You are not logged in.
Pages: 1
http://frankscorner.org/index.php?p=cpuz
I had a go but I just got a blank window ;-(
would be handy, or would I be better using hardinfo?
Mr Green I like Landuke!
Offline
Try this version: http://www.afterdawn.com/software/deskt … .cfm/v1_39
works for me.
Everyone is born right handed, only the gifted overcome it.
I Never Find Perfection
Offline
Why is it worth trying to get a Windows only app running to do this? I'm not sure that I would trust the results.
Offline
@ iBertus no I did not want to use window app and yes I would not trust the result... needed a little more info on system more than cpuinfo could provide
Its the overclocker in me! :-)
Mr Green I like Landuke!
Offline
I wonder why no decent app like CPU-Z exists for linux? I suppose it's simply because nobody has written it. :-/
Offline
well ... this is it I mean basic stuff is not a problem temps cpu speed etc... but motherboard bios ram settings nothing
tried 1.39 under latest wine get junk junk in a term ;-(
Did google last night but nothing really came out of it most ask the same question is there a cpuz for linux
Emmm will look at cpuz website
Thanks guys
Mr Green I like Landuke!
Offline
cpu information: cat /proc/cpuinfo
Last edited by lloeki (2008-01-27 15:56:33)
To know recursion, you must first know recursion.
Offline
sweet thanks....
Mr Green I like Landuke!
Offline
many informations can also be found with lshal. easily borwsed with a gui like extra/gnome-device-manager (don't forget to display advanced properties to see the full information)
also 'dmesg | less' giving the kernel messages since current bootup may give additional informations
I agree that some piece of software giving a nice, dumpable, unified summary like cpuz does could be nice sometimes, but the use I have of it is too seldom to warrant coding anything.
Last edited by lloeki (2008-01-27 15:59:02)
To know recursion, you must first know recursion.
Offline
You could take a look at this.
http://www.overclock.net/3369458-post199.html
Registered Linux user: #424635
Offline
You could take a look at this.
http://www.overclock.net/3369458-post199.html
Have done a PKGBUILD for this:
http://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=26015
The time when Microsoft starts making something that doesn't suck will be when they start making vacuum cleaners.
Offline
FYI: your pkgbuild made /usr/bin/perlmon a symlink to [build_directory]/perlmon/pkg/usr/share/perlmon/perlmon and i happen to delete my [build_directory] after i've built/installed a package. i'm not familiar enough with PKGBUILDs (yet) to offer a fix but i don't think this is desired behavior
edit: i fixed it with these post install commands
# rm /usr/bin/perlmon
# ln -s /usr/share/perlmon/perlmon /usr/bin/perlmon
dunno why the PKGBUILD is quirky like that
Last edited by brisbin33 (2009-04-28 19:35:01)
//github/
Offline
FYI: your pkgbuild made /usr/bin/perlmon a symlink to [build_directory]/perlmon/pkg/usr/share/perlmon/perlmon and i happen to delete my [build_directory] after i've built/installed a package. i'm not familiar enough with PKGBUILDs (yet) to offer a fix but i don't think this is desired behavior
In fact, all the stuff in build() does (or should) just the same as the "Installer" perl script in the sources, adopted for a fakeroot build/install with makepkg.
The symlink assures that the program can be run by a bare "perlmon" console command instead of providing the whole path "/usr/share/perlmon/perlmon"
Last edited by schmoemi (2009-04-28 19:57:42)
The time when Microsoft starts making something that doesn't suck will be when they start making vacuum cleaners.
Offline
FYI: your pkgbuild made /usr/bin/perlmon a symlink to [build_directory]/perlmon/pkg/usr/share/perlmon/perlmon and i happen to delete my [build_directory] after i've built/installed a package. i'm not familiar enough with PKGBUILDs (yet) to offer a fix but i don't think this is desired behavior
edit: i fixed it with these post install commands
# rm /usr/bin/perlmon # ln -s /usr/share/perlmon/perlmon /usr/bin/perlmon
dunno why the PKGBUILD is quirky like that
I couldn't edit the PKGBUILD-I was told permission denied:
Edit ./PKGBUILD with:
/usr/bin/yaourt: line 67: ./PKGBUILD: Permission denied
No matter, I got it to compile and install. It would seem that either my setup on my CPU is giving PerlMon a headache, or it is not up to date, or it is reporting incorrect data on my CPU.
