You are not logged in.
Pages: 1
I am looking to convert my entire .mp3 collection
over to something more GNU friendly, any suggestions?
Offline
transcoding is a bad idea but i guess it's ogg you're looking for.
Offline
Offline
Hello, fellow KoLer.
Yes, transcoding's a bad idea. Any two lossless format use different algorithms to compress file size, and information invariably gets lost in the process. So, unless you have the original data in a lossless format (e.g. FLAC), you probably shouldn't do it.
<edit>Changed non-compressed to lossless. :-/
Last edited by Runiq (2009-08-29 12:06:57)
Offline
@bangkok_manouel & Ashren - Thanks
@Runiq I see, unfortunately I'm willing to sacrifice the quality, I made a tough choice: Netbook or mp3Player(ipod)
(Netbook) > (iPod)
Most of the mp3s were ripped from cds at 192 so I'm hoping that after the -> Transcoding & Netbook soundcard it will be tolerable.
Any suggested converter tools?
Thanks again
Last edited by action_owl (2009-08-29 09:06:07)
Offline
Still don't understand why you need to convert. Political objections to mp3? Your netbook should be able to play mp3 files as well as ogg.
Offline
Unnecessary degradation of quality in my opinion
The day Microsoft makes a product that doesn't suck, is the day they make a vacuum cleaner.
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
But if they tell you that I've lost my mind, maybe it's not gone just a little hard to find...
Offline
You'll have to weigh the (presumedly) political objections (anyone who mentions GNU-friendly reminds me of Stallman...) against the high probability that your music will sound sucky. Its not a contest, for me, I'm a realist. If you DO feel so strongly about it, then may I suggest FLAC, though that will kill your HD space...
Allan-Volunteer on the (topic being discussed) mailn lists. You never get the people who matters attention on the forums.
jasonwryan-Installing Arch is a measure of your literacy. Maintaining Arch is a measure of your diligence. Contributing to Arch is a measure of your competence.
Griemak-Bleeding edge, not bleeding flat. Edge denotes falls will occur from time to time. Bring your own parachute.
Offline
Any suggested converter tools?
Unnecessary degradation of quality in my opinion
I agree, unless you start from a lossless format as flac.
Offline
If he had FLAC he wouldn't have to convert in the first place .
Seriously - I wouldn't do it. It is technically possible but not recommended at all, as other people said, trading piece of mind for sound quality is a debatable thing imho.
Got Leenucks? :: Arch: Power in simplicity :: Get Counted! Registered Linux User #392717 :: Blog thingy
Offline
Leave them as mp3 if you can. It has the highest compatibility with the greatest number of devices. There's no reason to transcode unless you're going to lossless which is utterly pointless anyway. Making the file size many times larger to have it sound exactly the same is silly.
Changing audio formats because of some ideology is ridiculous. There's no common format that isn't bound legally, including vorbis. It'd be nice if people would stop believing that lie.
Offline
I was just tired of having to install mp3 codecs on any distribution that I use.
I was in hopes that there was something more.."universal" or "GNU-ish"
Perhaps I should just start saving new music to .ogg?
But I like the idea of uniformity, Ill see how degraded they sound and decide.
Offline
If you can re-rip from a lossless source, Ogg does sound better at lower bitrates, which is a far better reason to use it than ideological purity. But I agree with the others: transcoding from MP3 won't give any advantage, and in all probability will actually sound worse.
Perhaps I should just start saving new music to .ogg?
That's what I did, and re-ripped stuff I have on CD. Anything I have only as MP3, I've just left. There's no point.
0 Ok, 0:1
Offline
i heard mpc is the best lossy format
flac the best loseless format
both are free
Offline
You mean Vorbis. Ogg is just a media container.
Offline
i heard mpc is the best lossy format
flac the best loseless format
both are free
Flac is kind of the golden middle road of lossless formats, it's not really spectacular in any way but it compresses quite well and fast. Also it's supported by everything.
MPC is good. It has quite low hardware support though. I would prefer using Nero AAC or AoTuV OGG instead.
Last edited by Zeist (2009-09-01 22:46:44)
I haven't lost my mind; I have a tape back-up somewhere.
Twitter
Offline
Pages: 1