You are not logged in.
So, xfs vs jfs. Which one?
Offline
If you are leaving ext3, then I'd go JFS. No particular reason though...
Offline
If you are leaving ext3, then I'd go JFS. No particular reason though...
But doesn't xfs have an online defrag tool? What about JFS? I've searched for the differences, but comparison between these two is hard to come by.
Last edited by solarwind (2008-04-30 13:14:49)
Offline
XFS does have an online defrag tool. I guess I choose JFS for you because I have never heard of it corrupting files but I have for XFS. I'm mainly basing this on old Arch bug reports though...
Offline
XFS does have an online defrag tool. I guess I choose JFS for you because I have never heard of it corrupting files but I have for XFS. I'm mainly basing this on old Arch bug reports though...
I'm mainly concerned with losing data due to power outages. Do you think xfs will hold up to that?
Offline
I'm mainly concerned with losing data due to power outages. Do you think xfs will hold up to that?
All journaled file systems should.
Offline
Offline
I personally would stay awya from XFS, use it if you deal with many large files, and don't use it on /var since it is super slow on small files. JFS is CPU friendly, it hit the CPU gently.
But does JFS have a defrag tool?
Offline
I'm using JFS here on all of my partitions and have for years. I've also never had a problem with data loss or corruption. I solved the issue of power outage induced corruption by hooking my system up to a small UPS battery backup. The battery is rated for 850W max load and runs my workstation for 20 minutes on power failure. I would suggest anyone seriously concerned with power failure invest the money to get one.
Offline
I like JFS.
JFS only has online defragmentation ability on UNIX, like HP-UX, not GNU/Linux.
I believe XFS is the only GNU/Linux FS with defrag at this time.
Offline