You are not logged in.
- Topics: Active | Unanswered
#1 2010-03-14 23:37:25
- ilpianista
- Fellow developer
- Registered: 2007-10-06
- Posts: 568
- Website
Amarok 2.3-1 is not Amarok 2.3!
Hi Archers,
seems that I packaged Amarok 2.3 before the official release. This means that we are using a Release Candidate not the stable 2.3, so please do not report any bug about this version on bugs.kde.org.
Amarok 2.3-2 will be the real Amarok 2.3 which will released tomorrow at this time.
Thank you
Offline
#2 2010-03-14 23:44:52
- Skripka
- Member
- From: 2X1280X1024
- Registered: 2009-02-19
- Posts: 555
Re: Amarok 2.3-1 is not Amarok 2.3!
Ooops. 
I kinda like it, despite being a RC and all.
Offline
#3 2010-03-14 23:48:27
- ilpianista
- Fellow developer
- Registered: 2007-10-06
- Posts: 568
- Website
Re: Amarok 2.3-1 is not Amarok 2.3!
I kinda like it, despite being a RC and all.
yes, it's very cool 
[/OT]
Offline
#4 2010-03-15 02:08:50
- idupree
- Member
- Registered: 2010-02-21
- Posts: 10
Re: Amarok 2.3-1 is not Amarok 2.3!
I *knew* something was up with 'extra' containing a newer version than amarok.kde.org! :-)
And now Google has found me your answer.
Offline
#5 2010-03-15 03:12:36
- ngoonee
- Forum Fellow
- From: Between Thailand and Singapore
- Registered: 2009-03-17
- Posts: 7,358
Re: Amarok 2.3-1 is not Amarok 2.3!
Haven't you realized, Arch is secretly a global experiment on time-travel. Why else would we get our packages so quickly? In this case Andrea messed up though, he forgot to re-sync his clock when time-travelling back with the source code....
Allan-Volunteer on the (topic being discussed) mailn lists. You never get the people who matters attention on the forums.
jasonwryan-Installing Arch is a measure of your literacy. Maintaining Arch is a measure of your diligence. Contributing to Arch is a measure of your competence.
Griemak-Bleeding edge, not bleeding flat. Edge denotes falls will occur from time to time. Bring your own parachute.
Offline
#6 2010-03-15 21:28:07
- ilpianista
- Fellow developer
- Registered: 2007-10-06
- Posts: 568
- Website
Re: Amarok 2.3-1 is not Amarok 2.3!
well...they released Amarok 2.3 just now; I did a md5sums on the tarball and checksum is the same I used -.-'
amarok-2.3-1 is Amarok 2.3!
Offline
#7 2010-03-15 21:33:36
- Skripka
- Member
- From: 2X1280X1024
- Registered: 2009-02-19
- Posts: 555
Re: Amarok 2.3-1 is not Amarok 2.3!
well...they released Amarok 2.3 just now; I did a md5sums on the tarball and checksum is the same I used -.-'
So I take it that you don't think the Amarok team could have beat the 1 in 2^128 odds of having two different tarballs with the same random hash? 
Offline
#8 2010-03-15 21:50:36
- ilpianista
- Fellow developer
- Registered: 2007-10-06
- Posts: 568
- Website
Re: Amarok 2.3-1 is not Amarok 2.3!
So I take it that you don't think the Amarok team could have beat the 1 in 2^128 odds of having two different tarballs with the same random hash?
go to ftp://ftp.kde.org/pub/kde/stable/amarok/2.3.0/src/ , Last Modified says: 2010-03-10 23:27
$ pacman -Qi amarok | grep "Build Date"
Build Date : Sat 13 Mar 2010 08:20:39 PM CET
So I think we are using the right tarball
Offline
#9 2010-03-15 21:59:35
- gtklocker
- Member
- Registered: 2009-09-01
- Posts: 462
Re: Amarok 2.3-1 is not Amarok 2.3!
Yes, you did...
I can't see the time you push it to the [extra] repo 
Offline
#10 2010-03-15 22:03:40
- ilpianista
- Fellow developer
- Registered: 2007-10-06
- Posts: 568
- Website
Re: Amarok 2.3-1 is not Amarok 2.3!
I can't see the time you push it to the [extra] repo
you can http://repos.archlinux.org/wsvn/package … ra-x86_64/
Offline
#11 2010-03-15 22:06:39
- gtklocker
- Member
- Registered: 2009-09-01
- Posts: 462
Re: Amarok 2.3-1 is not Amarok 2.3!
http://archlinux.me/gtklocker/2010/03/0 … pos-speed/
I second that
Last edited by gtklocker (2010-03-15 22:06:48)
Offline