New pacman utility, rebuild and optimize packages from source

bladdo · 2008-05-24 12:18:56

Looks very nice

pacguy?

aRcHaTe · 2008-05-24 14:25:37

Cimi wrote:

the output should be much better now when taking into account dependencies.
Also, I've fixed all the checks behind dependencies, so when it fails it will print what was wrong (missing dependency, makepkg error, general error...)

but it isnt fetching the dependicies...its going GREAT...i guess it lacks this one...

Cimi · 2008-05-24 14:30:02

I'm fixing the output and some checks... will commit in 10 mins
btw you can already fetch dependencies with --builddeps... see --help for the usage!

aRcHaTe · 2008-05-24 14:31:54

pacbuild?

aRcHaTe · 2008-05-24 14:32:36

Cimi wrote:

I'm fixing the output and some checks... will commit in 10 mins
btw you can already fetch dependencies with --builddeps... see --help for the usage!

hoo great ill test it

Cimi · 2008-05-24 14:44:32

committed

Last edited by Cimi (2008-05-24 14:46:27)

aRcHaTe · 2008-05-24 14:51:47

Cimi wrote:

http://img165.imageshack.us/img165/5209 … ot5kh0.png
committed

Cimi i just submited a pkgbuild of pacbuilder on aur..hope u dont mind...its easier to update until it gets more stable and until then am wealing to test it..so if u dont agree..just say ill delete it keep the great work man

Last edited by aRcHaTe (2008-05-24 14:52:54)

Cimi · 2008-05-24 15:04:43

aRcHaTe wrote:

Cimi wrote:
http://img165.imageshack.us/img165/5209 … ot5kh0.png
committed
Cimi i just submited a pkgbuild of pacbuilder on aur..hope u dont mind...its easier to update until it gets more stable and until then am wealing to test it..so if u dont agree..just say ill delete it keep the great work man

I would like to chose the name before...

aRcHaTe · 2008-05-24 15:15:11

Cimi wrote:

aRcHaTe wrote:
Cimi wrote:
http://img165.imageshack.us/img165/5209 … ot5kh0.png
committed
Cimi i just submited a pkgbuild of pacbuilder on aur..hope u dont mind...its easier to update until it gets more stable and until then am wealing to test it..so if u dont agree..just say ill delete it keep the great work man
I would like to chose the name before...

ok ill delete it and submitted later

aRcHaTe · 2008-05-24 15:35:41

scbc?
"script created by cimi"
heheh
abspac?
pacsys?
pacore?

here it is hehe

Last edited by aRcHaTe (2008-05-24 15:41:21)

Cimi · 2008-05-24 15:37:27

please don't spam, use edit button

Flying Saxman · 2008-05-24 16:15:20

pinp - pinp is not portage...

Misfit138 · 2008-05-24 16:30:53

Beautiful work, Cimi. You really filled a niche that makeworld was unable to fill for a while, IMO.
A few of the suggested names are good. I like KISS names like makepkg, and PKGBUILD, so to me 'rebuild' 'remake' 'resource' or 'sourcebuild' sound appropriate.
I wonder if you may consider eventually submitting your code as a feature request to be merged ?

Cimi · 2008-05-24 16:35:38

Misfit138 wrote:

Beautiful work, Cimi. You really filled a niche that makeworld was unable to fill for a while, IMO.
A few of the suggested names are good.
I wonder if you may consider submitting your code as a feature request to be merged ?

I guess it should be better to leave it separated... because this project started to fix makeworld but then got a lot of new features... see --help

Abadaar · 2008-05-24 16:37:39

I like the "pacguy" name, even though it isn't really descriptive.

pacwoman on the other hand is, package (with optimizations) manager.

