You are not logged in.
the perl move to 5.10 has to be completed probably before that. and tpowa has to make time in order to build the isos . if not in february, maybe withing the first 1-2 weeks in march. according to my estimation.
Last edited by dolby (2008-02-14 14:46:16)
There shouldn't be any reason to learn more editor types than emacs or vi -- mg (1)
[You learn that sarcasm does not often work well in international forums. That is why we avoid it. -- ewaller (arch linux forum moderator)
Offline
I'm also looking forward to the new ISOs. Considering to switch my "main" desktop back to Arch from Ubuntu, but would prefer to do that with the new ISOs, just for convenience and speed (down speed maxes out at 46k/s). Thanks for the effort, by the way!
Offline
A 2.6.24 based ISO would be good for people who encrypt the disk before installing Arch, because the new kernel supports the XTS block cipher.
Offline
Looking forward to new isos as well. Will be using it to install Arch both to my PC and my Santa Rosa MacBook Pro. Do we have any sort of ETA? Just curious.
Keep up the good work mates!
Offline
Cannot give any date, but new ISOs are planned to be released soon (which means - as soon as they will be ready for testing).
to live is to die
Offline
Not sure if it's just me or what...
/tmp/ have permission of 755 and -t.
Offline
Not sure if it's just me or what...
/tmp/ have permission of 755 and -t.
http://bugs.archlinux.org/task/9560
You are right, but it's not only you... it's the filesystem (-6) as I understand it. Hopefully fixed in filesystem (-7). And the coming installer.
EDIT: Just read another bugreport on the bad /tmp permissions, from there the conclusion is the issue is fixable by updating pacman before updating the filesystem package.
http://bugs.archlinux.org/task/9465
chmod 1777 /tmp and chmod +t /tmp should do the trick otherwise... (if I'm correct)
Last edited by ibendiben (2008-02-21 15:57:25)
Offline
filesystem-2008.02-2 is in Testing, all known bugs fixed
to live is to die
Offline
Cannot give any date, but new ISOs are planned to be released soon (which means - as soon as they will be ready for testing).
Thanks for the update. Looking forward to them.
Offline
A 2.6.24 based ISO would be good for people who encrypt the disk before installing Arch, because the new kernel supports the XTS block cipher.
Nah, that's still experimental and i wouldn't rely on that. It only brings you more security if you encrypt your swap with it, for standard partitions like /home or so aes/twofish-lrn-benbi is more than sufficient. If one is totally paranoid, he should use serpent.
Offline
ekerazha wrote:A 2.6.24 based ISO would be good for people who encrypt the disk before installing Arch, because the new kernel supports the XTS block cipher.
Nah, that's still experimental and i wouldn't rely on that. It only brings you more security if you encrypt your swap with it, for standard partitions like /home or so aes/twofish-lrn-benbi is more than sufficient. If one is totally paranoid, he should use serpent.
LRW-benbi is experimental too, the only "stable" block cipher is the CBC one. XTS is more secure than both LRW and CBC(-essiv).
Offline
I have very slow boot after updated to the new initscripts in testing:
http://bugs.archlinux.org/task/9648
Offline
yes me too
Linux je jako mušketýři "jeden za všechny, všichni za jednoho"
Offline
New initscripts are slower abaout 10 second my pc, but main problem of speed is udev, witj new udev and new initscripts my computer starting 1m and 30s to X, with old initscript and new udev its about 1m and 20s but with old initscripts and old udev its 35 s
Linux je jako mušketýři "jeden za všechny, všichni za jednoho"
Offline
could we please move discussion of udev (not initscripts) slowness to another topic?
this has nothing to do with 2007.11-0.4
and btw, "old initscript and new udev its about 1m and 20s" should not work at all because they check for start_udev which doesn't exist in new udev, and thus fall back to static /dev and startup fails because no /dev/sda* exists
Last edited by Romashka (2008-02-23 10:10:06)
to live is to die
Offline
and btw, "old initscript and new udev its about 1m and 20s" should not work at all because they check for start_udev which doesn't exist in new udev, and thus fall back to static /dev and startup fails because no /dev/sda* exists
Yshould work, because a copy start_udev from old udev package
Linux je jako mušketýři "jeden za všechny, všichni za jednoho"
Offline
Still no news about the new ISO?
Offline
read mailing list
http://archlinux.org/pipermail/arch-dev … 05228.html
http://archlinux.org/pipermail/arch-dev … 05122.html
Linux je jako mušketýři "jeden za všechny, všichni za jednoho"
Offline
Thank you, the last time I checked there wasn't anything about that.
Offline
New isos available for testing.
locking now, please continue here:
http://bbs.archlinux.org/viewtopic.php?id=45897
Offline