You are not logged in.
Hi, everybody,
I'm quite new to the Arch. Trying to install it on my old notebook from 2007.08-2 iso, then upgrading, I discovered that the 2.6.24 kernel won't run on it. Well, I tried to put the line IgnorePkg=kernel26 into my /etc/packman.conf (upgrading the pacman first), but after packman -Syu got some unresolved dependencies and was forced to the 2.6.24 kernel anyway. How am I to control the kernel version during upgrades?
Offline
I guess you should IgnorePkg the dependencies as well... Not recommended however... Best way would be to find & solve by yourself or with help from the forums the issue with 2.6.24
Offline
What do you mean by "issue"? LiveCDs of other distros based on 2.6.24 behave the same way on the hardware in question. Nothing to be done except for keeping an older kernel unless I'm missing an important concept.
Offline
IgnorePkg is correct.
What issues were you having with unresolved dependencies?
"Be conservative in what you send; be liberal in what you accept." -- Postel's Law
"tacos" -- Cactus' Law
"t̥͍͎̪̪͗a̴̻̩͈͚ͨc̠o̩̙͈ͫͅs͙͎̙͊ ͔͇̫̜t͎̳̀a̜̞̗ͩc̗͍͚o̲̯̿s̖̣̤̙͌ ̖̜̈ț̰̫͓ạ̪͖̳c̲͎͕̰̯̃̈o͉ͅs̪ͪ ̜̻̖̜͕" -- -̖͚̫̙̓-̺̠͇ͤ̃ ̜̪̜ͯZ͔̗̭̞ͪA̝͈̙͖̩L͉̠̺͓G̙̞̦͖O̳̗͍
Offline
What do you mean by "issue"? LiveCDs of other distros based on 2.6.24 behave the same way on the hardware in question. Nothing to be done except for keeping an older kernel unless I'm missing an important concept.
I mean: why precisely won't 2.6.24 run on your machine and can't this be solved or is it definitely confirmed as a lost cause...
Offline
It's coreutils vs mktemp issue. Right now I accepted the deletion of mktemp. Whether It's been a right decision, remains to bee seen .
Last edited by Llama (2008-03-03 09:17:56)
Offline
I mean: why precisely won't 2.6.24 run on your machine and can't this be solved or is it definitely confirmed as a lost cause...
It's a case of a binary dump on startup. A lost cause, I'm afraid.
Offline
It's coreutils vs mktemp issue.
That's not an issue. mktemp has been incorporated into the coreutils package - this is an upstream decision, independent of Arch. Accepting the replacement is correct.
Offline
@Llama,
You're not by any chance suffering from the same kernel 2.6.24 laptop problem as I (and others) have? See http://bbs.archlinux.org/viewtopic.php?id=44831 and http://bbs.archlinux.org/viewtopic.php? … 18#p334218 where downgrading seems the only way to go at the moment.
Offline
It does ring a bell, ninian. "Nehemiah" is my chip, according to KNOPPIX, whatever it means. It's a kernel bug, all right.
Last edited by Llama (2008-03-03 17:54:16)
Offline