##############################################################################
CPU Info
##############################################################################
CPU Vendor: AuthenticAMD
CPU Model: AMD Phenom(tm) II X4 20 Processor
CPU Arch: x86_64
CPU Family: 16
CPU Model : 4
CPU Stepping: 2
Instructions : mmx, sse, sse2, 3dnow
CPU speed: 3654.107
CPU L1: 64K + 64K
CPU L2: 512 KB
Note the cache data-which is wrong. I am running a PenomII 720 3 core AM3 socket...but I have unlocked the 4th core on this CPU--CPU-Z reports the same CPU Model, but all the data out of CPUZ is correct regarding cache....here that data is wrong.
See THIS page for correct cache:
http://www.tomshardware.com/gallery/asr … -jpg-.html
Neat program though.
Last edited by Skripka (2009-04-28 19:56:49)
Offline
############################################################################## CPU Info ############################################################################## CPU Vendor: AuthenticAMD CPU Model: AMD Phenom(tm) II X4 20 Processor CPU Arch: x86_64 CPU Family: 16 CPU Model : 4 CPU Stepping: 2 Instructions : mmx, sse, sse2, 3dnow CPU speed: 3654.107 CPU L1: 64K + 64K CPU L2: 512 KB
Note the cache data-which is wrong. I am running a PenomII 720 3 core AM3 socket...but I have unlocked the 4th core on this CPU--CPU-Z reports the same CPU Model, but all the data out of CPUZ is correct regarding cache....here that data is wrong.
See THIS page for correct cache:
http://www.tomshardware.com/gallery/asr … -jpg-.html
Neat program though.
I wouldn't say the cache data is wrong.... it's 100% correct but refers to only one CPU-Core
OK L3-cache is missing completely and instructions are.. erm... incomplete..
Last edited by schmoemi (2009-04-28 20:03:29)
The time when Microsoft starts making something that doesn't suck will be when they start making vacuum cleaners.
Offline
The symlink assures that the program can be run by a bare "perlmon" console command instead of providing the whole path "/usr/share/perlmon/perlmon"
that makes total sense... except... after installing the package, /usr/bin/perlmon was a symlink to /home/patrick/.aurget_dump/perlmon/pkg/usr/share/perlmon/perlmon which can't be right.
my rm and ln commands fix this, but i still don't know why it happens in the first place, maybe just my system; oh well
Last edited by brisbin33 (2009-04-28 20:06:28)
//github/
Offline
brisbin33 wrote:FYI: your pkgbuild made /usr/bin/perlmon a symlink to [build_directory]/perlmon/pkg/usr/share/perlmon/perlmon and i happen to delete my [build_directory] after i've built/installed a package. i'm not familiar enough with PKGBUILDs (yet) to offer a fix but i don't think this is desired behavior
edit: i fixed it with these post install commands
# rm /usr/bin/perlmon # ln -s /usr/share/perlmon/perlmon /usr/bin/perlmon
dunno why the PKGBUILD is quirky like that
I couldn't edit the PKGBUILD-I was told permission denied:
those commands are meant to be run after installation. do
ls -l /usr/bin/perlmon
and see where it points
if it points to /usr/share/perlmon/perlmon then you're fine; if not then you had the same result i did and should run my commands. the program will work fine as long as yoaurt doesn't clear it's build directory thereby leaving the faulty symlink functional.
//github/
Offline
a bit old but did you guys tried lshw?
lshw -html
Give what you have. To someone, it may be better than you dare to think.
Offline
that makes total sense... except... after installing the package, /usr/bin/perlmon was a symlink to /home/patrick/.aurget_dump/perlmon/pkg/usr/share/perlmon/perlmon which can't be right.
my rm and ln commands fix this, but i still don't know why it happens in the first place, maybe just my system; oh well
Alright, now i got the point!
I've to look it up on my machine, I think it has to do with the fakeroot build environment, where "/" is in fact "$startdir/pkg".
Perhaps it's a better approach to create symlinks in the post.install script.. hum..
Any of those PKGBUILD-wizards out there?
The time when Microsoft starts making something that doesn't suck will be when they start making vacuum cleaners.
Offline
a bit old but did you guys tried lshw?
lshw -html
$ lshw -html
bash: lshw: command not found
The time when Microsoft starts making something that doesn't suck will be when they start making vacuum cleaners.
Offline
@schmemi just install it. is in community
pacman -S lshw
Give what you have. To someone, it may be better than you dare to think.
Offline
Pages: 1