You are not logged in.
Pages: 1
http://www.hackosis.com/2008/11/03/linu … tem-up-40/
Wondered if anyone has any thoughts on this article?
MrG
Mr Green I like Landuke!
Offline
I have been using noatime, works fine.
I will set nodiratime too now, didn't know that existed.
Do these work for XFS too?
EDIT: man mount says XFS can do noatime. I guess it can't hurt to just put both of these for all filesystems.
Last edited by Procyon (2008-11-03 16:58:20)
Offline
Think it relates more to ext3... atm all I have in fstab is defaults
Mr Green I like Landuke!
Offline
Well that's an old trick, but yes, it helps a lot.
Offline
very quiet thread maybe Archers use something other than ext3
Mr Green I like Landuke!
Offline
very quiet thread maybe Archers use something other than ext3
No no, thats just the things ppl automatically do when installing...
I think even ubuntu has that on by default. Afaik noatime is enough, nodiratime comes with it.
Offline
Latest ubuntu seems to have relatime and .... I didn't know about this (guess I didn't read the wiki properly or it got changed meanwhile) .... I'm starting with relatime and see if everything keeps working as it should (I suspect it will) then I'll move on to noatime,nodiratime.
I've read that noatime is a superset of nodiratime but by reading the man page I get the feeling they are two separate things and you need to use both to do the trick.
R00KIE
Tm90aGluZyB0byBzZWUgaGVyZSwgbW92ZSBhbG9uZy4K
Offline
/dev/sda2 / ext3 defaults 0 1
Emmm my fstab is about 5 years old :-) .... guess its me who is living in the past
Just checked Ubuntu its showing
relatime, errors=remount-ro
Boing!
Last edited by Mr Green (2008-11-05 09:28:59)
Mr Green I like Landuke!
Offline
Boing!
Mr Green I like Landuke!
Offline
Yes I know, I asked a friend that is trying ubuntu to cat his fstab
But I've moved to noatime,nodiratime. No other options besides the defaults and it seems to be working very well. Fam doesn't seem to hang that much (at all) now but thats something for another thread I guess.
R00KIE
Tm90aGluZyB0byBzZWUgaGVyZSwgbW92ZSBhbG9uZy4K
Offline
Does this procedure mean anything when applied to raid0 array made up of three CF IDE cards?
Prediction...This year will be a very odd year!
Hard work does not kill people but why risk it: Charlie Mccarthy
A man is not complete until he is married..then..he is finished.
When ALL is lost, what can be found? Even bytes get lonely for a little bit! X-ray confirms Iam spineless!
Offline
Yes, if for every file you read you need to write back the last access time then it doesn't matter what kind of setup you have. It may be just less noticeable if the storage subsystem is faster (which is your case with raid0).
R00KIE
Tm90aGluZyB0byBzZWUgaGVyZSwgbW92ZSBhbG9uZy4K
Offline
I was using option noatime for my JFS partitions for quite a time, but haven't heard of nodirtime till now. Will see if it changes anything.
Anyone know a good HDD benchmark for Linux?
"... being a Linux user is sort of like living in a house inhabited by a large family of carpenters and architects. Every morning when you wake up, the house is a little different. Maybe there is a new turret, or some walls have moved. Or perhaps someone has temporarily removed the floor under your bed."
MSI Raider GE78HX 13VI-032PL
Offline
relatime is techincally the most compatible option. noatime implies nodiratime so its pointless...
edit: and afaik there are no fs benchmarks for linux, there are plenty of hdd benchmarks but I dont think thats what you meant?
People tend to just copy around files, time it and assume that this has some real world relevance to the FS performance
Last edited by shazeal (2008-11-27 06:30:12)
Offline
Pages: 1