You are not logged in.
Pages: 1
iam cofused about these projects is arch planning on implementing these?
Acer Aspire V5-573P Antergos KDE
Offline
Last word I had read was that Devkit will come sooner or later...
PackageKit-what would be the point? It doesn't even work that good to start with, last time I tried it.
Offline
will there be a pacman backend for packagekit?
Acer Aspire V5-573P Antergos KDE
Offline
Appears packagekit does have libalpm support: http://www.packagekit.org/pk-matrix.html
Offline
Appears packagekit does have libalpm support: http://www.packagekit.org/pk-matrix.html
So are there arch developers who are working for packagekit? How does it have support for pacman? Are there other packagemanagers using alpm?
what about the grey boxes?
Acer Aspire V5-573P Antergos KDE
Offline
iphitus wrote:Appears packagekit does have libalpm support: http://www.packagekit.org/pk-matrix.html
So are there arch developers who are working for packagekit? How does it have support for pacman? Are there other packagemanagers using alpm?
what about the grey boxes?
Shaman works great, is stable and is in the AUR.
Offline
no I was asking in context of packagekit, I know shaman uses alpm
Acer Aspire V5-573P Antergos KDE
Offline
I've got interested, too. Discovered this by accident :
$ yaourt -Ss packagekit
aur/gnome-packagekit 2.27.2-1 (75)
Collection of graphical tools for PackageKit to be used in the GNOME desktop
aur/gnome-packagekit-git 20090329-1 (6)
Collection of graphical tools for PackageKit to be used in the GNOME desktop
aur/kpackagekit 0.4.1.1-1 (20)
KDE tools for PackageKit
aur/libpackagekit-qt 0.5.0-1 (23)
Qt bindings to work with PackageKit
aur/packagekit 0.5.0-1 (109)
A system designed to make installing and updating software on your computer easier
aur/packagekit-git 20090329-1 (6)
A system designed to make installing and updating software on your computer easier
Judging by the votes, quite some life is happening... Will anybody in the know please tell more about the tool? I mean, what pacman/yaourt/shaman is lacking with respect to the deviceKit?
Offline
iphitus wrote:Appears packagekit does have libalpm support: http://www.packagekit.org/pk-matrix.html
So are there arch developers who are working for packagekit? How does it have support for pacman? Are there other packagemanagers using alpm?
what about the grey boxes?
I'm not an Arch developer, but I'm interested in having PackageKit on my system, so I'm a developer of ALPM backend. For now there are many things to improve, but basic operations (like system update or package installation) do work. As usual, testers welcome. And if there are interested developers, their contributions will be very appreciated.
About the grey boxes - most of these operations are not neccesary to implement. For example, GetDistroUpgrades or InstallSignature were introduced for distros like Fedora or Ubuntu, and are useless in Arch.
Offline
will there be a pacman backend for packagekit?
To my knowledge, frontends adapt to the backend. Not the other way.
Got Leenucks? :: Arch: Power in simplicity :: Get Counted! Registered Linux User #392717 :: Blog thingy
Offline
venky80 wrote:will there be a pacman backend for packagekit?
To my knowledge, frontends adapt to the backend. Not the other way.
PackageKit itself can be considered as frontend, because it uses low-level plugins (backends) to do its work.
Offline
venky80 wrote:will there be a pacman backend for packagekit?
To my knowledge, frontends adapt to the backend. Not the other way.
Well I think what I meant was will I see packagekit working with pacman, I wansnt intending to say that pacman has to "give in" for packagekit!
Acer Aspire V5-573P Antergos KDE
Offline
all these *kits are quite crappy in terms of fulfilling promises, thank God (I hope) this is only voluntary, not obligatory change.
Offline
all these *kits are quite crappy in terms of fulfilling promises, thank God (I hope) this is only voluntary, not obligatory change.
well policykit and consolekit are now totally integrated into kde gnome, so unless you use some other WM/DE you have not choice!
Acer Aspire V5-573P Antergos KDE
Offline
broch wrote:all these *kits are quite crappy in terms of fulfilling promises, thank God (I hope) this is only voluntary, not obligatory change.
well policykit and consolekit are now totally integrated into kde gnome, so unless you use some other WM/DE you have not choice!
to use *kits, you need to configure them (unless as Fedora users who claim that they use selinux, but never bothered to configure it, you think that having stuff installed makes it automatically work), not to mention that this is backward security: first make all daemons to run without root privileges. This would be good start.
If I could I would get rid of kits altogether. Look what hapened to windows access control. It is way more fine grained, gives a lot more options and... because of complexicity nobody uses it, not many even know where to look for.
Offline
all these *kits are quite crappy in terms of fulfilling promises, thank God (I hope) this is only voluntary, not obligatory change.
When you talk about experimental and/or developing project, you can't say that they do not fulfill promises, as there are many things to consider on the way of development, and this can't be done in one day. Look at the NetworkManager - it was indeed crappy, but with every release it was becoming more and more stable and interesting, and now many users (like me ) use it as a primary tool to manage network. Look at dbus, which was accepted by Arch users with much scepticism, and now it is included in core repo. Such projects like PolicyKit/ConsoleKit/PackageKit have great potential and they can be easily integrated in your DE of choice, so why not use it?
Offline
Pages: 1