Arch Linux

dolby

Member

From: 1992

Registered: 2006-08-08

Posts: 1,581

Re: dwm config

you will always get that. its no error to worry about. happens in wmii too btw

---

There shouldn't be any reason to learn more editor types than emacs or vi -- mg (1)
[You learn that sarcasm does not often work well in international forums.  That is why we avoid it. -- ewaller (arch linux forum moderator)

strankan

Member

From: Sundsvall - Sweden

Registered: 2006-11-08

Posts: 97

Re: dwm config

The weird thing is that it didn't allow me to start X at all. But after a quick reboot X starts again. Oh well, back to tweaking the config

dolby

Member

From: 1992

Registered: 2006-08-08

Posts: 1,581

Re: dwm config

the fontset thing is 100% irrelevant with it

---

There shouldn't be any reason to learn more editor types than emacs or vi -- mg (1)
[You learn that sarcasm does not often work well in international forums.  That is why we avoid it. -- ewaller (arch linux forum moderator)

nDray

Member

From: Portugal

Registered: 2007-01-21

Posts: 143

Website

Re: dwm config

I am using this config.h and a small c program to pipe information, because I believe in performance (bash script doing the same with grep, cat, sed, cut used some cpu from time to time...).

This is the result.

I still have to figure out some intuitive hotkeys to control mpd, but I am uncertain about some statistics collection.

I'm calculating the cpu load from /proc/uptime, since the first value is the total time and the second is the idle time. I get the rare ocasion that my app calculates negative usage!!! xD Should I calculate it from somewhere else?

My biggest question, though, is about memory usage. Which value effectively represents the memory being used by running programs? I am using active because it seems coherent, but I believe it's not correct....

Also, do you agree with my excuse to use doubles? I never really though of it that much....