You are not logged in.

#51 2009-09-23 12:53:02

mirhciulica
Member
From: Romania
Registered: 2009-09-23
Posts: 13

Re: gnome unstable repository

combuster wrote:

Does anybody suffers from compiz issue (agressive cpu usage).

Yes, I do suffer. It's a known bug https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+sour … bug/389686. Compiz fails to kill metacity.
Try killing metacity wink

Offline

#52 2009-09-23 13:51:02

combuster
Member
From: Serbia
Registered: 2008-09-30
Posts: 711
Website

Re: gnome unstable repository

Thnx man, I thought that gnome-session caused this but it's metacity after all, thnx smile

killall metacity fixes the issue, muchos gracias amigo big_smile

Offline

#53 2009-09-23 23:50:40

nfm
Member
Registered: 2008-06-13
Posts: 62

Re: gnome unstable repository

Thanks for the packages, I'm using x86_64 and noticed few things:

- It takes some time to logout, I don't see any abnormal errors or warnings
- 'Startup Applications' fails to add any startup programs
- Nautilus doesn't detect any of my partitions, instead it shows fd0 even though I have disabled the floppy controller along with 1.44MB boot device
- When sound theme is enabled, in case of any event  when a sound plays, at the end of each there's a loud crack/pop which is very bad for my amp.

Last edited by nfm (2009-09-24 00:00:43)

Offline

#54 2009-09-24 00:10:53

combuster
Member
From: Serbia
Registered: 2008-09-30
Posts: 711
Website

Re: gnome unstable repository

1. I agree, but I've seen some error messages like:

(firefox:2939): Gdk-WARNING **: XID collision, trouble ahead
(gnome-terminal:5075): Gdk-CRITICAL **: gdk_x11_atom_to_xatom_for_display: assertion `atom != GDK_NONE' failed
Hidden jd.gui.swing.jdgui.views.info.DownloadInfoPanel[,0,0,786x53,layout=net.miginfocom.swing.MigLayout,alignmentX=0.0,alignmentY=0.0,border=jd.gui.swing.jdgui.borders.InsideShadowBorder@a5c18ff,flags=16777217,maximumSize=,minimumSize=,preferredSize=]
Shutting down nautilus-sound-converter extension
Shutting down nautilus-image-converter extension

--- Hash table keys for warning below:
--> x-nautilus-desktop:///
--> file:///home/combuster
--> file:///home/combuster/Desktop

(nautilus:2050): Eel-WARNING **: "nautilus-metafile.c: metafiles" hash table still has 3 elements at quit time (keys above)

(nautilus:2050): Eel-WARNING **: "nautilus-directory.c: directories" hash table still has 3 elements at quit time

2. Startup apps are bringing up fusion-icon and conky quite nicelly smile So no problems for me here

3. It's weird about nautilus, I can't eject a blank dvd and every time upon closing a dvd session it brings up can not mount media and burning gets through but half of data is unreadable on dvd... Devicekit related thingy?

4. I don't keep sound themes enabled... When I enabled it just to test no poping sounds occurs...

Offline

#55 2009-09-24 01:04:53

nfm
Member
Registered: 2008-06-13
Posts: 62

Re: gnome unstable repository

Hey thanks for the feedback,
The startup entries seem to work now, I had to specify absolute file paths, e.g. '/usr/bin/xfwm4' instead of 'xfwm4'. I'm getting bombarded with:

Window manager warning: Failed to read saved session file /home/nfm/.config/metacity/sessions/103e091ee49230cb54125376105910507300000029650017.ms:

...Too much output, ignoring rest...

This message is so old and annoying that it is ridiculous that it wasn't fixed yet. Also gnome-terminal fails on me occasionally:

Vte:ERROR:vtestream-file.h:30:_xread: assertion failed: (fd || !len)

Last edited by nfm (2009-09-24 01:19:26)

Offline

#56 2009-09-24 02:46:01

Thek586
Member
From: Fr
Registered: 2009-07-30
Posts: 10

Re: gnome unstable repository

Hum, now i have a little bug in the notification area of the panel:
hum.png
Normally its fully transparent, but now (only on some icons), i have this grey background.

Last edited by Thek586 (2009-09-24 02:46:21)

Offline

#57 2009-09-24 05:30:30

Maledictvm
Member
Registered: 2009-02-02
Posts: 14

Re: gnome unstable repository

Thanks for the packaging. It's working great here on x86_64. My only problem is that I can't entirely disable the icons in the gnome-panel (not those in notification area, of course) and the Gnome Menu Bar has a fixed size of 25-26 pixels which stretches my panel to an unwanted size. I used 21 pixels per Panel for years and I can barely stand the huge panel right now.

