You are not logged in.
As viper and ck are discontinued, i am using kamikaze from AUR and it works well for me
Offline
I'm just using stock -ARCH...I was always worried about trying random patchsets
Offline
As viper and ck are discontinued, i am using kamikaze from AUR and it works well for me
Seconded. It uses ck-patches (largely for swap prefetch and the like), and the CFS scheduler isn't nearly as bad as it was. By that, I mean I've been very happy with it, and after hating it so passionately in the past this is quite welcome.
Cthulhu For President!
Offline
I'm just sticking with the last ck kernel until mainline reaches at least 23.2 The current one is stable and fast. Why upgrade?!?
Offline
stock -ARCH here too. it has become my only kernel since beyond died. it was only used as a "backup" kernel back then
Last edited by dolby (2007-08-22 22:42:39)
There shouldn't be any reason to learn more editor types than emacs or vi -- mg (1)
[You learn that sarcasm does not often work well in international forums. That is why we avoid it. -- ewaller (arch linux forum moderator)
Offline
.
Last edited by benplaut (2021-06-25 12:25:26)
Offline
At the moment stock -ARCH kernel recompiled with SLUB and some other configuration tweaks. I used to need the suspend2 patch for my laptop, but since then I've learned how to configure hibernation without it, so I no longer need it. Once SLUB becomes the default I will just use the default kernel.
Offline