kernel26ck, what now?

silencer · 2007-10-16 00:50:38

Hi!

Now that kernel26ck is no more. Is there a similar kernel? I really enjoy kernel26ck, I think it really improves performance on the desktop.

thanks a lot!
silencer

buttons · 2007-10-16 01:01:13

Try kamikaze. It's fast and full-featured.

circleback · 2007-10-16 02:59:34

Is there a fglrx module to kamikaze?

skottish · 2007-10-16 03:00:40

I'm finding that the 2.6.23 kernel feels more responsive on my x86_64 machine than the CK kernel did. There are a few things that I haven't tried yet, but for day to day operations it seems like a great replacement.

Mikko777 · 2007-10-16 10:23:41

skottish wrote:

I'm finding that the 2.6.23 kernel feels more responsive on my x86_64 machine than the CK kernel did. There are a few things that I haven't tried yet, but for day to day operations it seems like a great replacement.

+1 default kernel .23 >= old ck kernel.

somairotevoli · 2007-10-16 12:33:07

^+2 just switch bk a few days ago.

shamrok · 2007-10-16 14:06:28

+1 for kamikaze, maybe some TU will put it in [community], so it will fill the void after ck

silencer · 2007-10-19 18:51:09

Great! I'll try kamikaze, thanks a lot!

somairotevoli · 2007-10-19 20:22:57

I really liked kamikaze except I experience higher cpu temps and yet no one has answered my cry for help:(

Arch Linux

#1 2007-10-16 00:50:38

kernel26ck, what now?

#2 2007-10-16 01:01:13

Re: kernel26ck, what now?

#3 2007-10-16 02:59:34

Re: kernel26ck, what now?

#4 2007-10-16 03:00:40

Re: kernel26ck, what now?

#5 2007-10-16 10:23:41

Re: kernel26ck, what now?

#6 2007-10-16 12:33:07

Re: kernel26ck, what now?

#7 2007-10-16 14:06:28

Re: kernel26ck, what now?

#8 2007-10-19 18:51:09

Re: kernel26ck, what now?

#9 2007-10-19 20:22:57

Re: kernel26ck, what now?

Board footer