You are not logged in.

#1 2007-03-09 09:41:12

upuaut
Member
Registered: 2006-05-30
Posts: 19

wengophone-ng-svn vs. wengophone-ng

Hi,

there are two AUR Packages wit "ng" in its name.

1. wengophone-ng-svn 10086-2
http://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?d … s=0&SeB=nd
Here you can read:
20070304 NOTE: As always, you will experience crashes. However, I will recommend using this one instead of my wengophone-ng package.

2. wengophone-ng 2.1rc1-1
http://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?d … s=0&SeB=nd
This one is the newest: 20070309

Both Packages are from djclue917.

Witch should I use?? sad


Greets,

Upuaut


Have Fun,

Upuaut

Offline

#2 2007-03-09 11:26:32

Stalwart
Member
From: Latvia, Riga
Registered: 2005-10-18
Posts: 445
Website

Re: wengophone-ng-svn vs. wengophone-ng

-svn are unstable versions, but they usually have more features


IRC: Stalwart @ FreeNode
Skype ID: thestalwart
WeeChat-devel nightly packages for i686

Offline

#3 2007-03-09 13:33:00

skottish
Forum Fellow
From: Here
Registered: 2006-06-16
Posts: 7,942

Re: wengophone-ng-svn vs. wengophone-ng

The subversion build is much older, and uses Scons instead of CMake as a build system. These are much different setups, which is why DJClue is adding different AUR builds. If you're going to try, use #2 on your list.

Oh yeah, welcome to Arch.

Last edited by skottish (2007-03-09 13:33:39)

Offline

#4 2007-03-10 12:02:06

upuaut
Member
Registered: 2006-05-30
Posts: 19

Re: wengophone-ng-svn vs. wengophone-ng

Thanks for your answers.

I give wengophone-ng 2.1rc1-1 a try.


Have Fun,

Upuaut

Offline

Board footer

Powered by FluxBB