You are not logged in.
Pages: 1
Seems I always have silly questions ( I hope they don't annoy to many people ).
When a package is updated because a newer stable version is released, and other packages have the updated package as a dependency, should the other packages be flagged as out of date because they are not built against the new packages. (can i say packages any more times?)
Example:
libarchive 2.6.2-1 was just updated.
I see that gvfs 1.0.3-2 depends on this package.
Does this mean that gvfs 1.0.3-2 is now out of date and be flagged as such?
Thanks for your time ![]()
Offline
no, it's not out of date. if it has to be rebuild than developers will do it and bump the package version only.
Offline
I guess.
Thanks for the quick response.
Offline
If you care to dive a bit into it, subscribe to the arch-dev mailing list. The system they use for upgrades and publishing packages is all very public.
archlinux - please read this and this — twice — then ask questions.
--
http://rsontech.net | http://github.com/rson
Offline
noted, and subscribed
Offline
Pages: 1