You are not logged in.
Pages: 1
I was walking through Barnes and Noble yesterday and I saw this issue of Linux Format. It's a bit hard to see, but the arch logo is actually on the cover there near the end of the spiral-o-distros. I didn't actually buy the magazine (since they cost an arm and a leg), but it was cool to see that arch made it to the cover. Anybody know what they had to say about arch?
Offline
The entire article was reprinted in tech radar: http://www.techradar.com/news/software/ … ?artc_pg=1
Cthulhu For President!
Offline
Best for the sysadmin - Arch Linux
In the 21st century, there can't be many Linux distributions left that drop the user into a command line prompt rather than a Gnome or KDE graphical login screen. But this is the approach taken by Arch Linux, a distribution that's unashamedly built for reconfigurability and gaining geek credentials.
Arch Linux: Yep, there really is nothing to see. The whole point of Arch is that you only add what you need, and many sysadmins only need the command line
It's a distro for experienced Linux users who aren't afraid of getting their hands dirty. That's because you're not going to get a workable configuration out of Arch without editing configuration files and adding the packages you need by hand.
This is a good thing, especially for system administrators, as it means that Arch features none of the distractions you'd find on a standard distribution. But that doesn't mean you're stuck with the command line either.
Thanks to an exceptional package repository, you can quickly build exactly the system you need – even if that means installing KDE 4.2. Arch doesn't make any assumptions about what packages you might want to install.
Logging into live CD-based system, you're invited to run the install script from a specific directory, and installing Arch is like stepping back into 1999. It feels a little like playing an interactive adventure game, and you need to be proficient at both Linux and the command line to make sense of most options.
The base install is a frugal 160MB file that becomes a 390MB installation after you've been through the download and configuration process. An optional FTP based installer is tiny, and offers all the base packages through an FTP server. This is a great option if you need to install Arch on several machines at once, but either way, after installation you're still going to need to construct your own working environment.
That includes manually partitioning your drive and assigning those partitions to points on your filesystem, configuring the network interface and selecting which standard packages to install, as well as editing the Grub boot menu and making sure it's placed on your disk's MBR.
Say no to Windows
The default installation includes no X Window System package, so while the command-line is supremely capable, most users will want to install a graphical environment of some sort. This brings us to the best thing about Arch, and the reason why it's so suitable as an administrators – a tool called Pacman.
Rather than being an insanely addictive gobbling game, Pacman is Arch's package manager, and was developed by the the creator of Arch Linux. Pacman can resolve dependencies automatically, and install packages with a single command. You can install just about anything using just a few key strokes.
X is a single line away, as are both Gnome and KDE, and any number of other window managers, and another command will keep all packages synchronised with those on the server, updating those that are necessary.
From the solid foundation of Arch's base installation, you can build an administrator's toolkit that will only include the applications and the tools for your working environment. This will save system resources on the machine, and your mental resources when you need to get a job done quickly.
Arch includes all the packages you'll ever need, especially when it comes to useful command line tools you'll find more effective at system administration
Arch i686 on Phenom X4 | GTX760
Offline
couldn't people just have read it from the website? why the redundancy? This cries in the face of nerds.
if either the forum or techradar.com dies, we still can read the article! ![]()
raid0 online
☃ Snowman ☃
Offline
a distribution that's unashamedly built for reconfigurability and gaining geek credentials.
That is why I use Ubuntu
Mr Green
Offline
a distribution that's unashamedly built for reconfigurability and gaining geek credentials.
That is why I use Ubuntu
psssssh lil' punk ass biatch all up on ubizzle
best improve yo cli skillz n start reppin a to da r c to the hizzle
GEEK4LIFE
RECONIZE!![]()
My Arch Linux Stuff • Forum Etiquette • Community Ethos - Arch is not for everyone
Offline
Yep, I'm an awesome linux user...
http://glitchtown.com/comics/2009-03-20.png
Offline
Yep, I'm an awesome linux user...
http://glitchtown.com/comics/2009-03-20.png
s/linux/mac/g
My Arch Linux Stuff • Forum Etiquette • Community Ethos - Arch is not for everyone
Offline
couldn't people just have read it from the website? why the redundancy? This cries in the face of nerds.
The original article featured some drivel covering other distros, I simply quoted the most notable section. Feel free to remove my posts though ^_^
Last edited by stefanwilkens (2009-05-11 12:27:26)
Arch i686 on Phenom X4 | GTX760
Offline
Ohoh so does that mean now I can tell people I know what "linux" is?
If so, we shall begin our campaign NOW:

I need real, proper pen and paper for this.
Offline
any particular reason the site uses the Ubuntu screenshot for recommending Ubuntu, then uses it again for recommending Arch?
Offline
Because arch is running in a VM in the screenshot.
archlinux - please read this and this — twice — then ask questions.
--
http://rsontech.net | http://github.com/rson
Offline
So on that cover, which distribution is actually below Arch in the spiral?
Offline
archlinux - please read this and this — twice — then ask questions.
--
http://rsontech.net | http://github.com/rson
Offline
Pages: 1