You are not logged in.

#1 2004-08-14 12:16:42

Fox
Member
Registered: 2004-07-28
Posts: 124

United Arch Project

I had an idea. All Arch users are posting their pkgbuilds in this forum. But if you need a program you have to search for it. That's slow and inefficent.

my idea wrote:

Users save their pkgbuilds by using an webinterface in a big database. If a user needs a pkgbuild, the user uses a program (maybe developed by myself) to lookup if there's a pkgbuild with the version he needs in the database. If the pkgbuild is available the program will copy it to the abs folder and build and install the package. This will be a efficent and fast way to get thousands of packages.

It's just an idea. But I think a good one.

Fox

Offline

#2 2004-08-14 13:21:42

KalephOne
Member
From: Fortaleza, Brasil
Registered: 2004-04-02
Posts: 99

Re: United Arch Project

There is a project pretty close to what you're thinking
http://bbs.archlinux.org/viewtopic.php?t=3458

rasat wrote:

Arch Incoming Register is open for all Archers to list user contributed packages. To manage and also to follow up packages to Trust User Repos. Here also Archers can check what other packages are available beside Current and Extra.

The database operates in a Wiki style where users can freely add, edit, move and remove package names. The packages are divided in categories, type of package, and name of the Trust User maintaining packages considering for final approval for Arch Linux official repo.

Its still in an experimental stage to have an idea if useful and will remain in my server until then.
http://bliss-solutions.org/archlinux/incoming/index.php


Kaleph
jabber: kaleph@jabber.org

Offline

#3 2004-08-14 14:28:09

Fox
Member
Registered: 2004-07-28
Posts: 124

Re: United Arch Project

But It has no client.

Offline

#4 2004-08-14 14:40:39

cjdj
Member
From: Perth, Western Australia
Registered: 2004-05-07
Posts: 121

Re: United Arch Project

Fox wrote:

Users save their pkgbuilds by using an webinterface in a big database.

I've often wished for a system like this, and actually considered making one myself, but the problem that I kept wrestling with, is that the quality of the PKGBUILDS for a lot of the new user contributed packages is not very good.  Making a somewhat automated system removes a lot of the checks and balances that works quite well with the forum system.

If someone posts a PKGBUILD to the forum, and it has problems with it, then people post to the forum pointing out the problems and generally fixing the mistakes.

Creating an automated submittal process that removes that level of personal interaction is likely to fail due to poor quality packages.   

I mean, that is the whole point of the Trusted Users anyway.   We trust them, because they have proven that they can produce good quality packages.

But I am certainly not going to knock you for trying to build on arch and improve on it.   So good luck with it.

Offline

#5 2004-08-14 15:10:51

contrasutra
Member
From: New Jersey
Registered: 2003-07-26
Posts: 507

Re: United Arch Project

Read this thread: http://bbs.archlinux.org/viewtopic.php?t=4112
And the followup: http://bbs.archlinux.org/viewtopic.php?t=4300

And this:
http://xentac.net/~jchu/submission/submission.html

Otherwise another flame war will ensue.

EDIT: And participate in this ongoing thread on the TUR list:
http://www.archlinux.org/pipermail/tur- … 00231.html

(there's other threads where we discussed this as well, search around)


"Contrary to popular belief, penguins are not the salvation of modern technology.  Neither do they throw parties for the urban proletariat."

Offline

#6 2004-08-14 15:19:23

Fox
Member
Registered: 2004-07-28
Posts: 124

Re: United Arch Project

I don't like the TUR Project (it sounds if they are something better as normal users). But if nobody likes my idea it makes no sense to develop the system.

Fox

Offline

#7 2004-08-14 15:55:03

hypermegachi
Member
Registered: 2004-07-25
Posts: 311

Re: United Arch Project

why don't we use a wiki type system.  then when there are problems people can go in and correct them.

Offline

#8 2004-08-14 16:46:25

sarah31
Member
From: Middle of Canada
Registered: 2002-08-20
Posts: 2,975
Website

Re: United Arch Project

what about patches and such.

Fox, anyone can be a TUR so stop whining. i don't use TURs myself because there are no packages there I need.

the system that is being designed will work so there is no need to design a parallel system.


AKA uknowme

I am not your friend

Offline

#9 2004-08-15 02:20:48

jlvsimoes
Member
From: portugal
Registered: 2002-12-23
Posts: 392
Website

Re: United Arch Project

so be a tur make 3 pkgbuilds maintain it updated and  u r set  to go  betther
take a couple of ones that i did and go you can do it smile


-----BEGIN GEEK CODE BLOCK-----
Version: 3.1
GU/ d- s: a- C L U P+ L+++ E--- W+
N 0+ K- W-- !O !M V-- PS+ PE- V++ PGP T 5 Z+ R* TV+ B+
DI-- D- G-- e-- h! r++ z+ z*
------END GEEK CODE BLOCK------

Offline

#10 2004-08-16 06:38:28

dpb
Member
From: Cyperspace?
Registered: 2004-04-11
Posts: 231

Re: United Arch Project

Why not setup an open cvs server where people can send their PKGBUILDs? Then people could set a new abs entry and just use abs to get the PKGBUILDs or use a web cvs interface to look for the PKGBUILD.

Offline

#11 2004-08-16 07:45:23

dp
Member
From: Aarau, Switzerland
Registered: 2003-05-27
Posts: 3,378
Website

Re: United Arch Project

a new system, the AUR is in developement


The impossible missions are the only ones which succeed.

Offline

Board footer

Powered by FluxBB