Any idea on how to disable the icons in the menus of the Panel? Any idea if I can force Gtk via theming to *not* bringt bloat to my panel? It has to be related to the "no icons on buttons"-decision Gnome has made for 2.28. I had these icons disabled anyway.

Here's a small screenshot. The orange line is part of my wallpaper. http://img5.imagebanana.com/img/whgra8a … nshot1.png

Offline

#58 2009-09-24 06:58:59

combuster
Member
From: Serbia
Registered: 2008-09-30
Posts: 711
Website

Re: gnome unstable repository

@nfm

Yeah, I get these messages about .config/metacity regulary...

@Thek586

I had these problems with gnome 2.26 also, but now in 2.28 it's getting worse, sometimes entire notification area in panel is gray, I can't even see the icons (although when I right click on the position fusion-icon or power-manager respond I just can't see them smile)

@Maledictvm

Ur wright, panel can be shrinked to 24px and below it's not responding, but that doesn't annoy me, I keep it @25...

Offline

#59 2009-09-24 13:23:46

Thek586
Member
From: Fr
Registered: 2009-07-30
Posts: 10

Re: gnome unstable repository

combuster wrote:

@Thek586

I had these problems with gnome 2.26 also, but now in 2.28 it's getting worse, sometimes entire notification area in panel is gray, I can't even see the icons (although when I right click on the position fusion-icon or power-manager respond I just can't see them smile)

mkay
Edit: After another reboot, yes, it's getting really worse:
GnomePanelGreywtf.png
Thanks
so, i'm going to do a bug report smile

Last edited by Thek586 (2009-09-24 14:07:34)

Offline

#60 2009-09-24 14:31:39

ngoonee
Forum Fellow
From: Between Thailand and Singapore
Registered: 2009-03-17
Posts: 6,791

Re: gnome unstable repository

JGC, is evolution-mapi any closer to getting included? I'd presume samba4 is still a blocker? Tinuva meantioned that samba 3.4 includes the samba4 source which can be enabled with --enable-merged-build. Seems a follow-on from the Franky project.

What I've noticed is that our samba hasn't upped from 3.37, is there a reason for that?


Allan-Volunteer on the (topic being discussed) mailn lists. You never get the people who matters attention on the forums.
jasonwryan-Installing Arch is a measure of your literacy. Maintaining Arch is a measure of your diligence. Contributing to Arch is a measure of your competence.
Griemak-Bleeding edge, not bleeding flat. Edge denotes falls will occur from time to time. Bring your own parachute.

Offline

#61 2009-09-24 15:43:03

uorbe001
Member
Registered: 2008-04-11
Posts: 27

Re: gnome unstable repository

I'd like to use the sound-applet on Ubuntu Karmic's alphas on Arch because it makes a lot easier to use bluetooth hadsets (I've not been able to make them work without that thing before), anyone knows if it's possible to use it? At least the name of the package where it should be?

Offline

#62 2009-09-24 15:57:44

wonder
Developer
From: Bucharest, Romania
Registered: 2006-07-05
Posts: 5,937
Website

Re: gnome unstable repository

i have a minor problem bluetooth-applet

* (bluetooth-applet:8722): WARNING **: Could not open RFKILL control device, please verify your installation

does anyone know how can i fix that? policykit is set up correctly, i think:D .  in fact doesn't work at all, scanning doesn't detect anything but in console hcitool is working.

Last edited by wonder (2009-09-24 16:04:27)


Give what you have. To someone, it may be better than you dare to think.
Blog

Offline

#63 2009-09-24 18:57:23

combuster
Member
From: Serbia
Registered: 2008-09-30
Posts: 711
Website

Re: gnome unstable repository

I've just browsed my motorola krazr k1 with bluetooth-applet...

Offline

#64 2009-09-24 22:20:15

Vamp898
Member
From: ドイツではまだ住んでいる
Registered: 2009-01-03
Posts: 866
Website

Re: gnome unstable repository

error: failed to prepare transaction (could not satisfy dependencies)
:: Starting full system upgrade...
resolving dependencies...
:: the following package(s) cannot be upgraded due to unresolvable dependencies:
      alacarte  gnome-themes  
:: alacarte: requires gnome-menus>=2.28.0
:: gnome-themes: requires gtk-engines>=2.18.3

Offline

#65 2009-09-24 22:37:30

ahioros
Member
From: Panamá
Registered: 2005-11-26
Posts: 41
Website

Re: gnome unstable repository

It works fine for me :-) everything works
Thanks... just why gnome-terminal-2.26.x  ??

