You are not logged in.

#1 2009-07-02 20:25:09

cliffbreaker
Member
From: Tiraspol, Transnistria
Registered: 2008-11-23
Posts: 52

firefox 3.5?

Maybe it's a silly question but is firefox 3.5 planned for i686 architecture? now in repos is only 64-bit version for some time and i was surprised to see no i686 version. Thanks.


Windows works in 80 % cases, Linux in 20%, but you can make linux work in other 80% cases whilst you can never make windows work in last 20%

Offline

#2 2009-07-02 20:26:08

arch0r
Member
From: From the Chron-o-John
Registered: 2008-05-13
Posts: 597

Re: firefox 3.5?

no, 64bit only such as arch sad

Offline

#3 2009-07-02 20:58:55

Pierre
Developer
From: Bonn
Registered: 2004-07-05
Posts: 1,964
Website

Re: firefox 3.5?

We are so upset that Mozilla does not support JIT on x86_64 that we dropped the i686 version. 64 Bit ftw!

PS: ;-)

Offline

#4 2009-07-02 21:08:37

wonder
Developer
From: Bucharest, Romania
Registered: 2006-07-05
Posts: 5,941
Website

Re: firefox 3.5?

don't  remember that i686 is deprecated? cool

Last edited by wonder (2009-07-02 21:09:01)


Give what you have. To someone, it may be better than you dare to think.

Offline

#5 2009-07-02 21:17:44

jelly
Administrator
From: /dev/null
Registered: 2008-06-10
Posts: 714

Re: firefox 3.5?

/me thinks the i686 processors are too old to compile that big beast of firefox

Offline

#6 2009-07-02 21:17:46

cliffbreaker
Member
From: Tiraspol, Transnistria
Registered: 2008-11-23
Posts: 52

Re: firefox 3.5?

lol):D so when will it hit the repos?


Windows works in 80 % cases, Linux in 20%, but you can make linux work in other 80% cases whilst you can never make windows work in last 20%

Offline

#7 2009-07-02 21:18:30

Mr.Elendig
#archlinux@freenode channel op
From: The intertubes
Registered: 2004-11-07
Posts: 4,092

Re: firefox 3.5?

You missed the news

Last edited by Mr.Elendig (2009-07-02 21:19:27)


Evil #archlinux@libera.chat channel op and general support dude.
. files on github, Screenshots, Random pics and the rest

Offline

#8 2009-07-02 21:21:16

cliffbreaker
Member
From: Tiraspol, Transnistria
Registered: 2008-11-23
Posts: 52

Re: firefox 3.5?

and btw. if i have dual core inter processor, will 64 bit arch run with no problems?


Windows works in 80 % cases, Linux in 20%, but you can make linux work in other 80% cases whilst you can never make windows work in last 20%

Offline

#9 2009-07-02 21:33:53

eldragon
Member
From: Buenos Aires
Registered: 2008-11-18
Posts: 1,029

Re: firefox 3.5?

cliffbreaker wrote:

and btw. if i have dual core inter processor, will 64 bit arch run with no problems?

32bit per core, so yeah big_smile

now being serious.... i686 is not being dropped. ff3.5 for i686 will be built when the time comes.. heck, ive got 600mb of updates (uncompressed) on hold for other reasons, i guess devs are taking care of that first (which breaks stuff) before updating ff. but thats a wild guess.

Offline

#10 2009-07-02 21:38:40

cliffbreaker
Member
From: Tiraspol, Transnistria
Registered: 2008-11-23
Posts: 52

Re: firefox 3.5?

thanks a lot for the reply


Windows works in 80 % cases, Linux in 20%, but you can make linux work in other 80% cases whilst you can never make windows work in last 20%

Offline

#11 2009-07-02 21:39:50

wonder
Developer
From: Bucharest, Romania
Registered: 2006-07-05
Posts: 5,941
Website

Re: firefox 3.5?

@cliffbreaker i was joking man. don't have to use x86_64.
the best answer that i can give is that nobody compile yet the i686 version.


Give what you have. To someone, it may be better than you dare to think.

Offline

#12 2009-07-03 15:58:28

DevoidOfWindows
Member
Registered: 2009-05-24
Posts: 133

Re: firefox 3.5?

Post deleted.

Last edited by DevoidOfWindows (2009-07-03 16:15:52)

Offline

Board footer

Powered by FluxBB