You are not logged in.
I recently reported a 'bug' on Evince (not having a desktop file but being a graphical app). Now I think y'all agree, to be visibly installed, a graphical app needs a menu entry. Evince doesn't.
I filed a bug, the maintainer closed it saying there were already bug reports in the Gnome bugzilla. OK... He's right - i should have looked there. But why isn't the Arch package simply fixed then?
I mean: it's not that big a hassle to write your own tiny .desktop file for the time being and put it in the pkgbuild...
Same goes for the xchm package: no .desktop file, no application icon. Isn't this supposed to be standard?
Thanks for any enlightenment I can get on this.
Got Leenucks? :: Arch: Power in simplicity :: Get Counted! Registered Linux User #392717 :: Blog thingy
Offline
I would just refile it in Flyspray as a feature request.
/path/to/Truth
Offline
Thanks for the hint .
Got Leenucks? :: Arch: Power in simplicity :: Get Counted! Registered Linux User #392717 :: Blog thingy
Offline
I refered to two flyspray tasks and one upstream bugreport, all 3 specify that it's by design and that a viewer-only application is designed to be missing from the menus.
Offline