You are not logged in.
Well, I got to the point of installing xorg in pacman while installing Arch Linux. I then ran Xorg -configure to generate a configuration file. When I started X using that config file, it used h and v sync which were out of range for my monitor. Can't believe Arch is THIS difficult to install. Is it possible to copy over my config file from Ubuntu?
Offline
Yes, you can copy your ubuntu file (as long as you make sure that you have the correct xf86-video-* drivers installed).
Xorg does not depend on a particular distribution. I think it's not a problem with *arch*, it's a problem with xorg.
Remember, wiki is your friend. Also, beginner's guide is an interesting read.
Offline
I don't see why not. What have you got to lose?
Offline
Can't believe Arch is THIS difficult to install. Is it possible to copy over my config file from Ubuntu?
s/Arch/xorg/
just remember to use arch's xorg.conf fontpath.
Last edited by hacosta (2008-03-21 04:53:21)
Offline
Well, I got to the point of installing xorg in pacman while installing Arch Linux. I then ran Xorg -configure to generate a configuration file. When I started X using that config file, it used h and v sync which were out of range for my monitor. Can't believe Arch is THIS difficult to install. Is it possible to copy over my config file from Ubuntu?
Please realize that the Arch Linux installation method and procedure may be very different from other GNU/Linux distributions you have tried, especially if you are a beginner. Typically, GNU/Linux distributions bundle together large quantities of software onto a CD, or set of CD's, (or even DVD's) including a default desktop environment, default programs and settings, hardware autoconfiguration and a graphical installer, all of which are chosen for you. In contrast, the Arch Linux system is built up by the user, from an ncurses installer and base system with nothing more than a bash shell and basic command line tools. Unlike the more rigid structures of most other distributions, there are no default environments nor configurations chosen for the user. From the command line, you will add packages from the Arch repositories using the pacman tool via your internet connection and manually configure your installation until your system is customized to your requirements. This method allows for maximum flexibility, choice, and system resource control from the base up. Because you assemble and configure it, you will invariably know the nuts and bolts of your system, and become familiar with what is under the hood.
Arch is a tool to be molded by the user.
The Arch Linux system is configured by editing text files. It offers no GUI tools and will not hold your hand during setup and customization, but nor will it get in your way by design. Remember also, that Arch Linux is aimed at competent GNU/Linux users as well as users who are willing to invest the time to learn about the underlying mechanics of the system.
And yes, there is a good chance that a usable xorg.conf from Ubuntu will work on Arch.
Arch should be fun, not frustrating. If these issues are headaches rather than challenges, you may not be ready to use it yet, or it may not be for you.
We want you to enjoy Arch on your computer- not curse at it. If the [Arch Way] is awkward or uncomfortable for you, there is nothing wrong with using something else.
On the other hand, if you look at it differently, you may realize that by merit of the fact that Ubuntu works on your machine, you can be 99% assured that Arch will also work, but it is you who must manually configure it and get it running.
Ubuntu is like riding in the cab of a car, Arch is like flying a 747 from a cockpit full of switches, buttons and knobs.
It may look daunting at first, but if a human being can do it, you can do it.
The question is, do you enjoy it, or is it a nuisance? Only you can decide.
Offline
I got it to work. It was my mistake. I didn't install the proper drivers. Thanks for the info guys!
Offline