You are not logged in.

#1 2006-12-09 20:50:30

Crooksey
Member
From: UK ~
Registered: 2006-08-14
Posts: 415
Website

Thread Description?

The Desktop environment thread, has the description of Gnome and KDE, i think that this community should be more along the lines of "Running/Configuring X11, FVWM, *Box, and all the other WM/DEs that the OSS community has to offer.

Just my thoughts, arch is described as fast and lightweight, when these WM/DE's are not at all!.

May have been mentioned before, if so, sorry =/


Arch Linux since 2006
Python Web Developer + Sys Admin (Gentoo/BSD)

Offline

#2 2006-12-10 00:30:44

vredfreak
Member
Registered: 2004-11-20
Posts: 66

Re: Thread Description?

Crooksey wrote:

The Desktop environment thread, has the description of Gnome and KDE, i think that this community should be more along the lines of "Running/Configuring X11, FVWM, *Box, and all the other WM/DEs that the OSS community has to offer.

Just my thoughts, arch is described as fast and lightweight, when these WM/DE's are not at all!.

May have been mentioned before, if so, sorry =/

The problem with that is that X11, FVWM, *Box and such are not Desktop Environments.  Window Managers and Desktop Environments are two separate entities.  Of the Desktop Environments available for Linux, KDE and Gnome (and possibly Xfce) are by far and away the best known.


Hi.  I'm a sig.  What are you?

Offline

#3 2006-12-10 02:55:31

cdhotfire
Member
From: Ocala, Florida
Registered: 2006-02-13
Posts: 151

Re: Thread Description?

Crooksey wrote:

The Desktop environment thread, has the description of Gnome and KDE, i think that this community should be more along the lines of "Running/Configuring X11, FVWM, *Box, and all the other WM/DEs that the OSS community has to offer.

Just my thoughts, arch is described as fast and lightweight, when these WM/DE's are not at all!.

May have been mentioned before, if so, sorry =/

From description:
Running/Configuring X11, KDE, GNOME, and all the other WM/DEs that the OSS community has to offer.


[img]http://www.barbarawood.com/guestbook/images/smilies/koolaid.gif[/img]
"Ooooh Yaaaa!"

Offline

#4 2006-12-10 09:14:25

Crooksey
Member
From: UK ~
Registered: 2006-08-14
Posts: 415
Website

Re: Thread Description?

I just found it strange how a community such as this one, labels those over others.


Arch Linux since 2006
Python Web Developer + Sys Admin (Gentoo/BSD)

Offline

#5 2006-12-10 10:40:06

Lone_Wolf
Administrator
From: Netherlands, Europe
Registered: 2005-10-04
Posts: 15,177

Re: Thread Description?

Compare Suse with xfce and archlinux with kde as i have done with suse 9.3 and archlinux 0.7 Wombat .
arch with kde felt more lightweight than suse with xfce.


Disliking systemd intensely, but not satisfied with alternatives so focusing on taming systemd.

clean chroot building not flexible enough ?
Try clean chroot manager by graysky

Online

#6 2006-12-10 12:16:29

LB06
Member
From: The Netherlands
Registered: 2003-10-29
Posts: 435

Re: Thread Description?

I don't think the leightweight principle of Arch is intended more toward the base system.

Regarding third party stuff the principles of "freedom of choice" and "user-control" are more applicable.

Offline

#7 2006-12-10 12:25:53

iphitus
Forum Fellow
From: Melbourne, Australia
Registered: 2004-10-09
Posts: 4,927

Re: Thread Description?

it's a non issue guys..... it was probably just a sentence written by whoever setup the forums as they created that forum, without even a passing thought as to the description. Those two are mentioned probably because within Linux, they are undoubtedly the most used and the first two that come to mind. It hardly speaks for the community, and I'd dare say most people dont even read it -- so long as it gets it's point across, who gives a rats?

James

Offline

Board footer

Powered by FluxBB