You are not logged in.
1) Why doesn't pacman -Quq just keep quite and print a list of packages ?
2) Is it because of any technical limitation or just because nobody has felt the need?
3) Will a patch for that be accepted?
4) How complex will the change be for somebody new to pacman code ?
5) Is there any other method to get a list of upgradable packages without ugly output parsing
More questions pending in queue.
PS: Suggestions to send this to pacman-dev will be redirected to /dev/null .
Offline
Got Leenucks? :: Arch: Power in simplicity :: Get Counted! Registered Linux User #392717 :: Blog thingy
Offline
from pacman man-page
-q, --quiet
Show less information for certain query operations. Search will
only show package names and not version, group, and description
information; a bare query will only show package names rather than
names and versions.
Offline
from pacman man-page
-q, --quiet
Show less information for certain query operations. Search will
only show package names and not version, group, and description
information; a bare query will only show package names rather than
names and versions.
How is that relevent to what i asked?
Offline
5) Yeah, vote for this: http://bugs.archlinux.org/task/14208
In the meantime you can also take a look at my bash-xyne-common_functions and perl-xyne-arch packages. Both of those contain functions for getting a clean upgrade list using bash and perl, resp. Both can handle i18n versions of pacman.
Last edited by Xyne (2009-05-09 18:57:04)
My Arch Linux Stuff • Forum Etiquette • Community Ethos - Arch is not for everyone
Offline
Seems like this is fixed in git...But i dont see any commit messages regarding this....
1 post ,5 comments and 30 minutes of my life wasted.
Offline