You are not logged in.

#26 2009-08-29 10:47:30

moljac024
Member
From: Serbia
Registered: 2008-01-29
Posts: 2,676

Re: File Managers

I'm also one of the weirdos.
I use bash/coreutilus, mc and thunar/nautilus....depending on the task and/or mood smile


The day Microsoft makes a product that doesn't suck, is the day they make a vacuum cleaner.
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
But if they tell you that I've lost my mind, maybe it's not gone just a little hard to find...

Offline

#27 2009-08-29 13:17:16

Trent
Member
From: Baltimore, MD (US)
Registered: 2009-04-16
Posts: 990

Re: File Managers

archdaemon wrote:

I will admit rox took two tries, though, as it's very strange to use for someone who expects the application to *stay still*. I can't remember why I gave it a second look, but I'm glad I did.

Haha, yes, that took some getting used to.  Now, though, with a tiling window manager, I don't have to worry about it.

Offline

#28 2009-09-01 00:38:28

chilebiker
Member
From: Zurich, Switzerland
Registered: 2006-07-18
Posts: 161

Re: File Managers

I'm a huge fan of emelFM2. It takes quite a while to configure tough, but once you've done it to your liking it's just awesome, especially the keybindings and the plugins...


Don't panic!

Offline

#29 2009-09-01 01:03:44

jcolinzheng
Member
From: Cambridge, MA
Registered: 2008-08-06
Posts: 50
Website

Re: File Managers

droog wrote:
jcolinzheng wrote:

Vifm is neat, but comparison to MC, is too simplistic, doesn't handle (compressed) archive and remote folders, and lacks support for extension.  Still the best file manager is a well configured MC with utf-8 patch.

vifm can handle archives or any filetype any way you want it to, you just have to set it up in the vifmrc.
for example can list contents or extract a tar.gz with.
FILETYPE=Archive=tar.gz,tgz=tar -tzf %f | less,tar -zxvf %f

By "support for archive", I of course mean mounting the archive as a virtual file system.  Not just listing its content.

Offline

#30 2009-09-01 02:43:59

scrawler
Member
Registered: 2005-06-07
Posts: 318

Re: File Managers

I like rox for it's panels and its send-to menu. I wouldn't want to do without it.

...and I said pretty much the same thing in the thread refered to above. :-)  At least I'm consistent.

Last edited by scrawler (2009-09-02 14:13:29)

Offline

#31 2009-09-01 11:38:17

SpeedVin
Member
From: Poland
Registered: 2009-04-29
Posts: 955

Re: File Managers

From now I use dmenfm as my main fm iwth bash and coreutils utilities smile
Dmenfm is so simple , you must try it smile


Shell Scripter | C/C++/Python/Java Coder | ZSH

Offline

#32 2009-09-02 05:31:44

doorknob60
Member
Registered: 2008-09-29
Posts: 403

Re: File Managers

PCmanFM is amazing, although in KDE (which I'm using right now) Dolphin is the best choice.

Offline

#33 2009-09-02 07:02:55

rwd
Member
Registered: 2009-02-08
Posts: 664

Re: File Managers

The feature i like about Thunar and which is missing in PCmanfm afaik is 'custom actions' to call  shellscripts from the context menu.

Last edited by rwd (2009-09-02 07:09:09)

Offline

Board footer

Powered by FluxBB