You are not logged in.
- Topics: Active | Unanswered
Pages: 1
#1 2004-06-14 21:50:13
- yarjar
- Member
- From: Madison, WI
- Registered: 2004-05-29
- Posts: 37
Icons?
pacman doesn't seem to be doing so well with icons. Some are installed in /usr/share/pixmaps, some are in their own random places, and some I can't find at all (Bluefish). One nice thing about yum (Fedora's package manager) was that it put all the icons in /usr/share/pixmaps. What's up with this?
Offline
#2 2004-06-14 22:05:19
- leejpar
- Member
- From: Texas, USA
- Registered: 2004-05-28
- Posts: 51
- Website
Re: Icons?
Not really a pacman issue. What I have found is that most of the icons get installed properly for KDE, just not for Gnome.
Linux Registered User #337161
'It's free. It works. Duh.'" - Eric Harrison
Offline
#3 2004-06-15 03:16:13
- Dusty
- Schwag Merchant
- From: Medicine Hat, Alberta, Canada
- Registered: 2004-01-18
- Posts: 5,986
- Website
Re: Icons?
Forgive my lapse into being an asshole and don't take me seriously when I say... what do icons have to do with CLI? :-D
You could submit a bug report. It would be sensible to put icons in a single place, but its going to entail editing a lot of PKGBUILDs. It won't get priority at this time though. Too much other stuff to be done.
Its a good suggestion though.
Dusty
Offline
Pages: 1