You are not logged in.

#1 2007-04-23 12:35:21

brainwasher
Member
From: Lucca (Italy)
Registered: 2007-01-04
Posts: 81
Website

/opt or /usr ?

PLEASEEEEE, dont move gnome to /usr, please.
I want gnome in a separate directory, please.
/opt 4 president tongue

Offline

#2 2007-04-23 12:55:09

DaNiMoTh
Member
Registered: 2006-06-10
Posts: 260

Re: /opt or /usr ?

GNOME is already on /usr.

Offline

#3 2007-04-23 13:04:57

brainwasher
Member
From: Lucca (Italy)
Registered: 2007-01-04
Posts: 81
Website

Re: /opt or /usr ?

what ?

Offline

#4 2007-04-23 13:15:19

tomk
Forum Fellow
From: Ireland
Registered: 2004-07-21
Posts: 9,839

Offline

#5 2007-04-23 13:26:45

brainwasher
Member
From: Lucca (Italy)
Registered: 2007-01-04
Posts: 81
Website

Re: /opt or /usr ?

my gnome is in /opt, not in /usr

Offline

#6 2007-04-23 13:28:03

Ramses de Norre
Member
From: Leuven - Belgium
Registered: 2007-03-27
Posts: 1,289

Re: /opt or /usr ?

Then you haven't updated yet or you're using a mirror that isn't synced yet.

Offline

#7 2007-04-24 02:13:36

Phrodo_00
Member
From: Seattle, WA
Registered: 2006-04-09
Posts: 342
Website

Re: /opt or /usr ?

brainwasher wrote:

what ?

lol I'm actually actualizing while I write this, I liked it better in /opt too, but it doesn't botter me to have it in usr either.

Offline

#8 2007-04-24 09:59:38

iphitus
Forum Fellow
From: Melbourne, Australia
Registered: 2004-10-09
Posts: 4,927

Re: /opt or /usr ?

except, there's no reason for keeping it in opt now smile

Offline

#9 2007-04-24 14:37:24

STiAT
Member
From: Vienna, Austria
Registered: 2004-12-23
Posts: 606

Re: /opt or /usr ?

What actually was the reason for gnome to be in /opt?

I always was interested which kind of packages should be in /opt and which in /usr...


Ability is nothing without opportunity.

Offline

#10 2007-04-24 18:33:26

buddabrod
Member
From: Germany
Registered: 2007-02-25
Posts: 220

Re: /opt or /usr ?

STiAT wrote:

What actually was the reason for gnome to be in /opt?

I always was interested which kind of packages should be in /opt and which in /usr...

Gentoo for instance puts proprietary packages like some games into /opt and all open source packages are put in /usr.
When i switched to arch, i was suprised that here is a different way of handling that.

Offline

#11 2007-04-24 23:24:49

gentoofu
Member
Registered: 2006-10-05
Posts: 34

Re: /opt or /usr ?

STiAT wrote:

What actually was the reason for gnome to be in /opt?

I always was interested which kind of packages should be in /opt and which in /usr...

I've read that there's too much unnecessary stuff that's needed to be done when they're in /opt, like messing with scrpts, config files, PKGBUILDS, etc. I think a bunch of apps in /opt that requires stuff from /usr needs to do a lot symlinking on files and it's quite a hassle to do for each update. Anyway, in short, it'll be lighter load for the devs/maintainers.

Offline

#12 2007-04-25 01:30:23

byte
Member
From: Düsseldorf (DE)
Registered: 2006-05-01
Posts: 2,046

Re: /opt or /usr ?

It will surely cut down on IRC talks like this:

guy: I just installed Gnome/Firefox/whatever but I get "command not found"?!?
archer: log out and in again or run 'source /etc/profile'

wink


1000

Offline

#13 2007-04-25 01:45:20

Pudge
Arch Linux f@h Team Member
Registered: 2006-01-23
Posts: 300

Re: /opt or /usr ?

Just updated my system with the Gnome move to /usr.   I have two observations:

1  Had to edit the /etc/inittab line:

x:5:respawn:/opt/gnome/sbin/gdm -nodaemon

To

x:5:respawn:/usr/sbin/gdm -nodaemon

2  When I rebooted, Firestarter ran the initialization program again.  I had to reset options, and policies were totally gone and needed to be redone.

That's the only things I had to do. 

I noticed that the /opt/gnome folder still exists with some sub-folders.  I assume this is some left over files that just didn't get deleted.  At this point in time, if you have done a full system update can you safely delete the /opt/gnome folder to clean up the system?

Pudge

Offline

#14 2007-04-25 05:56:32

rpgcyco
Member
From: Australia
Registered: 2005-09-27
Posts: 74

Re: /opt or /usr ?

Some of those left over files belong to the gnome-common package, which is probably still installed. IIRC, some packages' install files use an absolute path when running gconf.

- Rpg Cyco

Offline

#15 2007-04-25 06:46:00

Snowman
Developer/Forum Fellow
From: Montreal, Canada
Registered: 2004-08-20
Posts: 5,212

Re: /opt or /usr ?

It's also possible that some community/unsupported packages (like mine tongue ) installed in /opt/gnome haven't been moved to /usr yet. You should do a 'pacman -Qo' on these files to know to which package they belong.

I would recommend keeping the gnome-common package for a while to make sure that these packages still install and function correctly as rpgcyco said. I guess that eventually gnome-common will be removed from the repo.

Offline

#16 2007-04-25 14:15:58

cromo
Member
From: Czestochowa, Poland
Registered: 2006-09-20
Posts: 87

Re: /opt or /usr ?

Is this going to happen with kde, too?

Offline

#17 2007-04-25 22:56:07

JGC
Developer
Registered: 2003-12-03
Posts: 1,664

Re: /opt or /usr ?

Moving kde to /usr is not unlikely to happen, but I think Tobias will hold off the move for a while. I think KDE will come to /usr when it hits 4.0.

Offline

#18 2007-04-26 05:06:32

attila
Member
Registered: 2006-11-14
Posts: 293

Re: /opt or /usr ?

cromo wrote:

Is this going to happen with kde, too?

I have heard that Fedora at example have kde in /usr and i think this is all a definition of what is a add-on packages and what is part of the default installation.

http://www.linux.com/guides/Linux-Files … /opt.shtml

But don't ask me too more because i am a normal human and so i like the different directories in /opt.-)

Offline

#19 2007-06-04 14:26:04

bnxs
Member
From: Resita, Romania
Registered: 2006-12-23
Posts: 8

Re: /opt or /usr ?

Late?

iphitus wrote:

except, there's no reason for keeping it in opt now"

:mad
what about
http://www.pathname.com/fhs/pub/fhs-2.3.html
or

Offline

#20 2007-06-04 14:41:40

iphitus
Forum Fellow
From: Melbourne, Australia
Registered: 2004-10-09
Posts: 4,927

Re: /opt or /usr ?

bnxs wrote:

Late?

iphitus wrote:

except, there's no reason for keeping it in opt now"

:mad
what about
http://www.pathname.com/fhs/pub/fhs-2.3.html
or

this thread's about the gnome move from opt, and as I said above, and you quoted, there's no reason for gnome to be kept in opt now.

Offline

#21 2007-06-04 15:15:59

bnxs
Member
From: Resita, Romania
Registered: 2006-12-23
Posts: 8

Re: /opt or /usr ?

of course it's about moving gnome from /opt to /usr...
never mind sad

Offline

Board footer

Powered by FluxBB