Arch Linux

JaDa

Member

From: Sun City, CA (native German)

Registered: 2007-04-06

Posts: 210

Website

Update june 28 2007 gstreamer

[root@arch-01 jada]# pacman -Syu
:: Synchronizing package databases...
 current is up to date
 extra is up to date
 community is up to date
:: Starting full system upgrade...
resolving dependencies... done.
looking for inter-conflicts... done.

Targets: gstreamer0.10-good-0.10.6-1  gstreamer0.10-aalib-0.10.6-1  gstreamer0.10-annodex-0.10.6-1  gstreamer0.10-cairo-0.10.6-1
         gstreamer0.10-cdio-0.10.6-1  gstreamer0.10-dv-0.10.6-1  gstreamer0.10-dv1394-0.10.6-1  gstreamer0.10-esd-0.10.6-1  gstreamer0.10-flac-0.10.6-1
         gstreamer0.10-gconf-0.10.6-1  gstreamer0.10-gdkpixbuf-0.10.6-1  gstreamer0.10-hal-0.10.6-1  gstreamer0.10-jpeg-0.10.6-1
         gstreamer0.10-ladspa-0.10.6-1  gstreamer0.10-libcaca-0.10.6-1  gstreamer0.10-libpng-0.10.6-1  gstreamer0.10-shout2-0.10.6-1
         gstreamer0.10-speex-0.10.6-1  gstreamer0.10-taglib-0.10.6-1

Total Package Size:   0.91 MB

Proceed with installation? [Y/n] y
checking package integrity... done.
cleaning up... done.
(19/19) checking for file conflicts                 [################################################################################################] 100%
error: could not prepare transaction
error: failed to commit transaction (conflicting files)
gstreamer0.10-good: /usr/lib/gstreamer-0.10/libgstqtdemux.so exists in filesystem
gstreamer0.10-good: /usr/lib/gstreamer-0.10/libgstvideocrop.so exists in filesystem

errors occurred, no packages were upgraded.

I think there goes something wrong

---

openSUSE
Arch Linux
USALUG

rohanrns

Member

From: Santa Cruz, CA

Registered: 2006-05-14

Posts: 11

Website

Re: Update june 28 2007 gstreamer

exact same issue here.  It seem to be because gstreamer0.10-bad also provides those listed files and gstreamer0.10-bad has yet to be updated to the new version.  Which means pacman gets angry because the file already exists due to the older version of gstreamer0.10-bad which exists on the system.

---

Hello World!

dolby

Member

From: 1992

Registered: 2006-08-08

Posts: 1,581

Re: Update june 28 2007 gstreamer

it might be safe to force the upgrade

---

There shouldn't be any reason to learn more editor types than emacs or vi -- mg (1)
[You learn that sarcasm does not often work well in international forums.  That is why we avoid it. -- ewaller (arch linux forum moderator)

tomk

Forum Fellow

From: Ireland

Registered: 2004-07-21

Posts: 9,839

Re: Update june 28 2007 gstreamer

If you're not in a hurry, wait for the -bad package upgrade. Otherwise, I'd suggest -Syf for the -good package, followed by -Su for everything else.

JaDa

Member

From: Sun City, CA (native German)

Registered: 2007-04-06

Posts: 210

Website

Re: Update june 28 2007 gstreamer

If you're not in a hurry, wait for the -bad package upgrade. Otherwise, I'd suggest -Syf for the -good package, followed by -Su for everything else.

I am not in hurry

Thank's

---

openSUSE
Arch Linux
USALUG