You are not logged in.
No distro only FreeBSD. Stable,Secure and smart.
| ruskprick @ irc | simple is smart |
Offline
Debian: Depending of what version, it is very stable to run as a server. you also have the comming Ubuntu server LTS. They have good hardwaresupport.
Dunno how good apt-get is to remove metapackages, it had some problems in the past.
Offline
Linux... mmm, maybe Debian.
FreeBSD is nice too.
Well, my favourite is Solaris/OpenSolaris.
Last edited by ekerazha (2008-04-13 17:38:47)
Offline
Debian - install once, use all the time.
Using with testing repo (so no out of date apps) for 2 years now, and everything just works.
Offline
Korey Kaczynski wrote:Why is OpenBSD better than FreeBSD?
Define "better". For a server platform, it could be considered "better" since it has more emphasis on security. FreeBSD focuses on being a usable and stable, OpenBSD places first through fifth priority on security.
Well, some people are recommending OpenBSD over FreeBSD, so it's deemed to be better for whatever they're using it for.
I was aware of the security awesomeness of OpenBSD, but what else is there that puts it above FreeBSD?
Offline
Not many mentions of it here, but CentOS. Been considering Arch because of how much I like it as a desktop distro but not sure on how suitable it is...
Offline
I'm using debian (etch), it's very stable, package management is simple with aptitude, there are security updates.. what do you want more?
Offline