You are not logged in.
Pages: 1
Do you have some tips and tricks to improve performance of your system ? Than share them with everyone else!
I'll start:
Use deadline I/O scheduler:
echo deadline > /sys/block/hda/queue/scheduler
I had the problem that pacman was really slow. Installing/querying/updating... a package took up to 5 minutes. During that time the rest of the system was noticeably slower. Using deadline really helped. Could have something to do with my filesystem ext3. Here and here are a few more infos about it.
Offline
You could have /var on another partition. Like I do. I user reiserfs for /var. Noticeably faster pacman. Next, my /tmp is in ram. You have both tutorials in wiki.
Offline
I've had better luck with the cfq scheduler than deadline.
Add "elevator=cfq" to your GRUB kernel line.
Offline
vm.swappiness=1
vm.vfs_cache_pressure=10
in /etc/sysctl.conf
old, popular trick- but it seems to work for me (or is it just placebo?)
Offline
1. Use x64
2. I remember this gave me a nice X performance boots, kept it in Screen section ever since:
Option "MigrationHeuristic" "greedy"
3. Always disable all animations in gnome configuration editor
4. Keep in DAEMONS line only what is necessary
Offline
I've had better luck with the cfq scheduler than deadline.
Add "elevator=cfq" to your GRUB kernel line.
Isn't cfq the default scheduler?
(lambda ())
Offline
1. Use BFS scheduler. [fixed]
2. Use ext4
3. Use x86_64.
--------
(Hardware)
4. Buy an Intel SSD.
Last edited by flamelab (2009-09-19 22:45:10)
Offline
Barrucadu wrote:I've had better luck with the cfq scheduler than deadline.
Add "elevator=cfq" to your GRUB kernel line.
Isn't cfq the default scheduler?
Yes it is
I've seen somewhere (can't remember where) that the deadline scheduler may be a bit better for people with sata hard disks with ncq.
Reason: having ncq and the cfq scheduler trying to reorder requests to optimize performance may not be the best option, makes some sense but I don't know about actual performance, I have used cfq, deadline and now using noop and although things seems to improve a little with deadline/noop it may very well be just placebo effect
R00KIE
Tm90aGluZyB0byBzZWUgaGVyZSwgbW92ZSBhbG9uZy4K
Offline
1. Use BFS
2. Use ext4
3. Use x86_64.--------
(Hardware)
4. Buy an Intel SSD.
Why BFS? (Curious)
Offline
flamelab wrote:1. Use BFS
2. Use ext4
3. Use x86_64.--------
(Hardware)
4. Buy an Intel SSD.
Why BFS? (Curious)
Check here http://bbs.archlinux.org/viewtopic.php?id=79398 I mean the scheduler, not the filesystem.
Offline
Pages: 1