You are not logged in.
Hello sirs,
I have an Intel wifi card 3945 with driver ipw3945.
Sometimes I can connect, but the most part of the time it is impossible to connect with Network Manager.
I've already tried with wicd, wifi radar, wpa_supplicant and nothing
My wifi is: WPA 2 Personal AES CCMP Hidden SSID (with broadcast ssid it has the same)
My config of wpa_supplicant.conf:
ctrl_interface=/var/run/wpa_supplicant
ctrl_interface_group=wheel
ap_scan=2
network={
ssid="MY SSID"
scan_ssid=0
key_mgmt=WPA-PSK
psk="PSK KEY generaetd with wpa_supplicant"
priority=1
}
When i run
wpa_supplicant -ieth1 -c/etc/wpa_supplicant.conf -Dwext
It outputs the following
Trying to associate with SSID '...'
Authentication with 00:00:00:00:00:00 timed out.
I have already tried:
iwconfig eth1 up
iwconfig eth1 essid MY-SSID ap MY-AP-MAC
wpa_supplicant -ieth1 -c/etc/wpa_supplicant.conf -Dwext
And happened the same.
Any idea?
Last edited by alexmgarcia (2007-11-06 00:33:28)
Offline
What happens if you don't use network manager?
Offline
If I don't use networkmanager I can't connect. With Network Manager SOMETIMES I can connect, but rarely.
I will test this with wep and without encryption and watch what happens. Perhaps is a bug in ipw3945 driver.
Last edited by alexmgarcia (2007-11-05 19:16:39)
Offline
I can only say I have had similar issues with rt2x00 drivers (and the legacy ones), and with the (stable!) ipw2200 drivers. You could think the beta status of iwlwifi drivers has something to do with it, but frankly I don't. Linux + hidden APs alltogether do not seem to work well together.
Last edited by B (2007-11-05 21:26:59)
Got Leenucks? :: Arch: Power in simplicity :: Get Counted! Registered Linux User #392717 :: Blog thingy
Offline
So I need to wait a stable driver of iwlwifi?
I tested with ndiswrapper and same thing
Well, I will put the ssid with broadcasting and test it.
EDIT: I've putted it with broadcasting ON and I can connect.
Question: When ssid is broadcasting is not more vulnerable then when it is hidden? I use WPA2 PSK AES CCMP, does it is safe to have ssid broadcasting on it?
Last edited by alexmgarcia (2007-11-05 22:48:07)
Offline
So I need to wait a stable driver of iwlwifi?
I tested with ndiswrapper and same thing
Well, I will put the ssid with broadcasting and test it.EDIT: I've putted it with broadcasting ON and I can connect.
Question: When ssid is broadcasting is not more vulnerable then when it is hidden? I use WPA2 PSK AES CCMP, does it is safe to have ssid broadcasting on it?
No more vulnerable. When ssid broadcasting is off, it's still possible to detect that a network exists, and there are ways of uncovering it's ssid.
You're running wpa2, you should be fine as long as you don't have an obvious dictionary word for your passkey.
James
Offline
No
It's a 16 characteres passkey with characters like % $ # :-P
Well, I will put problem solved in the topic title.
Thank you B for the hint of broadcasting ssid :-)
And thanks to others too, Open Source Community rox!
Last edited by alexmgarcia (2007-11-06 00:30:55)
Offline
Wait... How did you solve it?
Got Leenucks? :: Arch: Power in simplicity :: Get Counted! Registered Linux User #392717 :: Blog thingy
Offline
I "solved" it putting the ssid in broadcasting. But with hidden it fails
Offline
Several drivers have had problems with this. There was some discussion on this topic on the wireless-dev mailing list, and I think they have been fixed at least for iwl{3945,4965} and ralink.
Offline
Ok brain0, when it comes stable I will try and do a feedback in this topic.
Offline