Offline

#66 2009-09-25 02:15:23

ahioros
Member
From: Panamá
Registered: 2005-11-26
Posts: 41
Website

Re: gnome unstable repository

PKGBUILD gnome-terminal

pkgname=gnome-terminal
pkgver=2.28.0
pkgrel=1
pkgdesc="The GNOME Terminal Emulator"
arch=(i686 x86_64)
license=('GPL')
depends=('gconf>=2.28.0' 'vte>=0.22.0' 'startup-notification>=0.10')
makedepends=('pkgconfig' 'gnome-doc-utils>=0.18.0' 'intltool')
options=('!emptydirs')
url="http://www.gnome.org"
groups=('gnome-extra')
install=gnome-terminal.install
source=(http://ftp.gnome.org/pub/gnome/sources/${pkgname}/2.28/${pkgname}-${pkgver}.tar.bz2
    )
md5sums=('9cdc3581a03a44dd693663991d1c1e9f')
build() {
  cd "${srcdir}/${pkgname}-${pkgver}"
  ./configure --prefix=/usr --sysconfdir=/etc \
      --localstatedir=/var --disable-scrollkeeper || return 1
  make || return 1
  make GCONF_DISABLE_MAKEFILE_SCHEMA_INSTALL=1 DESTDIR="${pkgdir}" install || return 1
 
  install -m755 -d "${pkgdir}/usr/share/gconf/schemas"
  gconf-merge-schema "${pkgdir}/usr/share/gconf/schemas/${pkgname}.schemas" --domain gnome-terminal ${pkgdir}/etc/gconf/schemas/*.schemas || return 1
  rm -f ${pkgdir}/etc/gconf/schemas/*.schemas
}

Offline

#67 2009-09-25 07:57:54

nTia89
Banned
From: varese, italy
Registered: 2008-12-22
Posts: 1,230

Re: gnome unstable repository

hi i've see that "gnome-system-tools" there is not...

can you package it, please

thanks


+pc: custom | AMD Opteron 175 | nForce4 Ultra | 2GB ram DDR400 | nVidia 9800GT 1GB | ArchLinux x86_64 w/ openbox
+laptop: Apple | MacBook (2,1) | 2GB ram | Mac OS X 10.4 -> DIED
+ultrabook: Dell | XPS 13 (9343) | 8GB ram | 256GB ssd | FullHD display | Windows 8.1 64bit ArchLinux x86_64 w/ Gnome

Offline

#68 2009-09-25 09:03:33

wonder
Developer
From: Bucharest, Romania
Registered: 2006-07-05
Posts: 5,937
Website

Re: gnome unstable repository

nTia89 wrote:

hi i've see that "gnome-system-tools" there is not...

can you package it, please

thanks

is it in community. you have to wait till is moved in testing or extra


Give what you have. To someone, it may be better than you dare to think.
Blog

Offline

#69 2009-09-25 09:21:22

jordz
Member
Registered: 2006-02-01
Posts: 246

Re: gnome unstable repository

Do all mirrors sync this repository?

Edit:
Yes they do.
I tried the x86_64 packages, the update went very smooth, thanks!

Last edited by jordz (2009-09-25 11:48:49)

Offline

#70 2009-09-25 14:06:18

flamelab
Member
From: Athens, Hellas (Greece)
Registered: 2007-12-26
Posts: 2,160

Re: gnome unstable repository

Very weird pacman (from testing) behaviour:
gnometerminalpacman.png w704.png
http://img132.imageshack.us/img132/6858 … pacman.png


