03:26)
Romanian street photographer with a passion for vintage lenses, beer and linux. Somewhat of a nerd.
Offline
python-types-python-dateutil is not a package in the repos, python-dateutil and python-typing_extensions are dependencies of python-arrow (which is the complaining package) which is a dependency of rapid-photo-downloader.
I suspect that this is/was related to your other thread in which case you now hopefully understand why partial updates are a bad idea.
Also, ftr. you actually and explicitly claimed "as of upgrading to gome 45" - which is not a thing to begin with.
Offline
I suspect that this is/was related to your other thread in which case you now hopefully understand why partial updates are a bad idea.
What other thread? I think you may have me confused for someone else.
Also, ftr. you actually and explicitly claimed "as of upgrading to gome 45" - which is not a thing to begin with.
Again, I didn't claim causality, but rather a timeline of what and when happened.
Romanian street photographer with a passion for vintage lenses, beer and linux. Somewhat of a nerd.
Offline
What other thread? I think you may have me confused for someone else.
Yup, sorry.
You still were conducting partial updates to get into this situation?
rather a timeline of what and when happened
And are you sure it was "as of upgrading to gnome 45" and not "when the big digit moved onto the 9"?
It's either way irrelevant at best and misleading at worst.
Offline
You still were conducting partial updates to get into this situation?
I did pacman -Syu, took a lot of updates, including Gnome 45 and it was promptly after that rapid-photo-downloader stopped working.
And are you sure it was "as of upgrading to gnome 45" and not "when the big digit moved onto the 9"?
It's either way irrelevant at best and misleading at worst.
Right now it seems to me you're just dragging this on further than it needs to go, so I'll stop here, I think I've explained myself well enough.
Last edited by radumitrescu (2023-10-11 11:30:18)
Romanian street photographer with a passion for vintage lenses, beer and linux. Somewhat of a nerd.
Offline
The why did you have to *install* packages that form a dependency chaing for rapid-photo-downloader?
Have you inspected your pacman log?
And yes, you've sufficiently made clear that you will grasp any silly straw before even coming close to admitting that you made a wrong assumption.
Offline
The why did you have to *install* packages that form a dependency chaing for rapid-photo-downloader?
Have you inspected your pacman log?And yes, you've sufficiently made clear that you will grasp any silly straw before even coming close to admitting that you made a wrong assumption.
This is getting preposterous! I never made the assumption that it was BECAUSE of Gnome 45 that the issue occured, but rather that it was AFTER and I only mentioned that for it to serve as a point of reference, so it can perhaps be helpful in determining what and when happened.
First you confuse me with someone else and try to make this my fault, for taking partial updates. Then, when proven wrong you still assume I've made partial updates. Then, when proven wrong again, you still come at me putting words into my mouth. WTF, man?
You know how people speak of gate-keeping, elitism, bullying and the generally unpleasant demeanor of folks in the hard-core Linux community? You are what they describe. And I don't merely mean this particular thread, but this is a conclusion after several other interactions I've had with you on here in the past.
Last edited by radumitrescu (2023-10-12 05:07:24)
Romanian street photographer with a passion for vintage lenses, beer and linux. Somewhat of a nerd.
Offline
I'm facing the same issue. I know this is marked as solved, but I couldn't immediately find the solution. OP could you please assist?
Thank you.
Offline
Installing python-types-python-dateutil did it.
except that'S BS on multiple levels and nothing in this thread ckecks out.
python-types-python-dateutil is not a package in the repos, python-dateutil and python-typing_extensions are dependencies of python-arrow (which is the complaining package) which is a dependency of rapid-photo-downloader.
pacman -Qikk rapid-photo-downloader python-arrow python-dateutil python-typing_extensionsOffline
Can we remove the solved tag then? Otherwise I can make a separate topic about this.
Offline
We could try to get to the actual bottom of this - start w/ the pacman output to record the status quote of the relevant packages.
Offline
Hello, I have the same issue with the version python-arrow-1.3.0-1. However, I don't use GNOME.
I downgraded the version using the following command:
pacman -U file:///path/to/package/python-arrow-1.2.3-3-any.pkg.tar.zstThis allows rapid-photo-downloader to start.
My system:
Kernel: 6.1.58-1-lts
DE: Plasma 5.27.8
Of course, that's not a permanent solution, I know... What can I do?
Last edited by olmet (2023-10-16 16:36:37)
Offline
This never had anything to do w/ gnome.
Post the output for the command in #11 - the error complains about python-types-python-dateutil being to old and the only version that exists is in teh AUR, https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/pyth … n-dateutil and it's not a dependency of the repo version of rapid-photo-downloader
Offline
This never had anything to do w/ gnome.
Post the output for the command in #11 - the error complains about python-types-python-dateutil being to old and the only version that exists is in teh AUR, https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/pyth … n-dateutil and it's not a dependency of the repo version of rapid-photo-downloader
Thanks for this. I installed this via
yay -S python-types-python-dateutiland rapid-photo-downloader is now working for me.
Offline
OP wrote:Installing python-types-python-dateutil did it.
except that'S BS on multiple levels and nothing in this thread ckecks out.
I've just about had it with you calling me a liar and making all sorts of accusations. Everything I wrote here is the truth and exactly how it happened.
python-types-python-dateutil is not a package in the repos
But it's a package in the AUR and just installing that fixed the issue for me.
This never had anything to do w/ gnome.
For the nth time, I never claimed it had anything to do with Gnome.
it's not a dependency of the repo version of rapid-photo-downloader
Perhaps it should be?
Last edited by radumitrescu (2023-10-17 05:18:30)
Romanian street photographer with a passion for vintage lenses, beer and linux. Somewhat of a nerd.
Offline
seth wrote:This never had anything to do w/ gnome.
Post the output for the command in #11 - the error complains about python-types-python-dateutil being to old and the only version that exists is in teh AUR, https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/pyth … n-dateutil and it's not a dependency of the repo version of rapid-photo-downloader
Thanks for this. I installed this via
yay -S python-types-python-dateutiland rapid-photo-downloader is now working for me.
That's completely fucked up - under no circumstances should anything in the repo depend on anything in the AUR.
Has been reported yesterday, https://bugs.archlinux.org/task/79981?p … thon-arrow
Offline
Has been reported yesterday, https://bugs.archlinux.org/task/79981?p … thon-arrow
So, it means downgrading first and waiting.
Offline