You are not logged in.
Pages: 1
I solved this by deleting the "default face" that I had set in "Login Manager" "users" tab.
[root@night paul]# pacman -Syu
:: Synchronizing package databases...
current [################] 100% 43K 24.3K/s 00:00:01
extra [################] 100% 173K 41.6K/s 00:00:04
Targets: kdebase-3.3.1-2 kdelibs-3.3.1-2 samba-3.0.8-1 shadow-4.0.6-1
Total Package Size: 72.6 MB
Proceed with upgrade? [Y/n] y
:: Retrieving packages from extra...
kdebase-3.3.1-2 [################] 100% 27039K 55.7K/s 00:03:49
kdelibs-3.3.1-2 [################] 100% 31425K 55.7K/s 00:00:52
:: Retrieving packages from current...
samba-3.0.8-1 [################] 100% 14876K 56.3K/s 00:00:08
shadow-4.0.6-1 [################] 100% 941K 54.2K/s 00:00:17
checking package integrity... done.
loading package data... done.
checking for file conflicts...
error: the following file conflicts were found:
kdebase: /opt/kde/share/apps/kdm/faces/.default.face.icon: exists in filesystem
Offline
I get 2 errors (yours + an extra):
# pacman -Syu
:: Synchronizing package databases...
current [################] 100% 43K 20.7K/s 00:00:02
extra [################] 100% 173K 65.6K/s 00:00:02
Targets: devfsd-1.3.25-4 elinks-0.9.2-1 kdebase-3.3.1-2 kdelibs-3.3.1-2
kmplayer-0.8.3a-2 mdadm-1.8.1-1 samba-3.0.8-1 shadow-4.0.6-1
sudo-1.6.8-2
Total Package Size: 74.2 MB
Proceed with upgrade? [Y/n] y
:: Retrieving packages from current...
devfsd-1.3.25-4 [################] 100% 26K 17.3K/s 00:00:01
mdadm-1.8.1-1 [################] 100% 61K 25.3K/s 00:00:02
samba-3.0.8-1 [################] 100% 14876K 29.6K/s 00:04:06
shadow-4.0.6-1 [################] 100% 941K 29.7K/s 00:00:31
sudo-1.6.8-2 [################] 100% 102K 25.5K/s 00:00:04
:: Retrieving packages from extra...
elinks-0.9.2-1 [################] 100% 814K 30.4K/s 00:00:26
kdebase-3.3.1-2 [################] 100% 27039K 29.3K/s 00:02:34
kdelibs-3.3.1-2 [################] 100% 31425K 29.2K/s 00:00:53
kmplayer-0.8.3a-2 [################] 100% 518K 29.7K/s 00:00:17
checking package integrity... done.
loading package data... done.
checking for file conflicts...
error: the following file conflicts were found:
opt/kde/share/mimelnk/audio/x-ms-wma.desktop: exists in "kdelibs" (target) and "kmplayer" (target)
kdebase: /opt/kde/share/apps/kdm/faces/.default.face.icon: exists in filesystem
errors occurred, no packages were upgraded.
kmplayer is probably easier to fix... IMO... if this is the right choice.
It's pretty weird though... how KDM stores the settings in the programs dir, instead of some /etc/ subdir or something.
:: / my web presence
Offline
u can also fix this by adding force to the upgrade
pacman -fSuy
I recognize that while theory and practice are, in theory, the same, they are, in practice, different. -Mark Mitchell
Offline
u can also fix this by adding force to the upgrade
pacman -fSuy
Yea, any time I get a "[file] already exists in system." message I just do -f and force it to write over the existing file. :oops:
Offline
I use -f every time something like this happens (I'm a 9months ArchLinux user btw)... but this time I've encountered this somehow "special" error...
opt/kde/share/mimelnk/audio/x-ms-wma.desktop: exists in "kdelibs" (target) and "kmplayer" (target)
...and I've told myself the following things:
1. well.. that's new: 2 packages that need to get installed conflicting with eachother before they're actually installed
2. eh.. this will be easily fixed by forcing the install of one of them... (I can force in a with a "-Suf", but I preffer manually forcing with "-Sf")
3. ok.. so we have to force an install... but.. which one would it be: kdebase or kmplayer?
4. what if I -Sf kdelibs.. and -Sf kmplayer afterwads? won't file X think it belongs to kmplayer afterwards? what would pacman -Qo say...
5. if I do as I thought before, what if somebody decides to fix kmplayer by removing file X from it... and I upgrade with that new package. Wouldn't file X dissapear from my system, because, as I did the forcing the first time, X belongs to kmplayer now (or not?)... how should I know that I should reinstall kdelibs?
6. what if I do the other way (kdelibs instead of kmplayer)... and it happens the same...
Now, what do you think about that?!?...
... until you find out an answer, I have decided to force the upgrade of kdelibs (just in case) in the future...
:: / my web presence
Offline
Pages: 1