about clients p2p...

celeron2002 · 2004-10-23 15:34:08

is possible move aMule or azureus to extra repository??

the PKGBUILDS, are in this same forum...
but would be great, if this packages downloaded with pacman...

dp · 2004-10-23 16:41:57

celeron2002 wrote:

is possible move aMule or azureus to extra repository??

the PKGBUILDS, are in this same forum...
but would be great, if this packages downloaded with pacman...

going to have a look at the 2.0.0rc7 - azureus i don't know

dp · 2004-10-23 17:24:26

ok, i compiled 2.0.0rc7 ... but starting it, it says this:

10/23/04 19:20:05: aMule 2.0.0rc7 using wxGTK2 v2.4.2
10/23/04 19:20:05: WARNING!
10/23/04 19:20:05:  You are running aMule linked against GTK2!
10/23/04 19:20:05:  This is known to cause problems, with the version of wxWidgets that you are using,
10/23/04 19:20:05:  so it is recommended that that you recompile the nescesarry packages.
10/23/04 19:20:05:  Please refer to the following websites for more information:
10/23/04 19:20:05:   http://wiki.amule.org
10/23/04 19:20:05:   http://www.amule.org
10/23/04 19:20:05: WARNING!
10/23/04 19:20:05: 0 servers in server.met found
10/23/04 19:20:05: No part files found
10/23/04 19:20:05: Found 0 known shared files
10/23/04 19:20:05: Connecting
10/23/04 19:20:05: No valid servers to connect in serverlist found
10/23/04 19:20:05: Disconnected
10/23/04 19:20:10: Creditfile loaded, 0 clients are known
10/23/04 19:20:10: Loaded ipfilter with 0 new IP addresses.

-> "This is known to cause problems..." ... hmm ... should we wait for next wxGTK?

-> "0 servers in server.met found" ... in fact, there is no server.met in the pkg ... can someone explain what this file is and where to get it? it seems to be a configuration file, but it seems that it is not provided with the sources

i added extra/network/amule/PKGBUILD to ABS, but the pkg will be available in extra, when we solved the points above

celeron2002 · 2004-10-23 17:59:31

i have been testing amule, and the only problem is his high consume of memory, but this problem happen after many hours ...
however, IMHO, i think the amule rc is stable enought..

Mr Green · 2004-10-23 18:25:29

http://bbs.archlinux.org/viewtopic.php? … ht=azureus

nice

freakyc · 2004-10-23 20:15:23

About the server.met file, it comes blank as default. You just have to update it when you first run it. The http address at the top is where it updates from.

dp · 2004-10-23 21:55:15

celeron2002 wrote:

i have been testing amule, and the only problem is his high consume of memory, but this problem happen after many hours ...
however, IMHO, i think the amule rc is stable enought..

ok, then (i have no experience with it and will also not be able to run it for hours, because of the bad connection)

dp · 2004-10-23 21:56:53

freakyc wrote:

About the server.met file, it comes blank as default. You just have to update it when you first run it. The http address at the top is where it updates from.

good to know - so this message is not a trouble but normal behaviour on first run? good - i'll check the bins on deps when i come to my laptop and then (if anything ok) put it to extra - thanx for explaination

Mith · 2004-10-24 08:39:40

one question?
why compile azureus *g* seriously you can download the package, unpack it and run azureus.. no nothing and it works
so a package build would download the actual package, unpack it, maybe make a symlink to /usr/bin whereever and that's it.. 8)

dp · 2004-10-24 10:43:46

Mith wrote:

one question?
why compile azureus *g* seriously you can download the package, unpack it and run azureus.. no nothing and it works
so a package build would download the actual package, unpack it, maybe make a symlink to /usr/bin whereever and that's it.. 8)

why compile anything? somewhere, there are for sure some bins to copy around *g*

the main reason is, to make it work better on the installation it should work ... to use the correct version usw.

for java, this is often not needed, but it doesn't hurt either and is better than just copying some .class files in the PKGBUILD instead of compiling it, as this way, you make sure, the sources were compilable on the java version run by archlinux and also will run on this version without trouble

btw: amule is going to extra

punkrockguy318 · 2004-10-24 10:52:20

Bah, dp you need to change your icon back... I can never recognize you anymore

dp · 2004-10-24 11:29:09

punkrockguy318 wrote:

Bah, dp you need to change your icon back... I can never recognize you anymore

back? to the past? i'm one that looks more to the present instead of the past and future ;-)

i for sure will change it, as soon as i take a more usable photo for an avatar

Mith · 2004-10-24 17:18:09

dp wrote:

why compile anything? somewhere, there are for sure some bins to copy around *g*
the main reason is, to make it work better on the installation it should work ... to use the correct version usw.
for java, this is often not needed, but it doesn't hurt either and is better than just copying some .class files in the PKGBUILD instead of compiling it, as this way, you make sure, the sources were compilable on the java version run by archlinux and also will run on this version without trouble
btw: amule is going to extra

hi,
I didn't mean compiling in general was bad, just for this specific case I thought it wouldn't help :evil: :arrow: :twisted:
However, I guess the java check that happens is good since I remember having trouble with jre1.5 and some path not being found and that took a moment and some talking to be fixed

Arch Linux

#1 2004-10-23 15:34:08

about clients p2p...

#2 2004-10-23 16:41:57

Re: about clients p2p...

#3 2004-10-23 17:24:26

Re: about clients p2p...

#4 2004-10-23 17:59:31

Re: about clients p2p...

#5 2004-10-23 18:25:29

Re: about clients p2p...

#6 2004-10-23 20:15:23

Re: about clients p2p...

#7 2004-10-23 21:55:15

Re: about clients p2p...

#8 2004-10-23 21:56:53

Re: about clients p2p...

#9 2004-10-24 08:39:40

Re: about clients p2p...

#10 2004-10-24 10:43:46

Re: about clients p2p...

#11 2004-10-24 10:52:20

Re: about clients p2p...

#12 2004-10-24 11:29:09

Re: about clients p2p...

#13 2004-10-24 17:18:09

Re: about clients p2p...

Board footer