You are not logged in.
Google Chrome BETA now available for Linux.
Whether Chrome will become the competition Firefox?
I will certainly switch to Chrome.
Offline
Cool, but i wait for Iron browser. Too much tracking for my taste in chrome.
Now we wait response from Firefox team.
But who can choose theese days?? Arora is awsome, Midori is getting better, Chromium is one of many webkit based browsers...
Offline
Is it open source or not? It's really confusing.
Personally, I'd rather be back in Hobbiton.
Offline
Chromium is open source. Chrome is the one Google builds and has some other kinky stuff: http://code.google.com/p/chromium/wiki/ … ogleChrome
I want to switch to Chromium so bad, but I can't live without Vimperator. Somebody, please, port it over!
Offline
Cool, but i wait for Iron browser. Too much tracking for my taste in chrome.
Iron is in AUR now http://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=29218
Offline
I wonder if this beta release will be the signal for TUs to put some form of Chrome/Chromium/Iron into community.
It's too bad there's still no native 64-bit Iron.
Offline
I wonder if this beta release will be the signal for TUs to put some form of Chrome/Chromium/Iron into community.
It's too bad there's still no native 64-bit Iron.
not really:D they still not have a tarball for this beta. i don't want to download 1gb or to generate myself a tarball for that.
Give what you have. To someone, it may be better than you dare to think.
Offline
I'll stick with pure Chromium. I don't trust SRWare's Iron browser.
Offline
I'll stick with pure Chromium. I don't trust SRWare's Iron browser.
Any reason why? It is open source...
Offline
Duplicates thread:
http://bbs.archlinux.org/viewtopic.php?id=73457
Last edited by Gen2ly (2009-12-09 05:45:17)
Setting Up a Scripting Environment | Proud donor to wikipedia - link
Offline
fx4 wrote:I'll stick with pure Chromium. I don't trust SRWare's Iron browser.
Any reason why? It is open source...
fx4 has a point.
Did you try building Iron from source(especially for x86_64)? How can a browser promotes itself for security If you can't build it from source.
English is not my native language .
Offline
I'm just trying iron now. I like it but I can't shade the window
btw, can anyone get extensions to install from the website? www.chromeextensions.org
I keep getting the message:
"Required value 'default_title' is missing or invalid'
Last edited by sand_man (2009-12-09 09:25:54)
Offline
Looks like Chrome uses Xsettings. Try specifying your font configuration in ~/.Xdefaults:
!Xft.dpi: 89
Xft.antialias: true
Xft.rgba: rgb
Xft.hinting: true
Xft.hintstyle: hintslight
Or whatever settings you use.
Last edited by Gen2ly (2009-12-09 10:06:37)
Setting Up a Scripting Environment | Proud donor to wikipedia - link
Offline
Looks like Chrome uses Xsettings. Try specifying your font configuration in ~/.Xdefaults:
!Xft.dpi: 89 Xft.antialias: true Xft.rgba: rgb Xft.hinting: true Xft.hintstyle: hintslight
Or whatever settings you use.
It didn't do the trick. I might be a bug of some kind.
http://code.google.com/p/chromium/issue … l?id=25365
http://trac.webkit.org/changeset/49909
Γίνε ρεαλιστής, μείνε ονειροπόλος ...
Offline
Nice that --pinned-tab-count=n http://your_address_here.com http://your_other_addresses_here.com works now. One feature I've been really waiting for.
Offline
I downloaded the 32bit rpm for my pure 32bit system.
Install like this,
rpmextract.sh googlecrhomeblabla.rpm
then as root
mv opt/google /opt
mv usr/bin/google-chrome /usr/bin
mv usr/share/man/man1/google-chrome.1 /usr/share/man/man1/
cd /usr/lib
ln -s libnss3.so libnss3.so.1d
ln -s libnssutil3.so libnssutil3.so.1d
ln -s libsmime3.so libsmime3.so.1d
ln -s libssl3.so libssl3.so.1d
ln -s libplds4.so libplds4.so.0d
ln -s libplc4.so libplc4.so.0d
ln -s libnspr4.so libnspr4.so.0d
cp /home/uruser/.Xauthority /root/
then start google-chrome
And my impression is like meh. Compared loading time of docs.google.com and mail.google.com with that in firefox, and no difference. Notice my sistem is amd barton 2800+ from like 2004, 1.5GB ram. old pata disk.
Linux user since redhat 6.1. former gentooer, former slacker. Now arher.
Offline
Pierre posted today in arch-dev-public that he intends to put chromium (not chrome) in extra. Looking forward to it!
Offline
I downloaded the 32bit rpm for my pure 32bit system.
Install like this,
rpmextract.sh googlecrhomeblabla.rpmthen as root
mv opt/google /opt
mv usr/bin/google-chrome /usr/bin
mv usr/share/man/man1/google-chrome.1 /usr/share/man/man1/
cd /usr/lib
ln -s libnss3.so libnss3.so.1d
ln -s libnssutil3.so libnssutil3.so.1d
ln -s libsmime3.so libsmime3.so.1d
ln -s libssl3.so libssl3.so.1d
ln -s libplds4.so libplds4.so.0d
ln -s libplc4.so libplc4.so.0d
ln -s libnspr4.so libnspr4.so.0d
cp /home/uruser/.Xauthority /root/then start google-chrome
why not google-chrome-beta from aur? get tarball, extract, makepkg -i and start chrome:D
Give what you have. To someone, it may be better than you dare to think.
Offline
antonikus, that kind of solution (symlinking library versions) can seriously screw over your Arch install. Be careful.
Offline
Iron is so untrustworth, has anyone tried to get the source? there is a tiny link that is on rapidshare. anyone legit would not use rapid share IMHO. who wants to wait 90 seconds to download something, then get a crappeh 100kb/s
not to mention once you download it, it's a giant confusing tarbomb of crap.
no clear instructions on building.
also it's always behind chromium builds.
Chrome is the way to go, or chromium. i don't care if google tracks me, everyone else already does!
Offline
i don't care if google tracks me
That's the good ol' American spirit.
Offline
It's in the AUR now!
Offline
The devs are talking about putting chromium in [community]
That's more interesting then that google is building it for ubuntu users.
Offline
Iron is so untrustworth, has anyone tried to get the source? there is a tiny link that is on rapidshare. anyone legit would not use rapid share IMHO. who wants to wait 90 seconds to download something, then get a crappeh 100kb/s
not to mention once you download it, it's a giant confusing tarbomb of crap.
no clear instructions on building.
also it's always behind chromium builds.
Word. I've also thought about trying out Iron, but then... rapidshare links? WTF? In the age of google code, sourceforge etc? That is just like saying: Yes, we develop opensource software, but we make it hard to reach (and therefore maintain) the code, because we do some bad things with it we do not want anyone to know.
Chrome is the way to go, or chromium. i don't care if google tracks me, everyone else already does!
I don't agree at all with this. I do care about privacy and I wonder whether chromium also has googles tracking "features".
Last edited by thoughtcrime (2009-12-10 17:12:14)
- blog (about arch and other stuff): http://thoughtyblog.wordpress.com/
- x86_64 user
Offline