You are not logged in.
Pages: 1
I would like to test out 2.6.32-1 from [testing] to see if my wifi behaves better, so I enabled the teseting repo in pacman.conf.
What's the best way to test? I know I will add a 3rd kernel line to menu.lst for GRUB, but what is the best way to resolve the dependencies of the new kernel, etc.?
Should I just download the package from the AUR and install manually, or what?
Thanks in advance.
Offline
You will not need to add another line in grub. It will upgrade your kernel like any other kernel update. Just "pacman -Syu" and reboot.
Offline
You will not need to add another line in grub. It will upgrade your kernel like any other kernel update. Just "pacman -Syu" and reboot.
I see. I guess I overthought it, LOL. So what about any conflicting dependencies, such as Virtualbox kernel module, etc.? To roll back is it as simple as:
commenting out [testing] in pacman.conf
sudo pacman -Scc
sudo pacman -Syu
reboot
?
EDIT:
Yea I knew it would kick out a dependency problem for vboxdrv:
error: failed to prepare transaction (could not satisfy dependencies)
:: virtualbox-modules: requires kernel26<2.6.32
Should I just ignore dependencies and go on? If so, I'm not sure how to do that with pacman...
Last edited by DarksideEE7 (2009-12-15 04:42:27)
Offline
You need to enable community-testing if you want virtualbox for 2.6.32.
You downgrade by commenting out testing repos and issuing pacman -Suu.
Offline
All right, that's exactly what I needed to know. Thanks a million.
Offline
It's a good idea to install kernel26-lts and keep it as a backup kernel.
Offline
Looks good so far, my OSD and fan monitor on my eeepc doesn't work anymore. Oh well, small price to pay for good wifi I suppose (if it does indeed make it better.)
Offline
how long does it usually take for a new kernel to make it from testing to stable?
Offline
how long does it usually take for a new kernel to make it from testing to stable?
I'm not sure, hopefully someone else can shed some light. I'm going to wait for the official release because many of my eeepc controls/features weren't working.
Surprisingly I was getting a 70/70 signal strength via iwconfig.......which is normally unheard of.
Offline
There are no rules - but I've noticed that it's usually 20-30 days after initial release (depends on how many bug reports are sent)
Offline
Well I'm not sure why, but when I upgraded both my i686 and x86_64 systems today I downloaded and installed the kernel headers for 2.6.32, but not the kernel itself......uname -a still shows 2.6.31.
What's up with that?
Offline
kernel-headers package doesn't have much in common with kernel26 package. Starting with 2.6.32, every kernel should have its separate kernel26-headers package (kernel26 2.6.32 and kernel26-headers 2.6.32 are still in the testing repo).
Offline
Why is kernel-headers 2.6.32 in core but not kernel 2.6.32?
As a result pacman -Syu wants to upgrade my headers but not the kernel.
Is that good?
Last edited by fmjrey (2009-12-16 14:36:27)
Offline
The kernel-headers package is not what you think it is. You are confusing it with the new kernel26-headers package introduced with .32. Please read -> http://bbs.archlinux.org/viewtopic.php?id=49105
Last edited by Mr.Elendig (2009-12-16 15:02:11)
Evil #archlinux@libera.chat channel op and general support dude.
. files on github, Screenshots, Random pics and the rest
Offline
Pages: 1