[SOLVED] status of bugs.archlinux.org

sand_man · 2009-09-01 02:20:02

lseubert wrote:

cactus wrote:
yo dawg, I heard you like bugtrackers, so we put a bugtracker in your bugs so you can track bugs while you bugtrack.
How many bugs would a bugtracker track if a bugtracker would track bugs?

An SQL query could tell you the answer to that

skottish · 2009-09-01 02:25:57

sand_man wrote:

lseubert wrote:
cactus wrote:
yo dawg, I heard you like bugtrackers, so we put a bugtracker in your bugs so you can track bugs while you bugtrack.
How many bugs would a bugtracker track if a bugtracker would track bugs?
An SQL query could tell you the answer to that

Haskell can do it in two lines. Unfortunately, the indentation is so complex that no one ever uses it.

sand_man · 2009-09-01 03:01:34

skottish wrote:

sand_man wrote:
lseubert wrote:
How many bugs would a bugtracker track if a bugtracker would track bugs?
An SQL query could tell you the answer to that
Haskell can do it in two lines. Unfortunately, the indentation is so complex that no one ever uses it.

Hah! I know you're not joking but it's still funny.

the_glu · 2009-09-04 23:01:19

The bug tracker is up again, do the problem with flyspray was fixed ? How ?

djszapi · 2009-09-05 06:29:27

Yeah, the http://bugs.archlinux.org got back, thanks developers )

lefallen · 2009-09-16 22:22:04

So what was the issue? Was it with an Arch specific modification or with FlySpray itself. If the later, is it with version 0.9.9.5.1 of FlySpray or the latest and what was the fix?

I ask as I'm now scared to expose my FlySpray instance

Arch Linux

#26 2009-09-01 02:20:02

Re: [SOLVED] status of bugs.archlinux.org

#27 2009-09-01 02:25:57

Re: [SOLVED] status of bugs.archlinux.org

#28 2009-09-01 03:01:34

Re: [SOLVED] status of bugs.archlinux.org

#29 2009-09-04 23:01:19

Re: [SOLVED] status of bugs.archlinux.org

#30 2009-09-05 06:29:27

Re: [SOLVED] status of bugs.archlinux.org

#31 2009-09-16 22:22:04

Re: [SOLVED] status of bugs.archlinux.org

Board footer