You are not logged in.
Pages: 1
I'm not sure how long its been here, I think since yesterday, maybe the day before. But I have an empty file called '2.6.26' sitting in my home directory, /home/zack/. It is readable by users, but owned by root. Did 'Something Bad' happen to my system, or maybe it was a kernel upgrade?
Idk..
[zack@boxxy ~]$ pacman -Q | grep kernel
kernel-headers 2.6.24.3-1
kernel26 2.6.25.4-1
[zack@boxxy ~]$
[root@boxxy zack]# pacman -Q | grep filesystem
filesystem 2008.03-2
[root@boxxy zack]#
I just did a pacman -Syu so I am up to date.
-Zack
Last edited by Sjoden (2008-06-11 00:17:59)
Offline
Same here.
$ ls -la 2.6.26
-rw-r--r-- 1 root root 0 9. Jun 00:19 2.6.26
I deleted it, but it came back.
It is what you make it. Even if you don't know what to make it.
Offline
Try doing 'pacman -Qo 2.6.26' to find out which package owns it..
I have the same kernel/kernel-header version installed but no such file exists in my home.
Offline
# pacman -Qo 2.6.26
Fehler: Kein Paket besitzt 2.6.26
Um, something like "error: no package owns 2.6.26".
Last edited by Mimi (2008-06-11 22:50:19)
It is what you make it. Even if you don't know what to make it.
Offline
I don't know if pm-utils or uswsusp creates it when suspending, but it's there again when system is resumed.
You need to install an RTFM interface.
Offline
I recently tested suspend, maybe that's why this file appeared suddenly and was not there before.
Last edited by Mimi (2008-06-11 22:10:32)
It is what you make it. Even if you don't know what to make it.
Offline
Heh, just the other day I tried pm-hibernate.
The log files say it hibernated correctly, but after that they are blank. Booting it back up was a normal bootup, didn't remember I was logged in, or what programs were open or anything.
-Zack
Offline
I've got it too . Still no ideas?
Offline
Possibly. A couple of uneventful experiments with hibernation several days ago. Before the last system upgrade, IIRC.
Offline
I have the same file. It seems to move around a little bit though . . . I found it in another directory that I was working in.
Offline
maybe it happens because of a failure? Maybe failing to come up correctly, idk.
There are no error messages. It seems like the file is created while suspending.
bash-3.2# cat /var/log/pm-suspend.log
Initial commandline parameters:
Do 12. Jun 19:39:41 CEST 2008: Running hooks for suspend.
/usr/lib/pm-utils/sleep.d/00clear suspend: success.
/usr/lib/pm-utils/sleep.d/01grub suspend: not applicable.
/usr/lib/pm-utils/sleep.d/05led suspend: not applicable.
/usr/lib/pm-utils/sleep.d/10NetworkManager suspend: success.
/usr/lib/pm-utils/sleep.d/11netcfg suspend: success.
/usr/lib/pm-utils/sleep.d/49bluetooth suspend: not applicable.
/usr/lib/pm-utils/sleep.d/50modules suspend: not applicable.
/usr/lib/pm-utils/sleep.d/55battery suspend: success.
/usr/lib/pm-utils/sleep.d/65alsa suspend: success.
/usr/lib/pm-utils/sleep.d/90clock suspend: success.
/usr/lib/pm-utils/sleep.d/94cpufreq suspend: success.
/usr/lib/pm-utils/sleep.d/95led suspend: not applicable.
/usr/lib/pm-utils/sleep.d/98smart-kernel-video suspend: success.
/usr/lib/pm-utils/sleep.d/99video suspend: success.
Do 12. Jun 19:39:43 CEST 2008: performing suspend
Do 12. Jun 20:09:24 CEST 2008: Awake.
Do 12. Jun 20:09:24 CEST 2008: Running hooks for resume
/usr/lib/pm-utils/sleep.d/99video resume: success.
/usr/lib/pm-utils/sleep.d/98smart-kernel-video resume: success.
/usr/lib/pm-utils/sleep.d/95led resume: not applicable.
/usr/lib/pm-utils/sleep.d/94cpufreq resume: success.
/usr/lib/pm-utils/sleep.d/90clock resume: success.
/usr/lib/pm-utils/sleep.d/65alsa resume: success.
/usr/lib/pm-utils/sleep.d/55battery resume: success.
/usr/lib/pm-utils/sleep.d/50modules resume: success.
/usr/lib/pm-utils/sleep.d/49bluetooth resume: not applicable.
/usr/lib/pm-utils/sleep.d/11netcfg resume: success.
/usr/lib/pm-utils/sleep.d/10NetworkManager resume: success.
/usr/lib/pm-utils/sleep.d/05led resume: not applicable.
/usr/lib/pm-utils/sleep.d/01grub resume: not applicable.
/usr/lib/pm-utils/sleep.d/00clear resume: success.
Do 12. Jun 20:09:24 CEST 2008: Finished.
/usr/lib/pm-utils/functions: line 39: 9277 Aufgelegt sleep 20
ls -l 2.6.26
-rw-r--r-- 1 root root 0 12. Jun 19:39 2.6.26
Last edited by Mimi (2008-06-12 19:13:40)
It is what you make it. Even if you don't know what to make it.
Offline
It is what you make it. Even if you don't know what to make it.
Offline
same here. So, we are waiting for an update of the pm-utils package ?
Offline
# pacman -Qo 2.6.26 Fehler: Kein Paket besitzt 2.6.26
Um, something like "error: no package owns 2.6.26".
I'm afraid pacman doesn't do relative paths when you ask it to query for file ownership.
pacman -Qo /path/to/wherever/2.6.26/is/at
is a lot more useful, that way it actually knows what file you are trying to query and it can filter through its database.
Got Leenucks? :: Arch: Power in simplicity :: Get Counted! Registered Linux User #392717 :: Blog thingy
Offline
I'm afraid pacman doesn't do relative paths when you ask it to query for file ownership.
Pacman has super cow powers, too.
$ cd /usr/share/gnuplot/
$ ls
4.2 gnuplot.gih
$ pacman -Qo gnuplot.gih
gnuplot.gih ist in gnuplot 4.2.3-1 enthalten
same here. So, we are waiting for an update of the pm-utils package ?
Oh no, i'll miss the file!
-- Mimi
It is what you make it. Even if you don't know what to make it.
Offline
Edit: it only works if you are in the dir itself where the file is present. So not that much 'super cow powers' if you ask me.
Specifying the path gives you what you need, and it's not that big a hassle to do so.
Last edited by B (2008-07-22 21:55:45)
Got Leenucks? :: Arch: Power in simplicity :: Get Counted! Registered Linux User #392717 :: Blog thingy
Offline
Pages: 1