:: Retrieving packages from gnome-unstable...
 glib2-2.22.0-1-x86_64      2.8M 1245.0K/s 00:00:02 [#########################]   3%
 atk-1.28.0-1-x86_64        3.1M  757.3K/s 00:00:04 [#########################]   4%
 pango-1.26.0-1-x86_64      3.8M  565.3K/s 00:00:07 [#########################]   5%
 gtk2-2.18.0-1-x86_64      12.8M  482.3K/s 00:00:27 [#########################]  17%
 libwebkit-1.1.15-1-...    19.7M  472.4K/s 00:00:43 [#########################]  27%
 gconf-2.28.0-1-x86_64     21.5M  467.4K/s 00:00:47 [#########################]  30%
 gnome-keyring-2.28....    23.0M  462.9K/s 00:00:51 [#########################]  32%
 libwnck-2.28.0-1-x86_64   23.5M  458.5K/s 00:00:53 [#########################]  33%
 pygobject-2.19.0-1-...    24.0M  454.8K/s 00:00:54 [#########################]  33%
 pygtk-2.16.0-1-x86_64     26.5M  451.7K/s 00:01:00 [#########################]  37%
 gnome-menus-2.28.0-...    26.8M  448.0K/s 00:01:01 [#########################]  37%
 libgweather-2.28.0-...    33.4M  448.9K/s 00:01:16 [#########################]  46%
 libbonobo-2.24.2-1-...    34.4M  445.5K/s 00:01:19 [#########################]  48%
 evolution-data-serv...    39.1M  445.1K/s 00:01:30 [#########################]  54%
 libgnome-2.28.0-1-x...    40.4M  439.6K/s 00:01:34 [#########################]  56%
 libbonoboui-2.24.2-...    41.0M  436.6K/s 00:01:36 [#########################]  57%
 libgnomeui-2.24.2-1...    42.2M  434.7K/s 00:01:39 [#########################]  59%
 libgtop-2.28.0-1-x86_64   42.4M  432.3K/s 00:01:40 [#########################]  59%
 libxklavier-4.0-1-x...    42.5M  430.3K/s 00:01:41 [#########################]  59%
 libgnomekbd-2.28.0-...    42.6M  428.1K/s 00:01:42 [#########################]  59%
 gnome-backgrounds-2...    52.0M  430.5K/s 00:02:04 [#########################]  73%
 gnome-icon-theme-2....    55.5M  428.0K/s 00:02:13 [#########################]  78%
 devicekit-power-010...    55.6M  425.8K/s 00:02:14 [#########################]  78%
 gtk-engines-2.18.3-...    56.0M  421.5K/s 00:02:16 [#########################]  78%
 gnome-doc-utils-0.1...    56.5M  416.6K/s 00:02:19 [#########################]  79%
 gnome2-user-docs-2....    70.6M  421.4K/s 00:02:52 [#########################]  99%
 libgphoto2-2.4.6-3-...    71.6M  467.7K/s 1193046:28:15 [###############----------] libgphoto2-2.4.6-3-...    71.7M  468.9K/s 1193046:28:15 [################---------] libgphoto2-2.4.6-3-...    71.8M  469.8K/s 1193046:28:15 [##################-------] libgphoto2-2.4.6-3-...    71.9M  470.5K/s 1193046:28:15 [####################-----] libgphoto2-2.4.6-3-...    72.0M  470.6K/s 1193046:28:15 [#####################----] libgphoto2-2.4.6-3-...    72.1M  468.9K/s 1193046:28:14 [#######################--] libgphoto2-2.4.6-3-...    72.2M  469.5K/s 1193046:28:14 [########################-] libgphoto2-2.4.6-3-...    72.3M  421.2K/s 00:02:56 [#########################] 101%
 gnome-python-2.28.0...    72.3M  369.3K/s 1193046:28:13 [-------------------------] gnome-python-2.28.0...    72.3M  294.6K/s 1193046:28:12 [###----------------------] gnome-python-2.28.0...    72.4M  331.1K/s 1193046:28:13 [##########---------------] gnome-python-2.28.0...    72.5M  377.9K/s 1193046:28:13 [###################------] gnome-python-2.28.0...    72.6M  420.1K/s 00:02:57 [#########################] 102%
 gnome-python-deskto...    72.6M  308.9K/s 1193046:28:12 [-------------------------] gnome-python-deskto...    72.6M  265.3K/s 1193046:28:11 [###----------------------] gnome-python-deskto...    72.7M  318.4K/s 1193046:28:11 [#########----------------] gnome-python-deskto...    72.8M  369.4K/s 1193046:28:12 [#################--------] gnome-python-deskto...    72.9M  403.6K/s 1193046:28:12 [########################-] gnome-python-deskto...    72.9M  419.2K/s 00:02:58 [#########################] 102%
