You are not logged in.
Hello, guys.
I want advice on good html editor preferably wysiwyg and with free license.
thanks.
Last edited by corrupt (2008-10-30 15:57:01)
Offline
any good text editor is good for html
I'd say either vim or geany
Last edited by moljac024 (2008-10-30 16:01:10)
The day Microsoft makes a product that doesn't suck, is the day they make a vacuum cleaner.
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
But if they tell you that I've lost my mind, maybe it's not gone just a little hard to find...
Offline
Ditto the text editor recommendation. Bluefish and Quanta Plus also work well.
oz
Offline
If you prefer a wysiwyg editor, the best open source project is probably kompozer. Definitely doesn't generate perfect clean code, but it gets you started.
Offline
You'll get way farther without the WYSIWYG. Learn the HTML your self. Geany is the best IMO.
Offline
Geany +1
Matt
"It is very difficult to educate the educated."
Offline
It depends how often you are creating sites. If you are only creating a personal home page, WYSIWYG editors are perfectly fine. No need to learn a new language for something you do once or twice a year.
I understand you people obviously know your stuff, but you can't assume what the OP's usage is. Why post four responses to someone's question that doesn't answer their question?
Last edited by rsambuca (2008-10-30 18:06:53)
Offline
Is Kompozer still active ? The latest release is from 2007 ...
Offline
Geany.
Last edited by Wintervenom (2009-08-05 14:16:29)
Offline
I use emacs, geany, bluefish, editra, whatever. Mostly emacs via gnuclient. What about Amaya, though? I just fired up amaya 10 to look at it, and it seeeeemmmmms great.
Offline
So far i tried bluefish,geany and komposer.
komposer looks good, but crashes on my system(conflict with kde4?).
geany is pretty good.
Offline
Offline
I am also a geany fanboy for HTMLing
Edit: But if you really need a WYSIWYG, you might try Quantum Plus. I don't like WYSIWYGs at all, but this one is free and should do its job.
Last edited by thoughtcrime (2008-11-05 16:00:22)
- blog (about arch and other stuff): http://thoughtyblog.wordpress.com/
- x86_64 user
Offline
Another +1 for Geany, although I don't like the latest version...
But I definitely must +1 learning HTML yourself. If you do try, make absolutely sure you keep the following things in mind so you don't get confused/sidetracked/taught the wrong info:
- Tables, unlike many say, are not 100% wrong for all cases. They're just bad when you use a hidden table to hold the layout of a page together. It makes the web harder to index by search engines and also makes your HTML hard to maintain and generally very messy.
- Your best bet is to learn about HTML5 and XHTML; the latter is quite a controversial subject but at least a knowledge of it can help. I've heard a few cool things about HTML5, but sadly many browsers don't fully implement it. However, if you learn these you'll hit the ground running as you'll essentially know what the next generation of the Web will use for markup. And since I'd imagine only geeky types would focus on this sort of thing, you'll likely get very good information.
- At least get a basic grasp of CSS.
- IE is bad, no matter what anyone tells you. Force Firefox or similar on everyone you know
-dav7
Last edited by dav7 (2008-11-05 16:25:44)
Windows was made for looking at success from a distance through a wall of oversimplicity. Linux removes the wall, so you can just walk up to success and make it your own.
--
Reinventing the wheel is fun. You get to redefine pi.
Offline
+1 IE being bad!
Matt
"It is very difficult to educate the educated."
Offline
Actually, as much as I hate to say it, IE has had fewer security vulnerabilities discovered in recent years than Firefox. There is a real possibility that IE7 is a more secure browser on Windows than Firefox is.
Offline
Secure != conforming to standards, doing what's expected, etc.
Matt
"It is very difficult to educate the educated."
Offline
HTML doesn't really need anything expect good highlighting.
I'd suggest geany, nano, vim or scite.
Offline
Actually, as much as I hate to say it, IE has had fewer security vulnerabilities discovered in recent years than Firefox. There is a real possibility that IE7 is a more secure browser on Windows than Firefox is.
The difference is that Firefox on Windows updates itself everytime it starts (and Mozilla is very quick at releasing bugfixes).
IE doesn't do this, Microsoft only has their monthly patch-day.
=> Firefox is really more secure.
Last edited by thoughtcrime (2008-11-05 21:03:12)
- blog (about arch and other stuff): http://thoughtyblog.wordpress.com/
- x86_64 user
Offline
HTML doesn't really need anything expect good highlighting.
I'd say it does: a good set of macros so that one can type, e.g., <ah and get <a href="<++>"></a> with the cursor in the correct place for the href value, and then jumping between the tags with <tab>. I'm referring to the html package in vim here.
Offline
Gedit with snippets like TextMate.
Offline
Vi(m) +1
Offline
I recommend you Vim.
(I'm going to patent this phrase.)
Offline
I've started using vim in the past few days. It's awesome, and as hard as it may seem at first, vimtutor really helps.
[ lamy + pilot ] [ arch64 | wmii ] [ ati + amd ]
Offline