You are not logged in.

#1 2026-08-29 10:24:27

Lone_Wolf
Administrator
From: Netherlands, Europe
Registered: 2005-10-04
Posts: 15,383

Wiki pages moved to gitlab .md files ?

Apparently archlinux packaging guidelines are no longer on our wiki pages but stored in "Developer Manual" at manual.archlinux.org .

(wiki search does find them)

The layout is very different and splitting ToC between left and right side of the page makes it harder to find something specific.
There's no sign of an equivalent of talk/discussion pages, how would someone propose changes ?

Why was this not announced somewhere public (like the Forum & Wiki discussion board) and where is info about how to build (clean chroot building) ?
GRRRR


Disliking systemd intensely, but not satisfied with alternatives so focusing on taming systemd.

clean chroot building not flexible enough ?
Try clean chroot manager by graysky

Offline

#2 2026-08-29 10:31:03

schard
Forum Moderator
From: Hannover
Registered: 2016-05-06
Posts: 2,696
Website

Re: Wiki pages moved to gitlab .md files ?


Inofficial first vice president of the Rust Evangelism Strike Force

Offline

#3 2026-08-29 10:48:43

Lone_Wolf
Administrator
From: Netherlands, Europe
Registered: 2005-10-04
Posts: 15,383

Re: Wiki pages moved to gitlab .md files ?

Looks like those are still present, but the go package guidelines are now only in the new location .

https://manual.archlinux.page/package-g … ld-options


Disliking systemd intensely, but not satisfied with alternatives so focusing on taming systemd.

clean chroot building not flexible enough ?
Try clean chroot manager by graysky

Offline

#4 2026-08-29 14:50:28

seth
Member
From: Won't reply 2 private help req
Registered: 2012-09-03
Posts: 77,632

Re: Wiki pages moved to gitlab .md files ?

Lone_Wolf wrote:

The layout is very different and splitting ToC between left and right side of the page makes it harder to find something specific.

I personally neither mind layout nor design (actually looks a bit like the css override I'm using on the BBS cool)

Left is list of articles, right is sections of the current article - do you mind the column order?
Eg. prefer articles/TOC/article or TOC/article/list ?


There's no sign of an equivalent of talk/discussion pages, how would someone propose changes ?

https://github.com/openstyles/stylus/wiki/ wink

Offline

#5 2026-08-29 15:46:23

Lone_Wolf
Administrator
From: Netherlands, Europe
Registered: 2005-10-04
Posts: 15,383

Re: Wiki pages moved to gitlab .md files ?

Compare the VCS package guidelines wiki-style with the VCS package guidelines manual style .

When I scroll down/up with the wiki style the toc dynamically highlights the chapter/section I'm viewing making it very easy to see what I'm looking at .

On the manual style page I have to look at the left side to see which article I'm viewing. On the right side I can see the chapter/sections that article has but there's no indication which part I'm viewing.
That makes the manual style a lot worse then the wiki style .

I'm aware of stylus and how powerful it is, but am also aware my understanding of CSS is far to low to create something for it.

There's no sign of an equivalent of talk/discussion pages, how would someone propose changes ?

I wasn't clear enough with that. It should have been :

There's no sign of an equivalent of talk/discussion pages, how would someone propose changes to the content of the articles ?


Disliking systemd intensely, but not satisfied with alternatives so focusing on taming systemd.

clean chroot building not flexible enough ?
Try clean chroot manager by graysky

Offline

#6 2026-08-29 16:39:13

seth
Member
From: Won't reply 2 private help req
Registered: 2012-09-03
Posts: 77,632

Re: Wiki pages moved to gitlab .md files ?

So the gist is

wiki style the toc dynamically highlights the chapter/section

but that requires javascript (monkey-patched w/ eg. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Greasemonkey

The site already uses JS and is apparently build with HUGO which has this documented by every blog under the sun, eg. https://dakotaleemartinez.com/tutorials … -contents/

There's no sign of an equivalent of talk/discussion pages, how would someone propose changes to the content of the articles ?

Link on the lower right end of the page: https://gitlab.archlinux.org/archlinux/ … type=heads
So apparently https://gitlab.archlinux.org/archlinux/ … ge_size=20 ?

This is of course the opposite of a wiki since nobody has archlinux gitlab accounts…

Offline

#7 2026-08-29 20:06:36

Trilby
Inspector Parrot
Registered: 2011-11-29
Posts: 30,510
Website

Re: Wiki pages moved to gitlab .md files ?

seth wrote:

Left is list of articles, right is sections of the current article - do you mind the column order?

That's a distinction without a difference when the difference between and article and section of an article is abitrary.


"UNIX is simple and coherent" - Dennis Ritchie; "GNU's Not Unix" - Richard Stallman

Offline

#8 2026-08-30 10:09:48

Lone_Wolf
Administrator
From: Netherlands, Europe
Registered: 2005-10-04
Posts: 15,383

Re: Wiki pages moved to gitlab .md files ?

seth wrote:

    There's no sign of an equivalent of talk/discussion pages, how would someone propose changes to the content of the articles ?

Link on the lower right end of the page: https://gitlab.archlinux.org/archlinux/ … type=heads
So apparently https://gitlab.archlinux.org/archlinux/ … ge_size=20 ?

This is of course the opposite of a wiki since nobody has archlinux gitlab accounts…

So the edit page link sends you to archlinux gitlab. Once logged in I seem to have edit rights.


Disliking systemd intensely, but not satisfied with alternatives so focusing on taming systemd.

clean chroot building not flexible enough ?
Try clean chroot manager by graysky

Offline

#9 2026-08-30 10:12:54

Lone_Wolf
Administrator
From: Netherlands, Europe
Registered: 2005-10-04
Posts: 15,383

Re: Wiki pages moved to gitlab .md files ?

Moderator Note
split off from https://bbs.archlinux.org/viewtopic.php?id=85474


Disliking systemd intensely, but not satisfied with alternatives so focusing on taming systemd.

clean chroot building not flexible enough ?
Try clean chroot manager by graysky

Offline

Board footer

Powered by FluxBB