[Solved]Should I add D-Bus to my daemons in rc.conf?

Primoz · 2009-03-31 15:02:02

I searched the wiki (I really did) and found nothing. D-Bus is currently running, but should I add it to my list of daemons that start with boot?
I use KDE mainly which uses D-Bus so it does make sense to me.
I'm just not sure how much of improvement would it be compared to now where D-Bus is started when needed.
I would background it with @dbus so I guess I wouldn't loose that much on boot speed.
So what do you think. Is it "worth it" will it change anything at all?

Last edited by Primoz (2009-03-31 15:38:40)

patroclo7 · 2009-03-31 15:04:27

I do not think that it is called "when needed". Perhaps you have already hal in the DAEMONS array? In that case dbus is actually started too and there is no point in adding it to the array.

s3kt0r · 2009-03-31 15:07:57

Hi.

I don't have Dbus running in my Daemon section, as I run Hal. Hal runs dbus when it starts.

If you have Hal in Daemons, no need for dbus.

Hope that helps.

p.s.: Basicaly another user beat me to the awnser.

Last edited by s3kt0r (2009-03-31 15:09:28)

Primoz · 2009-03-31 15:38:19

Oh I didn't knew that HAL and D-bus are linked. OK then It's clear I don't need to as I have hal already in the daemon array.

Arch Linux

#1 2009-03-31 15:02:02

[Solved]Should I add D-Bus to my daemons in rc.conf?

#2 2009-03-31 15:04:27

Re: [Solved]Should I add D-Bus to my daemons in rc.conf?

#3 2009-03-31 15:07:57

Re: [Solved]Should I add D-Bus to my daemons in rc.conf?

#4 2009-03-31 15:38:19

Re: [Solved]Should I add D-Bus to my daemons in rc.conf?

Board footer