glibc-2.10.1-2-x86_64 and Segmentation fault

harston · 2009-06-02 14:51:18

After upgrading system and glibc i have problem with subversion:

[2009-06-01 12:03] upgraded glibc (2.9-7 -> 2.10.1-2)
[2009-06-01 12:03] upgraded automake (1.10.2-1 -> 1.11-1)
[2009-06-01 12:03] upgraded binutils (2.19.1-2 -> 2.19.1-3)
[2009-06-01 12:03] upgraded gcc-libs (4.4.0-1 -> 4.4.0-3)
[2009-06-01 12:03] upgraded gcc (4.4.0-1 -> 4.4.0-3)
[2009-06-01 12:03] upgraded glib2 (2.20.1-1 -> 2.20.2-1)
[2009-06-01 12:03] upgraded subversion (1.6.2-2 -> 1.6.2-3)

wen i try to run svn i have SIGSEGV:

getuid() = 0
geteuid() = 0
getgid() = 0
getegid() = 0
open("/usr/lib/sasl2", O_RDONLY|O_NONBLOCK|O_DIRECTORY|O_CLOEXEC) = 3
fcntl(3, F_GETFD) = 0x1 (flags FD_CLOEXEC)
getdents(3, /* 14 entries */, 32768) = 480
open("/usr/lib/sasl2/liblogin.la", O_RDONLY) = 4
fstat(4, {st_mode=S_IFREG|0755, st_size=670, ...}) = 0
mmap(NULL, 4096, PROT_READ|PROT_WRITE, MAP_PRIVATE|MAP_ANONYMOUS, -1, 0) = 0x7f38fc320000
read(4, "# liblogin.la - a libtool library"..., 4096) = 670
close(4) = 0
munmap(0x7f38fc320000, 4096) = 0
futex(0x7f38f70730ec, FUTEX_WAKE_PRIVATE, 2147483647) = 0
open("/usr/lib/sasl2/liblogin.so.2", O_RDONLY) = 4
read(4, "\177ELF\2\1\1\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\3\0>\0\1\0\0\0 \20\0\0\0\0\0\0@"..., 832) = 832
fstat(4, {st_mode=S_IFREG|0444, st_size=20495, ...}) = 0
mmap(NULL, 2112056, PROT_READ|PROT_EXEC, MAP_PRIVATE|MAP_DENYWRITE, 4, 0) = 0x7f38f62bb000
mprotect(0x7f38f62bf000, 2093056, PROT_NONE) = 0
mmap(0x7f38f64be000, 4096, PROT_READ|PROT_WRITE, MAP_PRIVATE|MAP_FIXED|MAP_DENYWRITE, 4, 0x3000) = 0x7f38f64be000
close(4) = 0
--- SIGSEGV (Segmentation fault) @ 0 (0) ---
+++ killed by SIGSEGV +++

I also download subversion and compile it, but problem still exists.
That anyone have same problems after upgrade ? Do you know any solution?

vit · 2009-06-04 16:13:36

I don't know is it the same, but for me some apps (linuxdcpp, goldendict, amarok) die on intensive disk. dmesg:
"goldendict[3266] general protection ip:7f529049de71 sp:7f52861af2e0 error:0 in libc-2.10.1.so[7f529042d000+14a000]"

Arch x86_64 same version of glibc. xfs file system in /home/

SpeedVin · 2009-06-04 18:24:06

I got the same message on startup and tht's is after upgrade gcc and gcc-libs i'm sure becouse i have only that to upgrade.

djgera · 2009-06-04 23:31:35

I can not reproduce it.

what is your locale?

try to run "env -i svn"

A simple "svn" without arguments crash for you?

Can rebuild svn with debugging symbols (-ggdb), then post a backtrace with gdb? And if this information is insuficient, maybe you need to recompile glibc with debug symbols.

Last edited by djgera (2009-06-04 23:33:14)

skottish · 2009-06-04 23:35:08

I'm not seeing this. I'm not sure if it's a factor, but I'm fully up to date with testing.

