You are not logged in.
Pages: 1
I have several packages listed in pacman.conf with IgnorePkg because I roll my own kernel and I don't like kernel related stuff upgraded until I have understood what will change. This prevents accidents, if you know what I mean. Anyway, since my upgrade to Pacman 3, pacman reports on a 'pacman -Syu' the following:
$ sudo pacman -Syu
:: Synchronizing package databases...
testing 2.3K 431.6K/s 00:00:00 [#####################################] 100%
current is up to date
extra is up to date
unstable 9.0K 86.6K/s 00:00:00 [#####################################] 100%
community is up to date
:: Starting full system upgrade...
warning: gcc-4.1.2-4: ignoring package upgrade (4.1.2-4)
warning: initscripts-0.8-7: ignoring package upgrade (0.8-7)
warning: kernel26-2.6.21.1-9: ignoring package upgrade (2.6.21.1-8)
warning: nvidia-1.0.9755-5: ignoring package upgrade (1.0.9755-5)
warning: nvidia-utils-1.0.9755-1: ignoring package upgrade (1.0.9755-1)
warning: udev-110-3: ignoring package upgrade (110-3)
local database is up to date
When there was no upgrade with pacman 2, there was no output. Here, a warning is displayed even though there is no newer version of an ignored package available. Why is there now a warning on those packages even though there is no upgrade available? I am actually thinking this is a bug, but wanted to ask first if it is intended.
Offline
i posted about it too bout a week ago. twice on the same thread tbph. noone replied on that
There shouldn't be any reason to learn more editor types than emacs or vi -- mg (1)
[You learn that sarcasm does not often work well in international forums. That is why we avoid it. -- ewaller (arch linux forum moderator)
Offline
Hmm, interesting. Can you guys file a bug report so we actually see this kind of stuff? Forums are not the best place for bug reports as we don't always check them.
Offline
http://bbs.archlinux.org/viewtopic.php?id=32504 was the thread i had opened
http://bugs.archlinux.org/task/7111
edit: sorry for the messy bug report. seems u cant edit after u post em
Last edited by dolby (2007-05-10 04:49:02)
There shouldn't be any reason to learn more editor types than emacs or vi -- mg (1)
[You learn that sarcasm does not often work well in international forums. That is why we avoid it. -- ewaller (arch linux forum moderator)
Offline
Huh, I'm sorry about that, I thought this was an isolated issue. It looks more widespread.
Either way, at least it's only a cosmetic bug.
I have a feeling it's related to this:
http://projects.archlinux.org/git/gitwe … e7b518f2b9
Offline
Okay, good. I'm glad it isn't me and it looks like a bug. I won't give it a worry, it seems you guys are on it.
Offline
[md@Arch pacman]$ sudo pacman -Su
:: Starting full system upgrade...
warning: kernel26-2.6.23.1-2: ignoring package upgrade (2.6.23.1-3)
warning: nvidia-100.14.19-3: ignoring package upgrade (100.14.19-3)
warning: nvidia-utils-100.14.19-2: ignoring package upgrade (100.14.19-2)
warning: wine-0.9.44-1: ignoring package upgrade (0.9.47-1)
local database is up to date
[md@Arch pacman]$ pacman -Qi pacman
Name : pacman
Version : 3.0.6-1
URL : http://www.archlinux.org/pacman/
License : GPL
Groups : base
Provides : None
Depends On : fakeroot libarchive libdownload
Removes : None
Required By : None
Conflicts With : pacman-rc
Installed Size : 2165.20 K
Packager : Dan McGee <dan@archlinux.org>
Architecture : i686
Build Date : Sun Sep 16 22:33:26 2007 UTC
Build Type : Unknown
I have the same question, anyone know how to solve it?
thanks!
Offline
You don't. It's just cosmetic, so I think we just wait for it to be addressed by the pacman developers.
Offline
I has been addressed... I submitted a bug report a while back. Apparently fixed in pacman v3.1.
Offline
It has been addressed... I submitted a bug report a while back. Apparently fixed in pacman v3.1.
Yes, it was my mistake, I fixed it as soon as I saw the bug report, and my patch was merged. That was quite a while ago, I didn't even realize it was only fixed in pacman 3.1
http://projects.archlinux.org/git/gitwe … 341018c0fa
The only bug report I saw is 7111 reported by dolby though, you also reported another one?
pacman roulette : pacman -S $(pacman -Slq | LANG=C sort -R | head -n $((RANDOM % 10)))
Offline
Yep - I think it was flagged as a dupe from memory...
http://bugs.archlinux.org/task/7656
Last edited by Allan (2007-10-23 01:15:18)
Offline
Yep - I think it was flagged as a dupe from memory...
Uh yep, I don't have any memory, I'm the one who said it was a dup of 7111..
pacman roulette : pacman -S $(pacman -Slq | LANG=C sort -R | head -n $((RANDOM % 10)))
Offline
Pages: 1