You are not logged in.
Pages: 1
We have the latest gnome has been released, but it's not stable in Archlinux. I'm wondering what gnome from www.gnome.org and gnome in archlinux repository have in common - according to stability? Why software that is released as a final version, which is actually stable, doesn't hit the main repository? What's wrong with porting? I am not accusing anyone of speed, i am just curious about such issue.
Offline
We have the latest gnome has been released, but it's not stable in Archlinux. I'm wondering what gnome from www.gnome.org and gnome in archlinux repository have in common - according to stability? Why software that is released as a final version, which is actually stable, doesn't hit the main repository? What's wrong with porting? I am not accusing anyone of speed, i am just curious about such issue.
Porting? Do you actually mean patching?
Why not just get 2.22 from [unstable] ? edit: [testing]
Last edited by Misfit138 (2008-04-02 01:10:51)
Offline
2.22 is in [testing] isn't it?
It's available, just not by default so bugs can be ironed out in the packaging and waiting for some other (gcc I think) updates to hit the main repos
Offline
Any major upstream release will go to our testing repo first, regardless of how stable it is considered to be. That's just good practice for any distro.
Offline
2.22 is in [testing] isn't it?
It's available, just not by default so bugs can be ironed out in the packaging and waiting for some other (gcc I think) updates to hit the main repos
[testing]. Right you are.
Offline
...and I won't call Gnome 2.22 stable.
Offline
Pages: 1