You are not logged in.
Hi, I got a list of pending upgrade, but since nvidia and xorg making troubles to me I update single packages, packages that seems that cannot harm the system. Today I tried bash, Ive been using bash-4.0.035-1-i686 and upgraded to bash-4.1.002-1, after the upgrade I got an error message:
Proceed with installation? [Y/n]
:: Retrieving packages from core...
bash-4.1.002-1-i686 1107.7K 318.9K/s 00:00:03 [#####################] 100%
checking package integrity...
(1/1) checking for file conflicts [#####################] 100%
(1/1) upgrading bash [#####################] 100%
sh: symbol lookup error: sh: undefined symbol: rl_filename_rewrite_hook
error: command failed to execute correctly
sh: symbol lookup error: sh: undefined symbol: rl_filename_rewrite_hook
error: command failed to execute correctlyDowngrading fails as well:
yaourt -U /var/cache/pacman/pkg/bash-4.0.035-1-i686.pkg.tar.gz
/bin/bash: symbol lookup error: /bin/bash: undefined symbol: rl_filename_rewrite_hookNeedless to say that opening new terminal fails as well.
Any ideas?
Thanks!
[EDIT]
Seems like 4.0.035 is corrupted:
sudo pacman -U /var/cache/pacman/pkg/bash-4.0.035-1-i686.pkg.tar.gz
loading package data...
error: error while reading package /var/cache/pacman/pkg/bash-4.0.035-1-i686.pkg.tar.gz: Damaged tar archive
error: '/var/cache/pacman/pkg/bash-4.0.035-1-i686.pkg.tar.gz': libarchive errorLuckily downgrade to 4.0.033-1 works.
Last edited by skwo (2010-02-01 19:45:36)
ArchLinux x86_64 on Dell Latitude E5410
Offline
happens when you do partial updates. its broken because readline wasn't updated.
next time always use pacman -Syu
Give what you have. To someone, it may be better than you dare to think.
Offline
Wow thanks for a fast answer wonder!
Well pacman -Syu brakes other things so Ill stay with my current setup for now ![]()
ArchLinux x86_64 on Dell Latitude E5410
Offline
Wow thanks for a fast answer wonder!
Well pacman -Syu brakes other things so Ill stay with my current setup for now
heh -Syu doesn't break anything. not doing it can break everything like you did ![]()
Give what you have. To someone, it may be better than you dare to think.
Offline
skwo wrote:Wow thanks for a fast answer wonder!
Well pacman -Syu brakes other things so Ill stay with my current setup for nowheh -Syu doesn't break anything. not doing it can break everything like you did
Lol true ![]()
anyway -Suy breaks my xorg
ArchLinux x86_64 on Dell Latitude E5410
Offline