You are not logged in.

#26 2024-10-27 23:13:46

loqs
Member
Registered: 2014-03-06
Posts: 18,090

Re: [SOLVED] './mach' in librewolf PKGBUILD?

ThoughtBubble wrote:

Can I sandbox the browser with other applications instead of enabling user namespaces?

The firefox/librewolf sandbox has multiple elements see the Sandbox section of about:support. There are other ways to sandbox the browser but if you are using a sandboxing method such as apparmor that supports enabling user namespaces on a per application basis why would you not use that?

Offline

#27 2024-11-02 00:05:24

ThoughtBubble
Member
Registered: 2024-07-09
Posts: 49

Re: [SOLVED] './mach' in librewolf PKGBUILD?

I upgraded and installed the package for librewolf-bin. I notice that two packages are being installed in pacman (librewolf-bin, librewolf-bin-debug). Where is this debug package coming from? I think I may have seen it on my first install, but I probably didn't think too much of it and maybe forgot.

loqs wrote:

librewolf builds for me without issue in a clean chroot.

Can you provide me the list of commands you used to build in a clean chroot? I want to see if it fails when Firefox is already installed before building Librewolf.

Last edited by ThoughtBubble (2024-11-02 00:12:04)

Offline

#28 2024-11-02 02:07:08

loqs
Member
Registered: 2014-03-06
Posts: 18,090

Re: [SOLVED] './mach' in librewolf PKGBUILD?

DeveloperWiki:Building_in_a_clean_chroot pkgctl is provided by devtools.

git clone https://aur.archlinux.org/librewolf.git
cd librewolf/
pkgctl build

Offline

#29 2024-11-02 11:20:58

Lone_Wolf
Administrator
From: Netherlands, Europe
Registered: 2005-10-04
Posts: 12,985

Re: [SOLVED] './mach' in librewolf PKGBUILD?

ThoughtBubble wrote:

Where is this debug package coming from? I think I may have seen it on my first install, but I probably didn't think too much of it and maybe forgot.

Look at /etc/makepkg.conf and check the options= array values . If needed use man makepkg.conf for more details.


Disliking systemd intensely, but not satisfied with alternatives so focusing on taming systemd.

clean chroot building not flexible enough ?
Try clean chroot manager by graysky

Offline

Board footer

Powered by FluxBB