SpeedVin · 2009-06-05 19:30:18

djgera wrote:

I can not reproduce it.
what is your locale?
try to run "env -i svn"
A simple "svn" without arguments crash for you?
Can rebuild svn with debugging symbols (-ggdb), then post a backtrace with gdb? And if this information is insuficient, maybe you need to recompile glibc with debug symbols.

I don't use svn.
My locales is "pl_PL"

vit · 2009-06-06 06:36:09

svn works, but others are crashing. Locale en_EN UTF-8 and ru_RU UTF-8

djgera · 2009-06-06 06:39:02

@SpeedVin: what you execute that trigger this crash? So I can try here if the crash appears.

SpeedVin · 2009-06-06 07:35:29

vit wrote:

svn works, but others are crashing. Locale en_EN UTF-8 and ru_RU UTF-8

I have too UTF-8 locales.

@SpeedVin: what you execute that trigger this crash? So I can try here if the crash appears.

I have this message on boot up and i don't run any deamons on startup but in my initscripts I have script that load my locales.

djgera · 2009-06-06 19:01:27

@SpeedVin: what is the apps that crash? I running the system in polish (pl_PL and pl_PL.utf8) and no crash. :S

SpeedVin · 2009-06-07 08:51:09

Sytem doesen't crashes he start normal but I see this message.
My apps is working good.

dmartins · 2009-06-08 11:33:28

What kernel version(s) are people experiencing problems using? The news page says 2.6.18 is the new minimum version when using glibc-2.10.

SpeedVin · 2009-06-08 14:09:39

I use 26.29.4 kernel

djgera · 2009-06-09 01:12:02

@dmartins: A system with a older kernel than 2.6.18 will result in: no boot! The first program executed: init that is linked to glibc, will show: "Kernel too old"

@SpeedVin: If you get a general protection / segmentation fault, the you have a crash.
Please provide a backtrace of the application that crash, with what libs are loaded and with debug symbols (recompile without stripping and with cflags with -ggdb)

$ gdb /the/aplication/that/crash
(gdb) r
(gdb) bt
(gdb) info r
(gdb) info sha

With this can have some idea of the issue.

SpeedVin · 2009-06-09 13:12:36

Sorry but i don't know what app crash

Arch Linux

#1 2009-06-02 14:51:18

glibc-2.10.1-2-x86_64 and Segmentation fault

#2 2009-06-04 16:13:36

Re: glibc-2.10.1-2-x86_64 and Segmentation fault

#3 2009-06-04 18:24:06

Re: glibc-2.10.1-2-x86_64 and Segmentation fault

#4 2009-06-04 23:31:35

Re: glibc-2.10.1-2-x86_64 and Segmentation fault

#5 2009-06-04 23:35:08

Re: glibc-2.10.1-2-x86_64 and Segmentation fault

#6 2009-06-05 19:30:18

Re: glibc-2.10.1-2-x86_64 and Segmentation fault

#7 2009-06-06 06:36:09

Re: glibc-2.10.1-2-x86_64 and Segmentation fault

#8 2009-06-06 06:39:02

Re: glibc-2.10.1-2-x86_64 and Segmentation fault

#9 2009-06-06 07:35:29

Re: glibc-2.10.1-2-x86_64 and Segmentation fault

#10 2009-06-06 19:01:27

Re: glibc-2.10.1-2-x86_64 and Segmentation fault

#11 2009-06-07 08:51:09

Re: glibc-2.10.1-2-x86_64 and Segmentation fault

#12 2009-06-08 11:33:28

Re: glibc-2.10.1-2-x86_64 and Segmentation fault

#13 2009-06-08 14:09:39

Re: glibc-2.10.1-2-x86_64 and Segmentation fault

#14 2009-06-09 01:12:02

Re: glibc-2.10.1-2-x86_64 and Segmentation fault

#15 2009-06-09 13:12:36

Re: glibc-2.10.1-2-x86_64 and Segmentation fault

Board footer