You are not logged in.

#1 2009-12-31 20:04:29

Anikom15
Banned
From: United States
Registered: 2009-04-30
Posts: 836
Website

Should I use testing?

Is it really problematic?


Personally, I'd rather be back in Hobbiton.

Offline

#2 2009-12-31 20:20:35

Barrucadu
Member
From: York, England
Registered: 2008-03-30
Posts: 1,158
Website

Re: Should I use testing?

You perhaps have to be a bit more wary of kernel or xorg updates, but on the whole it's pretty stable.

Offline

#3 2009-12-31 20:46:06

dyscoria
Member
Registered: 2008-01-10
Posts: 1,007

Re: Should I use testing?

And make sure to subscribe to the arch dev public mailing list.


flack 2.0.6: menu-driven BASH script to easily tag FLAC files (AUR)
knock-once 1.2: BASH script to easily create/send one-time sequences for knockd (forum/AUR)

Offline

#4 2009-12-31 20:52:29

flowheat
Member
From: Pittsburgh, PA
Registered: 2008-09-23
Posts: 94

Re: Should I use testing?

dyscoria wrote:

And make sure to subscribe to the arch dev public mailing list.

As long as you pay attention that mailing list I'd say 99% of the time you're aware of a problem before you get around to updating.  As long as you're willing to accept the possible consequences(most of which can be mitigated with a good back up system) testing is great for those of us who want the newest software asap(which I imagine is why most are here).

Personally I've been running it for over a year now(wow my first whole year with arch) and haven't had any problems I couldn't recover from.

Offline

#5 2009-12-31 22:00:33

ozar
Member
From: USA
Registered: 2005-02-18
Posts: 1,686

Re: Should I use testing?

Should I use testing?

If you are experimental by nature, then you definitely should.

It's actually a good way to learn a little more about how Linux works, or it doesn't work if it should break, and it's very helpful to the package maintainers to have lots of willing testers.

Hope you have fun with it!  smile


oz

Offline

#6 2009-12-31 22:23:20

descendent87
Member
Registered: 2009-07-23
Posts: 105

Re: Should I use testing?

I've used testing for ages and not run into any major problems, just subscribe arch-dev-public mailing list and keep an eye on the testing forum before any major updates and you should be fine, enjoy life on the bleeding edge

Offline

#7 2010-01-01 01:30:28

1LordAnubis
Member
Registered: 2008-10-10
Posts: 253
Website

Re: Should I use testing?

I don't see any *need* to run testing on Arch.. its very up to date.


Any society that would give up a little liberty to gain a little security will deserve neither and lose both.
-Benjamin Franklin
The reasonable man adapts himself to the world; the unreasonable one persists in trying to adapt the world to himself. Therefore all progress depends on the unreasonable man.
-George Bernard Shaw

Offline

#8 2010-01-01 01:35:38

ngoonee
Forum Fellow
From: Between Thailand and Singapore
Registered: 2009-03-17
Posts: 7,360

Re: Should I use testing?

1LordAnubis wrote:

I don't see any *need* to run testing on Arch.. its very up to date.

How about testing packages so that they're more stable by the time they reach [core]?

That's the POINT of [testing] anyhow....


Allan-Volunteer on the (topic being discussed) mailn lists. You never get the people who matters attention on the forums.
jasonwryan-Installing Arch is a measure of your literacy. Maintaining Arch is a measure of your diligence. Contributing to Arch is a measure of your competence.
Griemak-Bleeding edge, not bleeding flat. Edge denotes falls will occur from time to time. Bring your own parachute.

Offline

#9 2010-01-01 02:01:34

fastfret79
Member
Registered: 2009-09-05
Posts: 87

Re: Should I use testing?

I've been thinking of enabling [testing] for a while and after reading this thread I have.

Just updated and rebooted and no problems so far.

Offline

#10 2010-01-01 02:08:36

sHyLoCk
Member
From: /dev/null
Registered: 2009-06-19
Posts: 1,197

Re: Should I use testing?

I used testing for a while, no major issues except for X and nvidia package upgrades.


~ Regards,
sHy
ArchBang: Yet another Distro for Allan to break.
Blog | GIT | Forum (。◕‿◕。)

Offline

#11 2010-01-01 03:10:55

JohannesSM64
Member
From: Norway
Registered: 2009-10-11
Posts: 623
Website

Re: Should I use testing?

I'm happy with non-[testing], but I'm planning to enable [testing] in a while, when I get more proficient with GNU/Linux/*nix/Arch. Mainly to help spot bugs ASAP.

Offline

#12 2010-01-01 03:53:46

pogeymanz
Member
Registered: 2008-03-11
Posts: 1,020

Re: Should I use testing?

I guess I will enable [testing] and just not jump the gun with Xorg and kernel updates. I want to contribute to Arch, so I feel obligated.

Offline

#13 2010-01-01 08:29:28

ngoonee
Forum Fellow
From: Between Thailand and Singapore
Registered: 2009-03-17
Posts: 7,360

Re: Should I use testing?

*puts on Allan cap*

If you're running [testing] then of course you'd be subscribed to the [arch-dev-public] mailing list and receive all the updates from the packagers in real-time as they update their packages.

*takes off Allan cap*

I didn't break anything!


Allan-Volunteer on the (topic being discussed) mailn lists. You never get the people who matters attention on the forums.
jasonwryan-Installing Arch is a measure of your literacy. Maintaining Arch is a measure of your diligence. Contributing to Arch is a measure of your competence.
Griemak-Bleeding edge, not bleeding flat. Edge denotes falls will occur from time to time. Bring your own parachute.

Offline

#14 2010-01-01 21:21:49

Mr.Elendig
#archlinux@freenode channel op
From: The intertubes
Registered: 2004-11-07
Posts: 4,097

Re: Should I use testing?

My opinion is that if you have to ask on the forum is you should use it or not, then the answer is no.

Last edited by Mr.Elendig (2010-01-01 21:22:06)


Evil #archlinux@libera.chat channel op and general support dude.
. files on github, Screenshots, Random pics and the rest

Offline

#15 2010-01-01 21:36:18

Primoz
Member
From: Ljubljana-Slovena-EU
Registered: 2009-03-04
Posts: 697

Re: Should I use testing?

I'm using it for quite sometime and so far so good, but currently I really don't need it as I use custom kernel and drivers...
But I'm seeing that some have problems with Kernel2.6.32, but I've used it for quite awhile (before changing it for custom kernel) and I had no problems with it.
So I'd say it's OK.
I had slight problems updating some packages like klibc-kbd, but that was more or less it. But don't forget to also add community-testing.


Arch x86_64 ATI AMD APU KDE frameworks 5
---------------------------------
Whatever I do, I always end up with something horribly mis-configured.

Offline

#16 2010-01-07 10:25:58

reuben
Member
Registered: 2009-10-07
Posts: 10

Re: Should I use testing?

I don't use the testing repo, but sometimes I'll pull a pkgbuild from testing using abs.

Offline

Board footer

Powered by FluxBB