 libsigc++2.0-2.2.4....    72.9M  295.7K/s 1193046:28:10 [-------------------------] libsigc++2.0-2.2.4....    73.0M  259.1K/s 1193046:28:09 [-------------------------] libsigc++2.0-2.2.4....    73.0M  313.8K/s 1193046:28:10 [-------------------------] libsigc++2.0-2.2.4....    73.1M  366.3K/s 1193046:28:11 [#------------------------] libsigc++2.0-2.2.4....    73.2M  401.6K/s 1193046:28:11 [##-----------------------] libsigc++2.0-2.2.4....    73.3M  422.3K/s 1193046:28:11 [###----------------------] libsigc++2.0-2.2.4....    73.4M  438.7K/s 1193046:28:11 [###----------------------] libsigc++2.0-2.2.4....    73.5M  449.5K/s 1193046:28:11 [####---------------------] libsigc++2.0-2.2.4....    73.6M  457.1K/s 1193046:28:11 [#####--------------------] libsigc++2.0-2.2.4....    73.7M  461.7K/s 1193046:28:11 [#####--------------------] libsigc++2.0-2.2.4....    73.8M  464.9K/s 1193046:28:11 [######-------------------] libsigc++2.0-2.2.4....    73.9M  467.1K/s 1193046:28:10 [#######------------------] libsigc++2.0-2.2.4....    74.0M  468.5K/s 1193046:28:10 [########-----------------] libsigc++2.0-2.2.4....    74.1M  469.5K/s 1193046:28:10 [########-----------------] libsigc++2.0-2.2.4....    74.2M  468.0K/s 1193046:28:10 [#########----------------] libsigc++2.0-2.2.4....    74.3M  469.0K/s 1193046:28:09 [##########---------------] libsigc++2.0-2.2.4....    74.4M  469.8K/s 1193046:28:09 [##########---------------] libsigc++2.0-2.2.4....    74.5M  470.1K/s 1193046:28:09 [###########--------------] libsigc++2.0-2.2.4....    74.6M  470.7K/s 1193046:28:09 [############-------------] libsigc++2.0-2.2.4....    74.7M  470.7K/s 1193046:28:09 [#############------------] libsigc++2.0-2.2.4....    74.8M  471.2K/s 1193046:28:08 [#############------------] libsigc++2.0-2.2.4....    74.9M  471.3K/s 1193046:28:08 [##############-----------] libsigc++2.0-2.2.4....    75.0M  377.7K/s 1193046:28:06 [##############-----------] libsigc++2.0-2.2.4....    75.2M  574.4K/s 1193046:28:09 [################---------] libsigc++2.0-2.2.4....    75.3M  540.3K/s 1193046:28:09 [#################--------] libsigc++2.0-2.2.4....    75.4M  515.0K/s 1193046:28:08 [#################--------] libsigc++2.0-2.2.4....    75.5M  500.5K/s 1193046:28:08 [##################-------] libsigc++2.0-2.2.4....    75.6M  490.6K/s 1193046:28:07 [###################------] libsigc++2.0-2.2.4....    75.7M  484.2K/s 1193046:28:07 [####################-----] libsigc++2.0-2.2.4....    75.8M  479.9K/s 1193046:28:07 [####################-----] libsigc++2.0-2.2.4....    75.9M  477.1K/s 1193046:28:06 [#####################----] libsigc++2.0-2.2.4....    75.9M  475.0K/s 1193046:28:06 [######################---] libsigc++2.0-2.2.4....    76.0M  393.3K/s 1193046:28:04 [######################---] libsigc++2.0-2.2.4....    76.2M  568.0K/s 1193046:28:07 [########################-] libsigc++2.0-2.2.4....    76.3M  535.9K/s 1193046:28:07 [########################-] libsigc++2.0-2.2.4....    76.4M  512.3K/s 1193046:28:06 [#########################] libsigc++2.0-2.2.4....    76.5M  420.2K/s 00:03:06 [#########################] 107%
 poppler-0.12.0-1-x86_64   76.5M  383.9K/s 1193046:28:02 [-------------------------] poppler-0.12.0-1-x86_64   76.5M  304.6K/s 1193046:27:58 [-------------------------] poppler-0.12.0-1-x86_64   76.6M  340.6K/s 1193046:28:00 [###----------------------] poppler-0.12.0-1-x86_64   76.7M  384.1K/s 1193046:28:02 [#####--------------------] poppler-0.12.0-1-x86_64   76.8M  413.2K/s 1193046:28:02 [########-----------------] poppler-0.12.0-1-x86_64   76.9M  432.6K/s 1193046:28:03 [##########---------------] poppler-0.12.0-1-x86_64   77.0M  443.4K/s 1193046:28:03 [#############------------] poppler-0.12.0-1-x86_64   77.1M  452.5K/s 1193046:28:03 [################---------] poppler-0.12.0-1-x86_64   77.2M  458.6K/s 1193046:28:03 [##################-------] poppler-0.12.0-1-x86_64   77.3M  463.1K/s 1193046:28:03 [#####################----] poppler-0.12.0-1-x86_64   77.4M  465.9K/s 1193046:28:03 [#######################--] poppler-0.12.0-1-x86_64   77.4M  419.6K/s 00:03:09 [#########################] 108%
 poppler-glib-0.12.0...    77.5M  368.3K/s 1193046:27:59 [#------------------------] poppler-glib-0.12.0...    77.5M  307.6K/s 1193046:27:55 [#########----------------] poppler-glib-0.12.0...    77.6M  418.7K/s 00:03:10 [#########################] 109%
