arch page design flaw

lustikus · 2010-02-17 16:58:34

the big arch logo seems to change from "Home" Tab to "Forums".
One has a sort of reflection, the other don't.

Allan · 2010-02-17 17:24:02

http://bugs.archlinux.org/ - there is a website category.

Ghost1227 · 2010-02-17 23:35:17

It's been fixed everywhere but AUR, and that one should be fixed shortly.

donpicoro · 2010-02-18 01:01:05

I still see it in the "Forums" tab as well

Ghost1227 · 2010-02-18 01:08:02

I don't. Clear your cache

stefanwilkens · 2010-02-27 19:55:20

Home / Forums / wiki / Downloads have the same logo, Bugs and AUR each seem to have their own rendition. Tested on Chromium / Firefox with a forced reload of the pages.

*edit*

let me clarify, the logo image is the same.. it's the rendition of "A simple, etc etc" that varies for me.

Last edited by stefanwilkens (2010-02-27 19:56:50)

Gen2ly · 2010-02-27 21:15:18

lol, that's good. It's one of those, 'What's wrong with this picture" things. Lol, nvr seen that b4.

paldepind · 2010-02-28 09:05:42

Why isn't all the pages just using the same image? So when that single image file gets updated it applies on all the pages.

hatten · 2010-02-28 10:26:10

Never noticed the forum's got a bold undertext, I vote for non-bold!

PJ · 2010-02-28 11:04:20

I don't care if it is either gnu/linux or linux distribution as long as it is consistent, I am not that much into holy wars.

But please make the undertext non-bold, it looks so much better!

stefanwilkens · 2010-02-28 11:55:08

http://bugs.archlinux.org/task/18494

Last edited by stefanwilkens (2010-02-28 12:01:38)

litemotiv · 2010-02-28 12:36:11

i notice that the 'hole' (arch?) in the center of the A is not smooth anymore, it has a few strange little bumps/dents. or was it like that before?

thayer · 2010-02-28 15:17:36

Some changes are coming soon that will render all above issues moot.

Last edited by thayer (2010-02-28 15:17:49)

Gen2ly · 2010-02-28 18:26:28

o.O

Misfit138 · 2010-02-28 21:50:24

The forums and wiki look terrific, thayer. I'm sure the AUR and F.S. will follow suit.

jasonwryan · 2010-03-05 23:08:18

...and the gnu is gone again? Wandered off into the savannah?

Misfit138 · 2010-03-06 01:05:35

jasonwryan wrote:

...and the gnu is gone again? Wandered off into the savannah?

I am saddened by this.

Allan · 2010-03-06 01:10:31

If we added GNU, we would need to add BSD at about 12% of the font size (based on license usage by Arch packages - and most of those GPL packages are not GNU projects).

Arch Linux

#1 2010-02-17 16:58:34

arch page design flaw

#2 2010-02-17 17:24:02

Re: arch page design flaw

#3 2010-02-17 23:35:17

Re: arch page design flaw

#4 2010-02-18 01:01:05

Re: arch page design flaw

#5 2010-02-18 01:08:02

Re: arch page design flaw

#6 2010-02-27 19:55:20

Re: arch page design flaw

#7 2010-02-27 21:15:18

Re: arch page design flaw

#8 2010-02-28 09:05:42

Re: arch page design flaw

#9 2010-02-28 10:26:10

Re: arch page design flaw

#10 2010-02-28 11:04:20

Re: arch page design flaw

#11 2010-02-28 11:55:08

Re: arch page design flaw

#12 2010-02-28 12:36:11

Re: arch page design flaw

#13 2010-02-28 15:17:36

Re: arch page design flaw

#14 2010-02-28 18:26:28

Re: arch page design flaw

#15 2010-02-28 21:50:24

Re: arch page design flaw

#16 2010-03-05 23:08:18

Re: arch page design flaw

#17 2010-03-06 01:05:35

Re: arch page design flaw

#18 2010-03-06 01:10:31

Re: arch page design flaw

Board footer