You are not logged in.
INCSlayer wrote:i do it when im bored
Phew, i'm not alone with this...
I'm that bored, I just updated my notebook, my server, both my stable and testing building chroots... and now I am telling people about it on the forums
Online
wonder wrote:heleos wrote:I probably do it once an hour...
many users that do it like you complain about missing dependency after kernel update from for e.g 2.6.24, 2.6.25 or other major upgrade .
i'm upgrading only if i need the software (new feature) and only after i check forum, bug to see if are problems. thats why i never screw up my archlinux box. i'm using arch for 2 years
Best answer.
Personally, I do it about once a week.
Ya I try to update my arch box's every week or two unless I have an issue that needs to be resolved more immediately.
Updating every hour is just wasteful I think. That and to do it every hour I would think it's an automatic cron task which is often not a great idea I have found in the past, best to review the updates prior to install.
Last edited by Zepp (2008-07-11 07:06:08)
Offline
I just upgrade whenever I feel like it -- it ranges from daily to fortnightly for me.
Seriously, though -- updating every hour? If nothing else, you're probably making quite some traffic for your mirror. I remember that Gentoo sync servers contained a message saying that syncing more than once a day was considered abuse.
Offline
I probably do it once an hour...
I plead guilty too. It's just stronger than me
Maybe I do it even more, I didn't check on it yet. Would be an interesting experiment.
Got Leenucks? :: Arch: Power in simplicity :: Get Counted! Registered Linux User #392717 :: Blog thingy
Offline
I use yaourt instead of pacman for my system (I don't have to sudo ). I will admit I do it around 2-3 times a day.
My Rigs:
- Mid-2007 iMac 20", Intel 2GHz Core 2 Duo, 2x1GB DDR2-800, 250GB SATA HDD, and...MIGHTY MOUSE!!! , OSX 10.5 Leopard, ATI Radeon 2400XT 128MB
- HP zv6203cl, AMD Athlon 64 3200 S939, 2x512MB DDR400, 80GB 4200rpm HDD, ATI Radeon Xpress 200M 128MB, Arch i686
- 1986 Gibson SG Junior Cherry Red, Ibanez 15W amp, DigiTech RP250 modeling processor
Offline
Updating every hour is just wasteful I think. That and to do it every hour I would think it's an automatic cron task which is often not a great idea I have found in the past, best to review the updates prior to install.
your excessive practicality looms like a dark cloud over my parade of foolishness.
Offline
heleos wrote:I probably do it once an hour...
many users that do it like you complain about missing dependency after kernel update from for e.g 2.6.24, 2.6.25 or other major upgrade .
i'm upgrading only if i need the software (new feature) and only after i check forum, bug to see if are problems. thats why i never screw up my archlinux box. i'm using arch for 2 years
Oh my, you are missing all the fun in breaking your system, I mean is there much more in using a computer than breaking your system?
Offline
Oh my, you are missing all the fun in breaking your system, I mean is there much more in using a computer than breaking your system?
from time to time i'm bored because my archlinux didn't broke but i managed once to break it badly. file system corruption
Last edited by wonder (2008-07-11 13:50:17)
Give what you have. To someone, it may be better than you dare to think.
Offline
I run it every couple of days on my desktop and about once a week or os on the other computers on my network that run arch.
I haven't lost my mind; I have a tape back-up somewhere.
Twitter
Offline
from time to time i'm bored because my archlinux didn't broke
I hear kensai recommends using "mv" to merge .pacnew files in order to break your system.
Online
I have an RSS ticker reading off the package update list. If something I want updated comes up, I update. This usually happens once or twice a day, less often if I'm on a "let's play with testing a while" binge.
: () { : | :& } ;:
Offline
I have a script that tells me when there are updates.. Usually I update whenever I see there are updates.
Offline
two or three times a day. depends on which packages have been released and if there are any bug reports concerning packages which could harm my system.
Offline
Right now, I have a rather bleak diskspace situation (1.8GB for /, 1.4GB for ~, I do have 15GB available on my server in / if I need it), but once I get a somewhat more spacious HDD (45GB for / anybody?), I'll probably enable my closest mirror, download the entire repo (or at least half of it anyway, beats doing it slowly over the course of a few years), enable every mirror, and then have an RSS checker check the package feed every 15 minutes. When there's an update, I'll have it pacman it in silently then notify me. Popups saying "Your kernel has just been upgraded to 2.6.30. Please put rebooting on your todo list" FTW!
-dav7
Last edited by dav7 (2008-07-21 04:05:50)
Windows was made for looking at success from a distance through a wall of oversimplicity. Linux removes the wall, so you can just walk up to success and make it your own.
--
Reinventing the wheel is fun. You get to redefine pi.
Offline
Mainly just to keep the size of the update manageable I do it about once a fortnight unless something I'm upto inspires/requires an -Syu.
I used to be surprised that I was still surprised by my own stupidity, finding it strangely refreshing.
Well, now I don't find it refreshing.
I'm over it!
Offline