 libpst-0.6.41-1-x86_64    77.6M  261.0K/s 1193046:27:51 [-------------------------] libpst-0.6.41-1-x86_64    77.6M  222.4K/s 1193046:27:47 [#------------------------] libpst-0.6.41-1-x86_64    77.7M  286.3K/s 1193046:27:53 [######-------------------] libpst-0.6.41-1-x86_64    77.8M  347.8K/s 1193046:27:57 [##########---------------] libpst-0.6.41-1-x86_64    77.9M  389.2K/s 1193046:27:59 [###############----------] libpst-0.6.41-1-x86_64    78.0M  416.4K/s 1193046:28:00 [####################-----] libpst-0.6.41-1-x86_64    78.0M  296.2K/s 1193046:27:53 [#####################----] libpst-0.6.41-1-x86_64    78.1M  417.6K/s 00:03:12 [#########################] 109%
 gtksourceview2-2.8....    78.1M  290.2K/s 1193046:27:52 [-------------------------] gtksourceview2-2.8....    78.2M  255.6K/s 1193046:27:48 [#------------------------] gtksourceview2-2.8....    78.2M  311.9K/s 1193046:27:53 [###----------------------] gtksourceview2-2.8....    78.3M  365.3K/s 1193046:27:56 [#######------------------] gtksourceview2-2.8....    78.4M  400.6K/s 1193046:27:58 [#########----------------] gtksourceview2-2.8....    78.5M  421.9K/s 1193046:27:58 [############-------------] gtksourceview2-2.8....    78.6M  438.4K/s 1193046:27:59 [###############----------] gtksourceview2-2.8....    78.7M  449.4K/s 1193046:27:59 [##################-------] gtksourceview2-2.8....    78.8M  456.7K/s 1193046:27:59 [#####################----] gtksourceview2-2.8....    78.9M  461.8K/s 1193046:27:59 [########################-] gtksourceview2-2.8....    79.0M  417.1K/s 00:03:14 [#########################] 111%
 pygtksourceview2-2....    79.0M  343.3K/s 1193046:27:53 [#######------------------] pygtksourceview2-2....    79.0M  416.0K/s 00:03:14 [#########################] 111%
 gnome-games-extra-d...    79.0M  249.7K/s 1193046:27:44 [-------------------------] gnome-games-extra-d...    79.1M  228.2K/s 1193046:27:41 [-------------------------] gnome-games-extra-d...    79.1M  293.8K/s 1193046:27:48 [-------------------------] gnome-games-extra-d...    79.2M  353.0K/s 1193046:27:53 [#------------------------] gnome-games-extra-d...    79.3M  392.5K/s 1193046:27:55 [##-----------------------] gnome-games-extra-d...    79.4M  416.7K/s 1193046:27:56 [##-----------------------] gnome-games-extra-d...    79.5M  435.2K/s 1193046:27:57 [###----------------------] gnome-games-extra-d...    79.6M  447.1K/s 1193046:27:57 [###----------------------] gnome-games-extra-d...    79.7M  455.4K/s 1193046:27:57 [####---------------------] gnome-games-extra-d...    79.8M  460.5K/s 1193046:27:57 [#####--------------------] gnome-games-extra-d...    79.9M  464.0K/s 1193046:27:57 [#####--------------------] gnome-games-extra-d...    80.0M  466.3K/s 1193046:27:57 [######-------------------] gnome-games-extra-d...    80.1M  468.0K/s 1193046:27:57 [#######------------------] gnome-games-extra-d...    80.2M  469.1K/s 1193046:27:57 [#######------------------] gnome-games-extra-d...    80.3M  467.9K/s 1193046:27:56 [########-----------------] gnome-games-extra-d...    80.4M  469.1K/s 1193046:27:56 [#########----------------] gnome-games-extra-d...    80.5M  469.9K/s 1193046:27:56 [#########----------------] gnome-games-extra-d...    80.6M  470.2K/s 1193046:27:56 [##########---------------] gnome-games-extra-d...    80.7M  470.8K/s 1193046:27:56 [###########--------------] gnome-games-extra-d...    80.8M  469.9K/s 1193046:27:55 [###########--------------] gnome-games-extra-d...    80.9M  471.5K/s 1193046:27:55 [############-------------] gnome-games-extra-d...    81.0M  471.5K/s 1193046:27:55 [#############------------] gnome-games-extra-d...    81.0M  347.2K/s 1193046:27:47 [#############------------] gnome-games-extra-d...    81.2M  537.6K/s 1193046:27:57 [##############-----------] gnome-games-extra-d...    81.3M  515.4K/s 1193046:27:56 [###############----------] gnome-games-extra-d...    81.4M  500.5K/s 1193046:27:55 [###############----------] gnome-games-extra-d...    81.5M  491.0K/s 1193046:27:55 [################---------] gnome-games-extra-d...    