latexmk is gone?

Barghest · 2009-07-29 15:08:16

Hi,

today I had to realize that latexmk isn't in AUR anymore. Unfortunately I don't have the PKBUILD.

Anyone knows, why it was removed? If anyone has the PKGBUILD for me I maybe can maintain it so that it's available again.

Kind regards

barghest

Last edited by Barghest (2009-08-25 19:08:35)

Stefan Husmann · 2009-07-29 16:17:39

I removed it because it is included in texlive-bin 2009 from testing. The PKGBUILD is

# Contributor: Peter Garceau (rockychimp@gmail.com)
# Maintainer: Stefan Husmann <stefan-husmann@t-online.de>
pkgname=latexmk
pkgver=408
pkgrel=1
arch=('any')
pkgdesc="A perl script with a make-like functionality for latex documents."
url="http://www.phys.psu.edu/~collins/software/latexmk-jcc/versions.html"
license=('GPL2')
depends=('perl' 'texlive-bin')
source=(http://www.phys.psu.edu/~collins/software/latexmk-jcc/$pkgname-$pkgver.zip)
md5sums=('6cd795f0aee1198cdaef26d3be32da92')

build() {
  install -Dm755 latexmk.pl $pkgdir/usr/bin/latexmk || return 1
  install -Dm644 latexmk.1 -p \
    $pkgdir/usr/share/man/man1/latexmk.1 || return 1
  install -d $pkgdir/usr/share/$pkgname || return 1
  echo "\$pscmd = 'ps -aeg';" > \
    $pkgdir/usr/share/$pkgname/LatexMk || return 1
  echo "\$pid_position = 1;" >> \
    $pkgdir/usr/share/$pkgname/LatexMk || return 1
  install -d $pkgdir/usr/share/doc/$pkgname
  for _i in example_rcfiles extra-scripts
  do
    cp -r ${_i} $pkgdir/usr/share/doc/$pkgname
  done || return 1
  rm $pkgdir/usr/share/doc/$pkgname/extra-scripts/*.bat || return 1
}

Barghest · 2009-07-29 17:45:07

Hi Stefan,

thanks for the information.

So, when the new texlive-bin moves to [extra] a separate package will be obsolete?

I think we than can wait until the this move is performed.

Thanks again,

Thomas

Stefan Husmann · 2009-07-29 18:00:41

yes, maybe the removal was a bit early, sorry for that.

Barghest · 2009-07-31 06:26:57

No need for excuse...

....solved

Barghest · 2009-08-25 19:08:25

Hi, could it be possible, that only the i686 version contains latexmk?

At work it is included but here on x86_64 after the update the command latexmk isn't found.

Last edited by Barghest (2009-08-25 19:18:31)

Stefan Husmann · 2009-08-25 20:11:32

oops you are right. It is a bug, I guess.

Stefan Husmann · 2009-08-25 20:19:38

No, it is gone in both arches. Anyway, I reloaded it to AUR, there was a recent upstream update.

Last edited by Stefan Husmann (2009-08-25 20:39:39)

Barghest · 2009-08-26 07:00:12

Strange.

When I updated on the first machine pacman complained about an already existent latexmk in filesystem (I've forgotten the exact path). So I removed latexmk and performed the update after that I still was able to us latexmk - pacman -Qs latexmk gives no result.

At home I removed latexmk before the update but after it latexmk wasn't found anymore and I had to reinstall it - pacman -Qs latexmk shows the installed package.

Thanks for the AUR package though.

Arch Linux

#1 2009-07-29 15:08:16

latexmk is gone?

#2 2009-07-29 16:17:39

Re: latexmk is gone?

#3 2009-07-29 17:45:07

Re: latexmk is gone?

#4 2009-07-29 18:00:41

Re: latexmk is gone?

#5 2009-07-31 06:26:57

Re: latexmk is gone?

#6 2009-08-25 19:08:25

Re: latexmk is gone?

#7 2009-08-25 20:11:32

Re: latexmk is gone?

#8 2009-08-25 20:19:38

Re: latexmk is gone?

#9 2009-08-26 07:00:12

Re: latexmk is gone?

Board footer