You are not logged in.
Pages: 1
As an Arch Linux user for a few years now, I've been asking myself the following question.
I've been updating every month so far, which seems like a good balance between the risk of frequent updates and the incompatibility caused by a large version difference due to too infrequent updates.
Does anyone have any experience with how the system reacts if I update every 3 months?
Last edited by silentbob476 (2025-06-01 15:22:09)
Offline
The longer you wait, the more likely you might hit procedural issues and may be forced to do incremental updates using the ALA.
The main issue you'll run into are outdated keys (the pacman wiki addresses this, basically pre-update the keyring) and eg. when the package format changes a MUCH older pacman might not be able to extract the new format.
You absolutely can update systems after several years, but it's not necessarily fun.
good balance between the risk of frequent updates and the incompatibility caused by a large version difference
1. Only update when you know you'll have some time to deal w/ any kind of issue falling out of it
2. Have a rescue medium or a second kernel (which you can manually update in a tic-toc approach, never both kernels at the same time)
3. https://wiki.archlinux.org/title/Arch_L … cific_date
Online
Offline
In an extreme example, we had a situation a long time ago where there were 2 mutually exclusive manual interventions 6 months apart. If you hadn't updated in that 6 months, it was virtually impossible to update from within the system. Waiting just creates more and more problems.
Offline
Thanks, all of you guys!
Should I mark it as solved?
Offline
The easy way is to put it on auto notification of updates and then is up to you to do the update or not.
I always do updates before i close down the computer, minimum once a week (sundays for me).
Offline
Pages: 1