81.6M  484.5K/s 1193046:27:54 [#################--------] gnome-games-extra-d...    81.7M  480.3K/s 1193046:27:54 [#################--------] gnome-games-extra-d...    81.8M  477.4K/s 1193046:27:54 [##################-------] gnome-games-extra-d...    81.9M  473.4K/s 1193046:27:53 [##################-------] gnome-games-extra-d...    81.9M  340.9K/s 1193046:27:44 [###################------] gnome-games-extra-d...    82.1M  555.0K/s 1193046:27:56 [####################-----] gnome-games-extra-d...    82.2M  527.3K/s 1193046:27:55 [#####################----] gnome-games-extra-d...    82.3M  411.5K/s 1193046:27:49 [#####################----] gnome-games-extra-d...    82.4M  557.0K/s 1193046:27:56 [######################---] gnome-games-extra-d...    82.5M  528.7K/s 1193046:27:54 [#######################--] gnome-games-extra-d...    82.6M  508.7K/s 1193046:27:53 [#######################--] gnome-games-extra-d...    82.7M  496.3K/s 1193046:27:53 [########################-] gnome-games-extra-d...    82.8M  487.9K/s 1193046:27:52 [#########################] gnome-games-extra-d...    82.9M  417.1K/s 00:03:24 [#########################] 116%
 glibmm-2.22.1-1-x86_64    82.9M  386.3K/s 1193046:27:45 [-------------------------] glibmm-2.22.1-1-x86_64    83.0M  306.1K/s 1193046:27:37 [-------------------------] glibmm-2.22.1-1-x86_64    83.0M  341.5K/s 1193046:27:41 [-------------------------] glibmm-2.22.1-1-x86_64    83.1M  384.8K/s 1193046:27:44 [#------------------------] glibmm-2.22.1-1-x86_64    83.2M  413.7K/s 1193046:27:46 [##-----------------------] glibmm-2.22.1-1-x86_64    83.3M  433.1K/s 1193046:27:48 [###----------------------] glibmm-2.22.1-1-x86_64    83.4M  397.1K/s 1193046:27:45 [###----------------------] glibmm-2.22.1-1-x86_64    83.6M  483.5K/s 1193046:27:50 [####---------------------] glibmm-2.22.1-1-x86_64    83.7M  479.5K/s 1193046:27:50 [#####--------------------] glibmm-2.22.1-1-x86_64    83.8M  477.0K/s 1193046:27:49 [######-------------------] glibmm-2.22.1-1-x86_64    83.9M  474.8K/s 1193046:27:49 [#######------------------] glibmm-2.22.1-1-x86_64    83.9M  473.8K/s 1193046:27:49 [#######------------------] glibmm-2.22.1-1-x86_64    84.0M  470.9K/s 1193046:27:48 [########-----------------] glibmm-2.22.1-1-x86_64    84.1M  471.2K/s 1193046:27:48 [#########----------------] glibmm-2.22.1-1-x86_64    84.2M  470.8K/s 1193046:27:48 [##########---------------] glibmm-2.22.1-1-x86_64    84.3M  471.5K/s 1193046:27:48 [##########---------------] glibmm-2.22.1-1-x86_64    84.4M  471.5K/s 1193046:27:48 [###########--------------] glibmm-2.22.1-1-x86_64    84.5M  471.6K/s 1193046:27:47 [############-------------] glibmm-2.22.1-1-x86_64    84.6M  471.2K/s 1193046:27:47 [#############------------] glibmm-2.22.1-1-x86_64    84.7M  471.4K/s 1193046:27:47 [#############------------] glibmm-2.22.1-1-x86_64    84.8M  471.6K/s 1193046:27:47 [##############-----------] glibmm-2.22.1-1-x86_64    84.9M  468.6K/s 1193046:27:46 [###############----------] glibmm-2.22.1-1-x86_64    85.0M  470.4K/s 1193046:27:46 [###############----------] glibmm-2.22.1-1-x86_64    85.1M  470.7K/s 1193046:27:46 [################---------] glibmm-2.22.1-1-x86_64    85.2M  470.7K/s 1193046:27:46 [#################--------] glibmm-2.22.1-1-x86_64    85.3M  380.9K/s 1193046:27:38 [##################-------] glibmm-2.22.1-1-x86_64    85.5M  575.1K/s 1193046:27:51 [###################------] glibmm-2.22.1-1-x86_64    85.6M  540.7K/s 1193046:27:49 [####################-----] glibmm-2.22.1-1-x86_64    85.7M  517.6K/s 1193046:27:48 [#####################----] glibmm-2.22.1-1-x86_64    85.8M  502.4K/s 1193046:27:47 [#####################----] glibmm-2.22.1-1-x86_64    85.9M  489.9K/s 1193046:27:46 [######################---] glibmm-2.22.1-1-x86_64    86.0M  483.9K/s 1193046:27:45 [#######################--] glibmm-2.22.1-1-x86_64    86.1M  479.8K/s 1193046:27:45 [########################-] glibmm-2.22.1-1-x86_64    86.2M  391.6K/s 1193046:27:37 [########################-] glibmm-2.22.1-1-x86_64    86.3M  418.0K/s 00:03:31 [#########################] 121%