Cimi · 2008-05-24 16:39:33

for the names I prefer so far:
pacbuild
pacbuilder
repacker
rebuild

Misfit138 · 2008-05-24 16:52:47

Cimi wrote:

for the names I prefer so far:
pacbuild
pacbuilder
repacker
rebuild

Repacker is nice, maybe a twist on spelling; 'repac'

Cimi · 2008-05-24 17:03:19

the issue is that the tool is not just for repacking, but also just for packing. you can install from aur or upgrade your system, and that means simple packing.
it is repacking just when the package is already installed and has the same version

Last edited by Cimi (2008-05-24 17:20:53)

bangkok_manouel · 2008-05-24 17:17:52

construct

Cimi · 2008-05-24 17:20:08

fixed a bug when building multiple deps and a bug when upgrading svn packages from aur.
if someone now wants to patch pacbuilder to have --flags etc etc like pacman, yeah should be very appreciated

Last edited by Cimi (2008-05-24 22:17:57)

Cimi · 2008-05-24 21:17:24

fixed a small bug on output

Flying Saxman · 2008-05-25 08:58:36

I just googled to find out how "Ms. Pac-Man" is called, what her name is. Wikipedia said that she was called "Pepper" in the Pac-Man-TV-series. I think it would be a nice little joke to call your project "pepper" as it is somehow the "wife of pacman".

aRcHaTe · 2008-05-25 10:13:42

Cimi wrote:

fixed a small bug on output

i left the pc compiling all night but even with --builddeps i get a lot of missing dependecies..
==> Building zenity [package 895 of 899] ...
missing dependency!
==> Building zip [package 896 of 899] ...

whats missing?

aRcHaTe · 2008-05-25 10:16:29

pacwan "the force is stronge with u my son" XD
pacworld

Cimi · 2008-05-25 10:17:53

you've added the wrong flag, with --builddeps it prints the name of the deps

[cimi@aries ~]$ sudo pacbuilder --extra --builddeps
Password: 
-------------------------------
 PacBuilder, by Andrea Cimitan 
-------------------------------

==> ATTENTION: Previous build detected. Do you want to resume? (y/n): y

Resuming...
==> Building alacarte [package 1 of 478] ... makepkg failed!
==> Building amule [package 2 of 478] ... depends on crypto++!
==> Building crypto++ [makedependency of amule] ...

Last edited by Cimi (2008-05-25 10:38:45)

Arch Linux

#76 2008-05-24 12:18:56

Re: New pacman utility, rebuild and optimize packages from source

#77 2008-05-24 14:25:37

Re: New pacman utility, rebuild and optimize packages from source

#78 2008-05-24 14:30:02

Re: New pacman utility, rebuild and optimize packages from source

#79 2008-05-24 14:31:54

Re: New pacman utility, rebuild and optimize packages from source

#80 2008-05-24 14:32:36

Re: New pacman utility, rebuild and optimize packages from source

#81 2008-05-24 14:44:32

Re: New pacman utility, rebuild and optimize packages from source

#82 2008-05-24 14:51:47

Re: New pacman utility, rebuild and optimize packages from source

#83 2008-05-24 15:04:43

Re: New pacman utility, rebuild and optimize packages from source

#84 2008-05-24 15:15:11

Re: New pacman utility, rebuild and optimize packages from source

#85 2008-05-24 15:35:41

Re: New pacman utility, rebuild and optimize packages from source

#86 2008-05-24 15:37:27

Re: New pacman utility, rebuild and optimize packages from source

#87 2008-05-24 16:15:20

Re: New pacman utility, rebuild and optimize packages from source

#88 2008-05-24 16:30:53

Re: New pacman utility, rebuild and optimize packages from source

#89 2008-05-24 16:35:38

Re: New pacman utility, rebuild and optimize packages from source

#90 2008-05-24 16:37:39

Re: New pacman utility, rebuild and optimize packages from source

#91 2008-05-24 16:39:33

Re: New pacman utility, rebuild and optimize packages from source

#92 2008-05-24 16:52:47

Re: New pacman utility, rebuild and optimize packages from source

#93 2008-05-24 17:03:19

Re: New pacman utility, rebuild and optimize packages from source

#94 2008-05-24 17:17:52

Re: New pacman utility, rebuild and optimize packages from source

#95 2008-05-24 17:20:08

Re: New pacman utility, rebuild and optimize packages from source

#96 2008-05-24 21:17:24

Re: New pacman utility, rebuild and optimize packages from source

#97 2008-05-25 08:58:36

Re: New pacman utility, rebuild and optimize packages from source

#98 2008-05-25 10:13:42

Re: New pacman utility, rebuild and optimize packages from source

#99 2008-05-25 10:16:29

Re: New pacman utility, rebuild and optimize packages from source

#100 2008-05-25 10:17:53

Re: New pacman utility, rebuild and optimize packages from source

Board footer