Arch Linux

loqs

Member

Registered: 2014-03-06

Posts: 18,033

Re: [SOLVED] './mach' in librewolf PKGBUILD?

Can I sandbox the browser with other applications instead of enabling user namespaces?

The firefox/librewolf sandbox has multiple elements see the Sandbox section of about:support. There are other ways to sandbox the browser but if you are using a sandboxing method such as apparmor that supports enabling user namespaces on a per application basis why would you not use that?

ThoughtBubble

Member

Registered: 2024-07-09

Posts: 43

Re: [SOLVED] './mach' in librewolf PKGBUILD?

I upgraded and installed the package for librewolf-bin. I notice that two packages are being installed in pacman (librewolf-bin, librewolf-bin-debug). Where is this debug package coming from? I think I may have seen it on my first install, but I probably didn't think too much of it and maybe forgot.

librewolf builds for me without issue in a clean chroot.

Can you provide me the list of commands you used to build in a clean chroot? I want to see if it fails when Firefox is already installed before building Librewolf.

Last edited by ThoughtBubble (2024-11-02 00:12:04)

loqs

Member

Registered: 2014-03-06

Posts: 18,033

Re: [SOLVED] './mach' in librewolf PKGBUILD?

DeveloperWiki:Building_in_a_clean_chroot pkgctl is provided by devtools.

git clone https://aur.archlinux.org/librewolf.git
cd librewolf/
pkgctl build

Lone_Wolf

Administrator

From: Netherlands, Europe

Registered: 2005-10-04

Posts: 12,926

Re: [SOLVED] './mach' in librewolf PKGBUILD?

Where is this debug package coming from? I think I may have seen it on my first install, but I probably didn't think too much of it and maybe forgot.

Look at /etc/makepkg.conf and check the options= array values . If needed use man makepkg.conf for more details.

---

Disliking systemd intensely, but not satisfied with alternatives so focusing on taming systemd.

clean chroot building not flexible enough ?
Try clean chroot manager by graysky