------------


ALSO: These packages aren't on gnome or gnome-extra group: (I found out that some packages from gnome-unstable weren't downloaded so I did:

pacman -S `pacman -Sl gnome-unstable | awk '{print $2}'`
:: Retrieving packages from gnome-unstable...
 consolekit-0.3.1-1-...   110.3K  159.1K/s 00:00:01 [#####################]   1%
 epiphany-extensions...  1580.6K  352.7K/s 00:00:04 [#####################]  23%
 gconfmm-2.28.0-1-x86_64 1624.3K  317.1K/s 00:00:05 [#####################]  23%
 gnome-bluetooth-2.2...     2.1M  309.5K/s 00:00:07 [#####################]  32%
 gnome-common-2.28.0...     2.1M  291.3K/s 00:00:08 [#####################]  32%
 gnome-user-share-2....     2.7M  291.0K/s 00:00:10 [#####################]  41%
 gobject-introspecti...     3.2M  291.9K/s 00:00:11 [#####################]  48%
 libgnomemm-2.28.0-1...     3.3M  280.8K/s 00:00:12 [#####################]  49%
 libgnomeuimm-2.28.0...     3.4M  272.9K/s 00:00:13 [#####################]  51%
 nautilus-sendto-2.2...     3.6M  264.1K/s 00:00:14 [#####################]  53%
 poppler-qt-0.12.0-1...     3.8M  258.8K/s 00:00:15 [#####################]  56%
 poppler-qt3-0.12.0-...     3.8M  251.0K/s 00:00:16 [#####################]  57%
 totem-plugin-2.28.0...     4.0M  246.9K/s 00:00:17 [#####################]  60%

Last edited by flamelab (2009-09-25 14:26:23)

Offline

#71 2009-09-25 14:17:05

nTia89
Banned
From: varese, italy
Registered: 2008-12-22
Posts: 1,230

Re: gnome unstable repository

wonder wrote:
nTia89 wrote:

hi i've see that "gnome-system-tools" there is not...

can you package it, please

thanks

is it in community. you have to wait till is moved in testing or extra

sorry i've forget to write Update

PS also gdm is very old ...


+pc: custom | AMD Opteron 175 | nForce4 Ultra | 2GB ram DDR400 | nVidia 9800GT 1GB | ArchLinux x86_64 w/ openbox
+laptop: Apple | MacBook (2,1) | 2GB ram | Mac OS X 10.4 -> DIED
+ultrabook: Dell | XPS 13 (9343) | 8GB ram | 256GB ssd | FullHD display | Windows 8.1 64bit ArchLinux x86_64 w/ Gnome

Offline

#72 2009-09-25 14:51:19

shining
Pacman Developer
Registered: 2006-05-10
Posts: 2,043

Re: gnome unstable repository

flamelab wrote:

Very weird pacman (from testing) behaviour:

Yeah the same thing happened to me. Read more about it here :
http://mailman.archlinux.org/pipermail/ … 09575.html
To sum up :
when adding "any" packages (which are symlinks) to the database with repo-add, stupid repo-add used the size of the symlink instead of size of the real destination file. So the database is messed up for any packages. And these wrong size info from the database are used for download progress when you use TotalDownload. (otherwise they are only used to show the download size before downloading).

However it's not specific to gnome-unstable so no need to hijack that thread more
(but it's not something you could have known smile)


pacman roulette : pacman -S $(pacman -Slq | LANG=C sort -R | head -n $((RANDOM % 10)))

Offline

#73 2009-09-25 14:53:12

shining
Pacman Developer
Registered: 2006-05-10
Posts: 2,043

Re: gnome unstable repository

So no one having troubles with the latest i686 packages ? I had big troubles after the last update yesterday, most gnome apps would just crash, segfault or fail to load. But I have not been able to investigate what the real issue was.


pacman roulette : pacman -S $(pacman -Slq | LANG=C sort -R | head -n $((RANDOM % 10)))

Offline

#74 2009-09-25 14:56:20

wonder
Developer
From: Bucharest, Romania
Registered: 2006-07-05
Posts: 5,937
Website

Re: gnome unstable repository

shining wrote:

So no one having troubles with the latest i686 packages ? I had big troubles after the last update yesterday, most gnome apps would just crash, segfault or fail to load. But I have not been able to investigate what the real issue was.

what packages are you talking about. maybe they come in x86_64 too. personally i didn't noticed any problems, except the bluetooth


Give what you have. To someone, it may be better than you dare to think.
Blog

Offline

#75 2009-09-25 15:03:14

flamelab
Member
From: Athens, Hellas (Greece)
Registered: 2007-12-26
Posts: 2,160

Re: gnome unstable repository

shining wrote:

(but it's not something you could have known smile

That's why I wrote "weird pacman behaviour" but not "group/packaging behaviour". I hope that there is gonna be a fix soon for that smile

-------

GNOME here (x64) can't start properly. Gnome-settings-daemon has a weird output (nothing useful), and there seem to be a metacity loading issue (from files within ~/.config/metacity).
I reinstalled GNOME 2.26 and there is no problem. Is it an upstream issue or a packaging one ? (schemas to be created for gconf ?)

Offline

Board footer

Powered by FluxBB